Interpolated variables should be factored into checksum

[Porges]

• Task version: v3.7.0 (h1:8dDFv12/Lxi6PHkYNIIm7N6v6oRGxePpLK67LuMh/Rs=)
• Operating System: Linux 2d7a33008788 5.10.43.3-microsoft-standard-WSL2 # 1 SMP Wed Jun 16 23:47:55 UTC 2021 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Example Taskfile showing the issue

version: '3.7'

run: when_changed

vars:
  VERSION: 1

tasks:
  generate-file:
    sources:
    - base.txt
    cmds:
    - <base.txt sed -e 's/VERSION/{{.VERSION}}/g' > versioned.txt

When changing VERSION from 1 to 2, this should cause generate-file to re-run. At the moment it doesn’t because interpolated variables are not incorporated into the checksum.

[Porges]

Also, ideally, the task itself would be checksummed somehow, so that if I change the commands it will re-run.

[andreynering]

Hi @Porges,

It's currently possible to instruct Task to invalidate the checksum on specific variables changes by adding a label: prop to the task:

version: '3'

tasks:
  generate-file:
    cmds:
      - ...
    label: 'generate-file-{{.VERSION}}'

It's a valid discussion whether we should do that by default or not, as you suggested. I think it may be unexpected to some users. For example: if a variable isn't deterministic (a date/time or something) the task will always run and that may not always be the expected behavior.

This makes me think that, if done, there should probably be a setting to choose the appropriate behavior. But maybe label: is enough and we would not even need that...

[ghostsquad]

I found myself changing my task file, and later wondering how I was going to invalidate the cache automatically. It's not really just vars, it's actually the entire task definition. I imagine that you may want to checksum the output of --dry-run as part of the caching behavior, or at least some flag to enable or disable that.

I'm curious what people think about having the default behavior include the task definition itself (and variable values) as part of the checksum, with a flag to disable 1 or both of those?

[ahus1]

@ghostsquad: +1 for making the task definition part of the checksum (not sure about interpolations as a new user yet). I admit that I'm new to task, still the first thing I did was adding Taskfile.yaml as one of the sources (which would build too much).

[ghostsquad]

For now, I'm including Taskfile.yml itself in sources. This is equivalent of using a sledge hammer when a rubber mallet would be sufficient.

[ahus1]

This is equivalent of using a sledge hammer when a rubber mallet would be sufficient.

I know, and it wasn't fun. Next iteration was task -f taskname, but found that it also forces the dependencies of a task to run.

Current iteration: a small script that extracts each task from the Taskfile.yaml and use that as a source: once the task changes, run the task again. Works OK for now.

# Taskfile.yaml
tasks:
  split:
    desc: Split Taskfile to one-file-per-task for dirty checking
    run: once
    cmds:
      - bash -c ./split.sh
    sources:
      - Taskfile.yaml
      - split.sh
    silent: true

  ipchange:
    deps:
      - split
    cmds:
      # ...
    sources:
      - .task/subtask-{{.TASK}}.yaml

# split.sh
set -euo pipefail
mkdir -p .task
rm -f .task/subtask-*.yaml
for i in $(yq -M e '.tasks | keys' Taskfile.yaml); do
   yq -M e ".tasks.${i}" Taskfile.yaml > .task/subtask-${i}.yaml
done

[andreynering]

Hi @ahus1,

Have you tried my suggestion done here? #548 (comment)

I believe that's what you're are looking for.

[ahus1]

@andreynering - your suggestion will solve AFAIK the problem when a variable changes, as the labels changes with the variable. I don't know what will happen if the variable changes back to the old value: Would it then run again, or will the state with the old variable value / label name will be still there and it will not run?

This thread evolved form interpolating variables to also include the body of the task definition, so that whenever the definition changes, the task should run again. The variable/label approach doesn't cover that, so I looked for something else. So I came up with the idea to split the taskfile by tasks, and then use that as a "sources" element. I did some iterations with that, and it looks ok for me. although a bit verbose.