From: Stephen Touset <stephen@...>
Date: 2011-12-01T10:16:51+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:41421] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead)


Issue #5653 has been updated by Stephen Touset.


One thing to keep in mind is that `const_missing` *cannot* be used to replicate `autoload` currently due to Ruby cascading constant lookup to the Object namespace. Example:

    >> class Foo; end
    >> class Bar; end
    >> class Baz
    |    autoload :Foo, 'baz/foo'
    |
    |    def self.const_missing(name)
    |      require "baz/#{name.downcase}"
    |    end  
    |  end  
    >> Baz::Foo
    LoadError: cannot load such file -- baz/foo
    >> Baz::Bar
    => Bar

You can see here that Baz::Foo wasn't detected (even though there's a Foo in the Object namespace) and the autoload triggers. Baz::Bar, however, resolves to Object::Bar and the `const_missing`-based autoload does not fire as expected.
----------------------------------------
Feature #5653: "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead)
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5653

Author: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: lib
Target version: 2.0.0


 Hi,
 
 Today, I talked with NaHi about enhancing const_missing to enable
 autoload-like feature with nested modules.  But autoload itself has
 fundamental flaw under multi-thread environment.  I should have remove
 autoload when I added threads to the language (threads came a few
 months after autoload).
 
 So I hereby declare the future deprecation of autoload.  Ruby will
 keep autoload for a while, since 2.0 should keep compatibility to 1.9.
 But you don't expect it will survive further future, e.g. 3.0.
 
 I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries.
 
 							matz.


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org