Handle search timeout in SuggestPhase #122357
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes elastic#122186
|
Pinging @elastic/es-search-foundations (Team:Search Foundations) |
|
Hi @javanna, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
original-brownbear
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2025
| try { | ||
| SuggestPhase.execute(searchContext); | ||
| } catch (ContextIndexSearcher.TimeExceededException timeExceededException) { | ||
| SearchTimeoutException.handleTimeout( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe add an overload to this method that just takes a searchContext? Removes some duplication and keeps the cold path code size down :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is an option, I think back when I added it I wanted to not make the method depend on the entire context, which exposes all kinds of stuff.
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/query/QueryPhaseTimeoutTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/search/query/QueryPhaseTimeoutTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Thanks @original-brownbear for the review! |
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes elastic#122186
💔 Backport failed
You can use sqren/backport to manually backport by running |
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes elastic#122186
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes elastic#122186
This was referenced Feb 13, 2025
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes #122186
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes #122186
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user. Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase. For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT. Closes #122186
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to elastic#122357
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to elastic#122357
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2025
We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to #122357 Closes #122548
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to elastic#122357 Closes elastic#122548
This was referenced Feb 15, 2025
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to elastic#122357 Closes elastic#122548
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
…22676) We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to #122357 Closes #122548
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
…22675) We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to #122357 Closes #122548
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2025
…22677) We recently fixed timeout handling in the suggest phase. A test failure on SearchTimeoutIT surfaced an issue with the current approach. In case partial results are allowed, it may happen that some shards time out while executing the suggest phase and some don't. SearchPhaseController assumes that if one shard has suggest results, all of the other shards will have suggest results too. We could address that assertion and check is the search timed out, instead this commit changes timeout handling in the suggest phase to return an empty suggestion instead of null. This seems appropriate in terms of providing some results and makes the assertion about non null suggestions in SearchPhaseController happy. Relates to #122357 Closes #122548
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Whenever a search timeout is set to a search request, the timeout may be triggered by the suggest phase via exitable directory reader. In that case, the exception that is thrown by the timeout check needs to be handled, instead of returned back to the user.
Instead of handling the timeout in each phase, this commit handles it as part of QueryPhase for both SuggestPhase and RescorePhase.
For rescore phase, one integration test that is time dependent is also rewritten to remove the time dependency and moved from QueryRescorerIT to SearchTimeoutIT.
Closes #122186