没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
Multi-contrast brain MRI image super-resolution with gradient-gu...
0 下载量 143 浏览量
2021-02-07
20:10:39
上传
评论
收藏 1.33MB PDF 举报
温馨提示
Multi-contrast brain MRI image super-resolution with gradient-guided edge enhancement
资源推荐
资源详情
资源评论


格式:pdf 资源大小:7.2MB 页数:12









格式:zip 资源大小:126.1KB


















Received August 1, 2018, accepted September 21, 2018, date of publication October 2, 2018, date of current version October 29, 2018.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2873484
Multi-Contrast Brain MRI Image Super-Resolution
With Gradient-Guided Edge Enhancement
HONG ZHENG
1,2
, KUN ZENG
1
, DI GUO
3
, JIAXI YING
1
, YU YANG
1
, XI PENG
4
,
FENG HUANG
5
, ZHONG CHEN
1
, AND XIAOBO QU
1
1
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Department of Electronic Science, College of Physical Science and Technology,
Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Processing of Image and Graphics, School of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of
Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
3
School of Computer and Information Engineering, Fujian Provincial University Key Laboratory of Internet of Things Application Technology, Xiamen
University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
4
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
5
Neusoft Medical System, Shanghai 110179, China
This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant 2017YFC0108703, in part by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61571380, Grant 61871341, Grant 61811530021, Grant U1632274, Grant 61672335,
and Grant 61601389, in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under Grant 2018J06018 and
Grant 2016J05205, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant 20720180056,
and in part by the Science and Technology Program of Xiamen under Grant 3502Z20183053.
ABSTRACT In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the super-resolution technology has played a great
role in improving image quality. The aim of this paper is to improve edges of brain MRI by incorporating
the gradient information of another contrast high-resolution image. Multi-contrast images are assumed to
possess the same gradient direction in a local pattern. We proposed to establish a relation model of gradient
value between different contrast images to restore a high-resolution image from its input low-resolution
version. The similarity of image patches is employed to estimate intensity parameters, leading a more
accurate reconstructed image. Then, an iterative back-projection filter is applied to the reconstructed image
to further increase the image quality. The new approach is verified on synthetic and real brain MRI images
and achieves higher visual quality and higher objective quality criteria than the compared state-of-the-art
super-resolution approaches. The gradient information of the multi-contrast MRI images is very useful.
With a proper relation model, the proposed method enhances image edges in MRI image super-resolution.
Improving the MRI image resolution from very low-resolution observations is challenging. We tackle this
problem by first modeling the relation of gradient value in multi-contrast MRI and then performing fast
supper-resolution methods. This relation model may be helpful for other MRI reconstruction problems.
INDEX TERMS MRI, image reconstruction, super-resolution, multi-contrast images.
I. INTRODUCTION
In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the low-resolution
(LR) is usually encountered due to acquisition constrains
such as limited sampling time or moving subjects. These
LR may seriously affect the post-processing and medical
diagnosis. To recover a high-resolution (HR) image from
its low-resolution version [1], super-resolution technologies
have been widely used in MRI [2]–[11].
Super-resolution methods can be roughly grouped into
two main categories: Interpolation and non-interpolation.
Interpolation approaches, e.g., the bicubic and bi-spline, are
usually fast but frequently generate over-smooth images.
Non-interpolation methods incorporate various image priors,
e.g., sparse representation [3]–[6], [11] non-local recon-
struction [7], [10] and total variations [8], [9], leading to
more attractive super-resolved images. However, these non-
interpolation methods usually require time-consuming iter-
ation processing and do not pay special attention to edge
information.
Edge structures of medical images have a particularly sig-
nificant impact on visual scenes to detect suspicions, classify
malformations and make diagnosis [15]. Thus, it is valu-
able to consider edge factor in image super-resolution. For
example, edges are preserved pretty well in a contrast-guided
interpolation (CGI) approach [16]. Edges are also sharpened
by considering gradient features [2], [12]. These methods,
57856
2169-3536 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only.
Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
VOLUME 6, 2018

