Skip to content

MSC3975: rel_type for Replies #3975

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

MSC3975: rel_type for Replies #3975

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

imbev
Copy link

@imbev imbev commented Mar 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Signed-off-by: Isaac Beverly [email protected]

@imbev imbev changed the title Add introduction for rel_type for replies proposal. MSC3975: rel_type for Replies Mar 8, 2023
@imbev imbev closed this Mar 8, 2023
@imbev imbev deleted the rel_type-for-replies branch March 8, 2023 18:22
@imbev imbev restored the rel_type-for-replies branch March 8, 2023 18:23
@imbev imbev reopened this Mar 8, 2023
clokep
clokep reviewed Mar 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
clokep
clokep reviewed Mar 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
clokep
clokep reviewed Mar 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
clokep
clokep reviewed Mar 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
clokep
clokep reviewed Mar 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

@imbev when you get a chance, please sign off on this MSC per the contributing guidelines

@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Mar 8, 2023
@imbev imbev marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2023 18:06
@imbev imbev closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 20, 2025
@turt2live turt2live added the abandoned A proposal where the author/shepherd is not responsive label Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clokep clokep clokep left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
abandoned A proposal where the author/shepherd is not responsive client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@imbev @turt2live @clokep