From: Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
Date: 2011-11-15T05:59:42+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:41043] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5628] Module#basename


Issue #5628 has been updated by Thomas Sawyer.


> I would probably be ok with mod.modules.last.name to be honest.

Then might as well add mod.lastname too. If the implementation is anything like the pure-Ruby one, it is more efficient to have a dedicated method. And I much prefer the shorter syntax. If not #lastname then maybe #modname.


----------------------------------------
Feature #5628: Module#basename
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5628

Author: Thomas Sawyer
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 1.9.4


Something I use fairly often:

    some_module.name.split("::").last

It's useful for things like factory methods. It would be much nicer if we had:

    class Module
      def basename
        name.split("::").last
      end
    end




-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org