H. Zheng et al.: Multi-Contrast Brain MRI Image Super-Resolution With Gradient-Guided Edge Enhancement
only explore the information from a single target image in the
low resolution, thus a faithful super-resolution may be hard to
achieve since the available information is very limited.
Other prior information beyond a single image is expected
to improve the image resolution [5], [7], [13], [14], [17], [18].
For example, non-local similarity of image patches is intro-
duced as the prior information [5], [7], [13], [14], [17]. These
methods also require time-consuming iteration processing.
In addition, Zheng et al. [18] introduced a fast interpolation
approach using the local weight similarity (ILWS) between
multi-contrast brain images to improve the resolution of the
LR MRI image. But, it does not perform satisfactorily when
the LR image is too smooth.
Recently, an effective interpolation method that establish-
ing gradient relations between the LR image and HR ref-
erence image with different contrast was proposed [19] in
the remote sensing. This method has a simple but effective
non-iterative linear model, and does not require training sets.
Image edges were interpolated much well according to the
reported results [19]. This model is called as the Super-
Resolution of using Gradient Relations (SRGR) model here.
The SRGR provides a promising direction to model rela-
tionship between the multi-contrast images due to its fast
computing and attractive performance. The SRGR, as far as
we know, has not been applied for MRI. What is more, to fit
for the multi-contrast MRI interpolation, SRGR should be
carefully modified since the images in MRI are very different
from those in remote sensing [19]. This aim of this work is
to model the gradient relations of multi-contrast MRI images
and improve MRI super-resolution.
In this work, we propose a new gradient linear relation
model for multi-contrast brain MRI super-resolution, which
is inspired by SRGR. The gradient information on edges
of a HR reference is used to guide the interpolation of a
LR MRI image. To further improve the resolution, the non-
local similarity of image patches is employed to robustly
estimate the intensity parameter of the model and the Iterative
Back-Projection (IBP) filter is enforced. Experimental results
will verify more promising results for our method than the
compared MRI interpolation approaches.
This paper is structured as follows. Section II gives a brief
review of the related work. Section III presents the proposed
approach. Section IV provides experimental results followed
by discussions in Section V. Finally, we summarize this work
in Section VI.
II. BACKGROUND AND RELATED WORKS
A. MULTI-CONTRAST IMAGES IN MRI
Multi-contrast images are frequently acquired in
MRI [1], [20] and the commonly acquired ones are T1w
and T2w. Plentiful edge structures are visible in these two
contrast images of the same subject (Fig. 1). According to the
MRI physics [21], the image S
(
Er
)
of T1w or T2w is generated
as follows:
S
(
Er
)
∝ ρ
(
Er
)
1 − e
−TR/T
1
(
Er
)
e
−TE/T
2
(
Er
)
, (1)
FIGURE 1. Multi-contrast MRI brain images: (a) a T1w image;
(b) a T2w image.
where ρ
(
Er
)
is the proton density at spatial location Er,
TR refers to the repetition time and TE denotes the echo
time. By setting different values of TR and TE, multi-contrast
images will be acquired. Yet, these images share the proton
density of the subject and hence they largely share similar
anatomical structures but with different contrasts in regions.
The shared information between inter-contrast images was
previously considered to profit the super-resolution [18] and
other image reconstruction tasks [22]–[24].
B. BRIEF REVIEWS OF SRGR MODEL
The SRGR model was proposed in super-resolution of remote
sensing images [19]. Its basic idea is described below.
Suppose that a LR image
˜
X
L
of its target HR image
˜
X
(Fig. 2(a)) and a HR reference image
˜
R (Fig. 2(b)) are avail-
able while
˜
X and
˜
R have same size. SRGR consists two
steps: 1) A pre-interpolated image X (Fig. 2(c)), that is with
the same size of
˜
X, is obtained with some classic interpola-
tion methods; 2) Gradient information from
˜
R is applied to
update X.
To improve the interpolation, the same gradient direction
is assumed between the multi-contrast images
˜
X and
˜
R. The
relationship of gradient is modeled as [19]
g(
˜
X
i,j
)
g(
˜
R
i,j
)
= λ
0
, (2)
where g
(
·
)
is a second order gradient function,
˜
X
i,j
is the pixel
of
˜
X,
˜
R
i,j
is the pixel of
˜
R and λ
0
is a parameter that models
this relationship ideally.
Assuming that an adjustment parameter δ
i,j
is added to the
(i, j) pixel X
i,j
of a pre-interpolated image X, the SRGR model
is formulated as [19]
min
δ
i,j
{[g(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) − λg(
˜
R
i,j
)]
2
+ [g
⊥
(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) − λ
⊥
g
⊥
(
˜
R
i,j
)]
2
} (3)
by considering a gradient direction l (Fig. 2(d)) and its normal
direction, also called edge direction, l
⊥
(Fig. 2(d)).
Now, we are prepared to discuss the essential parts
in Eq. (
3). First, the gradient functions g(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) and
g
⊥
(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) are defined as
g(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) = X
i+1,j−1
+ X
i−1,j+1
− 2(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
)
g
⊥
(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) = X
i−1,j−1
+ X
i+1,j+1
− 2(X
i,j
+ δ
i,j
) (4)
VOLUME 6, 2018 57857
剩余11页未读,继续阅读
资源评论


weixin_38569109
- 粉丝: 7
上传资源 快速赚钱
我的内容管理 展开
我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
我的收益
登录查看自己的收益我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
我的收藏
我的下载
下载帮助


最新资源
- 基于51单片机的温室大棚温湿度检测报警系统方案设计书.doc
- 嵌入式系统-概述.ppt
- 单片机的模糊温度控制器的设计实施方案.doc
- ADEL酒店门锁接口软件安装.doc
- 单片机遥控开关设计方案.doc
- 教学实践中如何高效管理计算机实验室.docx
- 图像处理实验研究报告.doc
- 计算机网络系统综合防雷设计实施方案实施方案.doc
- 通信原理2011B答案.doc
- 巧用网络空间-助力学校内涵发展的策略研究.docx
- 试论加强血站档案管理工作信息化建设的有效措施.docx
- MPS系统机械手站单元的设计方案与PLC控制.doc
- 企业应用软件通用安全规范.docx
- Mysql安装注意事项.doc
- 某电子商务项目研究报告.doc
- 应用型大学数据库学科实践教学体系探索.docx
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈



安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
