Skip to content

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel commented Feb 21, 2018

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@b585e3b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #19820   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   91.58%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      150           
  Lines             ?    48892           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    44780           
  Misses            ?     4112           
  Partials          ?        0
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.96% <ø> (?)
#single 41.79% <ø> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b585e3b...8b2f38e. Read the comment docs.

@jreback jreback added Timedelta Timedelta data type Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions labels Feb 22, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doc comment. ping when pushed.

- Bug in :func:`Timedelta.__floordiv__`, :func:`Timedelta.__rfloordiv__` where operating with a ``Tick`` object would raise a ``TypeError`` instead of returning a numeric value (:issue:`19738`)
- Bug in :func:`Period.asfreq` where periods near ``datetime(1, 1, 1)`` could be converted incorrectly (:issue:`19643`)
- Bug in :func:`Timedelta.total_seconds()` causing precision errors i.e. ``Timedelta('30S').total_seconds()==30.000000000000004`` (:issue:`19458`)
- Bug in :func: `Timedelta.__rmod__` where operating with a ``numpy.timedelta64`` returned a ``timedelta64`` object instead of a ``Timedelta`` (:issue:`19378`)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is not the correct reference, can you update?

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Feb 22, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 22, 2018

needs rebase actually. ping on green.

@jreback jreback merged commit ca27ee9 into pandas-dev:master Feb 22, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 22, 2018

thanks

harisbal pushed a commit to harisbal/pandas that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the tdfixes5 branch June 22, 2018 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions Timedelta Timedelta data type

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants