[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83484] [Ruby trunk Feature#2152][Closed] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s
From:
mame@...
Date:
2017-10-22 01:38:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83484
Issue #2152 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Status changed from Assigned to Closed The discussion has been stalled for seven years, and there are no strong complaint. I think we can close this ticket. ---------------------------------------- Feature #2152: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2152#change-67493 * Author: rogerdpack (Roger Pack) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) * Target version: next minor ---------------------------------------- =begin Reposting here as a feature request. As a side note, I think I figured out why the confusion occured in posting the original--if one navigates to "feature requests" then click "new issue" it defaults to a Bug report, even though you were browsing feature requests. ============Proposal============= Currently the Float#to_s and Float#inspect return an "accurate" representation of the internal float, to help alert users of floating point inconsistencies. This is better than the old way. Some have recently pointed out that the old functionality has been lost [the old "pretty float" style]. This is surprising to them. In order to have 1.9.2 add functionality and not also lose the old, I propose to split the function of Float#inspect and Float#to_s thus: String#to_s will be the pretty way and String#inspect will be the more accurate way. With this in place, in irb users are notified of inaccuracies, and it is less surprising. I'm not totally set on using those method names--the proposal is that both be available somewhere. Thanks! -r =end ---Files-------------------------------- add_float_inspect.diff (2.17 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>