[#40602] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5532][Open] Compile problem for bigdecimal on cygwin — Martin Dürst <duerst@...>

14 messages 2011/11/01

[#40617] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5534][Open] Redefine Range class and introduce RelativeNumeric and RelativeRange — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>

17 messages 2011/11/01

[#40646] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5541][Open] Better configure error message when llvm-gcc is the default compiler — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

10 messages 2011/11/01

[#40648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5543][Open] rb_thread_blocking_region() API is poorly designed — Christopher Huff <cjameshuff@...>

14 messages 2011/11/01

[#40684] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5555][Open] rename #include? to #includes? — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>

20 messages 2011/11/02

[#40688] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5556][Open] SIGHUP no longer ignored when sent to process group from a subprocess — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

12 messages 2011/11/02

[#40706] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5562][Open] Improvement of Windows IO performance — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>

39 messages 2011/11/03

[#40737] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5570][Open] Encoding of environment variables on Windows — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

11 messages 2011/11/04

[#40748] Proposal for sustainable branch maintenance — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

14 messages 2011/11/05

[#40770] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5578][Open] Embedded YAML for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

17 messages 2011/11/06

[#40806] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5583][Open] Optionally typing — Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>

21 messages 2011/11/07

[#40824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5588][Open] add negation flag (v) to Regexp — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

38 messages 2011/11/08

[#40865] IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

I'm not sure if this is a bug or intended as spec.

16 messages 2011/11/09
[#41151] Re: IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/11/19

2011/11/9 Eric Wong <[email protected]>:

[#41166] Re: IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/11/20

>> I noticed when a file name argument is passed to the IO.copy_stream, the

[#41168] Re: IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...> 2011/11/20

On 20/11/2011, at 5:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

[#41176] Re: IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/11/21

2011/11/20 Clifford Heath <[email protected]>:

[#41180] Re: IO.copy_stream creates files with restrictive permissions — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/11/21

>> I think documentation is the wrong answer. The security defects are not caused

[#40908] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5607][Open] Inconsistent reaction in Range of String — Yen-Nan Lin <redmine@...>

15 messages 2011/11/10

[#40941] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5617][Open] Allow install RubyGems into dediceted directory — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

22 messages 2011/11/11

[#40951] [Backport93 - Backport #5621][Open] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Mike Perham <mperham@...>

25 messages 2011/11/12
[#40971] [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Mike Perham <mperham@...> 2011/11/12

[#40972] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/11/12

Unfortunately ruby-head has a deadlock in one of my go-to scenarios for

[#40976] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...> 2011/11/13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#41128] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/11/18

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:

[#41129] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...> 2011/11/18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#41142] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5621] Please backport thread-safe autoloading patch — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/11/18

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Hiroshi Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:

[#40982] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5625][Open] Remove profanity and pejoratives — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>

30 messages 2011/11/13

[#41004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5628][Open] Module#basename — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

18 messages 2011/11/14

[#41024] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5632][Open] Attempt to open included class shades it instead. — Boris Stitnicky <boris@...>

12 messages 2011/11/14

[#41025] Proposal to add new methods: positive? negative? natural? — JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@...>

Hi all!

11 messages 2011/11/14
[#41027] Re: Proposal to add new methods: positive? negative? natural? — Jeremy Evans <code@...> 2011/11/14

On 11/15 12:58, Jos? Francisco Calvo Moreno wrote:

[#41031] Re: Proposal to add new methods: positive? negative? natural? — JosFrancisco Calvo Moreno <josefranciscocalvo@...> 2011/11/14

Hi Jeremy,

[#41038] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5634][Open] yield and binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

17 messages 2011/11/14

[#41086] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5644][Open] add Enumerable#exclude? antonym — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

14 messages 2011/11/17

[#41175] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5654][Open] Introduce global lock to avoid concurrent require — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>

12 messages 2011/11/21

[#41200] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5659][Open] bug releasing a gem created with rails 3.1 — Vinicius Gati <viniciusgati@...>

14 messages 2011/11/22

[#41212] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5662][Open] inject-accumulate, or Haskell's mapAccum* — Edvard Majakari <edvard.majakari@...>

12 messages 2011/11/22

[#41213] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5663][Open] Combined map/select method — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

62 messages 2011/11/22

[#41317] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5676][Open] miniruby linking error: undefined reference to ___stack_chk_guard — Martin Dürst <duerst@...>

10 messages 2011/11/27

[#41404] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5690][Open] Module#qualified_const_get — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

31 messages 2011/11/30

[ruby-core:41373] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5681][Open] Conflcting types for rb_w32_inet_ntop caused by duplicate definition under MinGW

From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-11-28 15:15:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #41373
2011/11/28 Luis Lavena <[email protected]>:
>
> Issue #5681 has been reported by Luis Lavena.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #5681: Conflcting types for rb_w32_inet_ntop caused by duplicate definition under MinGW
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5681
>
> Author: Luis Lavena
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada
> Category: build
> Target version:
> ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30) [i386-mingw32] building trunk
>
>
> MinGW 4.5.2 (TDM builds), building against trunk (r33885) is causing the following error:
>
> <pre>
> compiling ../../../../../../ruby/ext/socket/option.c
> ../../../../../../ruby/ext/socket/option.c:441:1: error: conflicting types for 'rb_w32_inet_ntop'
> ../../../../../../ruby/include/ruby/win32.h:276:22: note: previous declaration of 'rb_w32_inet_ntop' was here
> make[2]: *** [option.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/Users/Luis/Projects/oss/oneclick/rubyinstaller/sandbox/ruby19_build/ext/socket'
> make[1]: *** [ext/socket/all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/Users/Luis/Projects/oss/oneclick/rubyinstaller/sandbox/ruby19_build'
> make: *** [build-ext] Error 2
> </pre>
>
> All this triggered by recent refactoring of ruby/subst.h
>
> Applying the following patch solves the issue:
>
> diff --git a/ext/socket/option.c b/ext/socket/option.c
> index 1f334bb..41765f9 100644
> --- a/ext/socket/option.c
> +++ b/ext/socket/option.c
> @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ inspect_timeval_as_interval(int level, int optname, VALUE data, VALUE ret)
>  it is not distinguishable by the size.
> /
>
> -#ifndef HAVE_INET_NTOP
> +#if !defined(HAVE_INET_NTOP) && !defined(_WIN32)
> tatic char *
> net_ntop(int af, const void *addr, char *numaddr, size_t numaddr_len)
> 
>
> Can I apply?

Why win32.h don't turn on HAVE_INET_NTOP?  I mean platform specific
hack should be placed in platform specific files if possible.
configure.in is also good place to place platform hacks.

I apology if I'm missing mingw spefific something.

In This Thread