Pierre Munzel
Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
1401 Follower:innen
500+ Kontakte
Ehrenamt
-
Co-Founder // Board Member
Green Desert e.V.
–Heute 17 Jahre 7 Monate
Aufbau internationaler Kooperationen.
Administration
Projekte
-
Plantix
–Heute
Projekt anzeigenPlantix is an App devolped by PEAT that provides users worldwide with customized information concerning best practices, information on preventive measures and independent options for action. The App offers the possibility to send pictures of affected plants directly via smartphone and guides through an identification process to determine the plant disease in a very simple manner.
Sprachen
-
Deutsch
Muttersprache oder zweisprachig
-
Englisch
Fließend
Weitere ähnliche Profile
Weitere Beiträge entdecken
-
Michael Jackson
Yikes. 1 in 4 startups could leave Germany due to lack of capital. More than that probably should. I spoke at an event at the Technical University of Munich (great school btw) a couple of months back and was surprised at how many founders I met were looking to leave Germany. Much higher than I expected. https://lnkd.in/eHv2nPwT
55 Kommentare -
Samuel Hess
Every extra field on your checkout could be killing your revenue. Here's evidence: KoRo (€100M+ brand) had never A/B tested their checkout. Ever. Everything changed with a one, easy test: → Removed unnecessary form fields → Reduced cognitive friction → Applied behavioral psychology Result: 0.88% revenue uplift = nearly €1M annually The psychology behind it: f(Conversion) = Motivation × Ability × Trigger They optimized for "Ability" - making it easier to complete the purchase. The interesting part? That one test paid for our agency fees for the next 5 years. Most brands assume their checkout is "fine" because it follows industry standards. But standard ≠ optimal. Every unnecessary field, every extra click, every moment of confusion is revenue walking out the door. What friction points are hiding in YOUR checkout?
23 Kommentare -
Tomasz Tunguz
Walk into a bookstore’s self-help section , rows of productivity systems : Getting Things Done, Bullet Journal, Zettelkasten. Each promises transformation—if you commit weeks. The market thrives , hundreds of new titles annually. But something new is emerging. We’re discovering we can redesign workflows instantly with AI prompts instead of studying methodologies for weeks. Three recent experiments hint at what’s coming. First, Paper2Agent transforms research papers into working code agents in 30 minutes to 3 hours. Ask it to implement AlphaGenome’s genomic analysis from a published paper & it processes the code, builds the environment, runs the tutorials. Previously: read the paper (2 days), understand the methodology (1 day), code the implementation (3 days). Now: point AI at the repository, get a working agent by lunch. Second, when I discovered Google’s Agent Development Kit research on tool design patterns, I asked AI to redesign my automation tools following those principles. The result : a 41% reduction in AI operation costs, implemented while I was answering emails in another browser tab. Third, over the weekend I read Jesse Vincent’s architect/implementer workflow via Simon Willison’s write-up. The approach splits AI coding into two sessions: one architect to design, one implementer to execute. No weeks of trial & error to understand the nuances. Read, implement, test, done. The pattern emerging : instant implementation. We can now test productivity systems like trying coffee drinks. Monday : architect/implementer (cappuccino—structured , classic). Tuesday : traditional single-session (flat white—simpler , maybe better?). Wednesday : hybrid workflow (chai latte—wait , is this even coffee?). By Thursday , the data shows which saves 3 hours per week. The self-help aisle promised transformation through commitment. AI promises transformation through experimentation.
2 Kommentare