From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Date: 2011-11-15T05:28:48+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:41041] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5628] Module#basename

--0016363ba20cc4ebae04b1b7b766
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I would probably be ok with mod.modules.last.name to be honest.

Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325


On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thomas Sawyer <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Issue #5628 has been updated by Thomas Sawyer.
>
>
> You're right. File is also Module (subclass of Class). So, yes, another
> name is needed, or ::File.basename accepted as an exception.
>
> In my defense, I always thought File class methods for file handling were
> bad mojo! It would be much better if Pathname were core and File class
> methods non-existent (IMHO).
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #5628: Module#basename
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5628
>
> Author: Thomas Sawyer
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:
> Category:
> Target version: 1.9.4
>
>
> Something I use fairly often:
>
>    some_module.name.split("::").last
>
> It's useful for things like factory methods. It would be much nicer if we
> had:
>
>    class Module
>      def basename
>        name.split("::").last
>      end
>    end
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>
>

--0016363ba20cc4ebae04b1b7b766
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would probably be ok with <a href=3D"http://mod.modules.last.name">mod.mo=
dules.last.name</a> to be honest.<div><br></div><div>Yehuda Katz<br>(ph) 71=
8.877.1325<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thomas =
Sawyer <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:transfire@gmail.com">transfi=
re@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div class=3D"im"><br>
Issue #5628 has been updated by Thomas Sawyer.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>You&#39;re right. File is also Module (subclass of Class). So, yes, a=
nother name is needed, or ::File.basename accepted as an exception.<br>
<br>
In my defense, I always thought File class methods for file handling were b=
ad mojo! It would be much better if Pathname were core and File class metho=
ds non-existent (IMHO).<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------<br>
Feature #5628: Module#basename<br>
<a href=3D"http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5628" target=3D"_blank">http=
://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5628</a><br>
<br>
Author: Thomas Sawyer<br>
Status: Open<br>
Priority: Normal<br>
Assignee:<br>
Category:<br>
Target version: 1.9.4<br>
<br>
<br>
Something I use fairly often:<br>
<br>
 =A0 =A0some_module.name.split(&quot;::&quot;).last<br>
<br>
It&#39;s useful for things like factory methods. It would be much nicer if =
we had:<br>
<br>
 =A0 =A0class Module<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0def basename<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0name.split(&quot;::&quot;).last<br>
 =A0 =A0 =A0end<br>
 =A0 =A0end<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href=3D"http://redmine.ruby-lang.org" target=3D"_blank">http://redmine.r=
uby-lang.org</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--0016363ba20cc4ebae04b1b7b766--