From: e@...
Date: 2014-01-21T17:06:33+00:00
Subject: [ruby-core:59933] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library

Issue #2348 has been updated by Zachary Scott.


Theres a discussion going on about possibly removing dependency on RBTree, or SortedSet all together.

Please see #9121

----------------------------------------
Feature #2348: RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2348#change-44473

* Author: James Gray
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
* Category: lib
* Target version: next minor
----------------------------------------
=begin
 The merits of this library have been discussed on Ruby core, with the strengths best summarized by this post:
 
 http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/26602
 
 RBTree has now been fixed to run on Ruby 1.9:
 
 http://github.com/skade/rbtree
 
 I think we should now give serious consideration to bringing it into the standard library.
=end




-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/