Fix precedence of the import alt operator #1460
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sjakobi
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cheers!
It seems that in order to fix all the precedence issues (#1457), we'll have to have one precedenceXExpression per operator, right?
Eventually we should probably also add these test cases to the acceptance test suite.
|
@sjakobi: Yeah, the reason it's grouped like that is a performance optimization since you only run into expressions with the wrong precedence if they are ill-typed expressions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #1455