Skip to content

Lucene 10: apply MADV_NORMAL advice to enable more aggressive readahead #114410

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

ChrisHegarty
Copy link
Contributor

This commit applies MADV_NORMAL advice to enable more aggressive readahead.

@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 13:11
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the needs:triage Requires assignment of a team area label label Oct 9, 2024
@javanna javanna added :Search Foundations/Search Catch all for Search Foundations >enhancement and removed needs:triage Requires assignment of a team area label labels Oct 9, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-foundations (Team:Search Foundations)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch label Oct 9, 2024
@javanna javanna added v9.0.0 and removed Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch labels Oct 9, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch label Oct 9, 2024
@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty merged commit 8835728 into elastic:lucene_snapshot Oct 9, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty deleted the readahead branch October 9, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>enhancement :Search Foundations/Search Catch all for Search Foundations Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants