Chamber of Mayank Sharma’s cover photo
Chamber of Mayank Sharma

Chamber of Mayank Sharma

Law Practice

Noida, Uttar Pradesh 5 followers

Legal Wisdom, Practical Solutions.

About us

At Chamber of Mayank Sharma, we stand for integrity, commitment, and results in legal practice. Based in Delhi–NCR, we provide comprehensive legal solutions with a client-centric approach, combining deep legal knowledge with practical strategies. Led by Advocate Mayank Sharma, our chamber regularly represents clients before the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, District Courts, and specialized tribunals. With expertise across criminal, civil, corporate, family, property, cyber, and arbitration law, we deliver end-to-end services—from advisory and documentation to courtroom representation and dispute resolution. Our criminal law practice spans bail, trial defense, CBI/ACB cases, financial frauds, and cybercrime. We also handle family disputes, divorce, custody, property conflicts, recovery suits, corporate compliance, labor disputes, and insolvency proceedings. For businesses, we provide contract drafting, compliance, and commercial litigation support. Clients choose us for our transparent communication, strategic foresight, and personalized attention. We combine aggressive advocacy with ethical practice, ensuring that every matter is pursued with diligence and discretion. At Chamber of Mayank Sharma, we don’t just represent cases—we build trust, safeguard rights, and transform legal challenges into workable solutions. Your Justice, Our Responsibility.

Website
https://chamberofmayank.com/
Industry
Law Practice
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
Noida, Uttar Pradesh
Type
Self-Employed
Founded
2022
Specialties
Criminal Defense Litigation, Bail & Anticipatory Bail Matters, White Collar Crime & Financial Fraud Cases, CBI, ACB & Economic Offense Cases, Civil Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Family Law – Divorce, Custody & Maintenance, Domestic Violence & Matrimonial Disputes, Property & Real Estate Disputes, Recovery Suits & Cheque Bounce Matters, Corporate & Commercial Law, Arbitration & Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Banking, Finance & Insolvency Law (IBC), Consumer Protection Cases, Cyber Law & Cybercrime Matters, Constitutional & Writ Petitions, Contract Drafting & Legal Documentation, RERA & Real Estate Compliance, Employment & Labor Law Disputes, High Court & Supreme Court Litigation, and Legal Advisory & Compliance for Corporates

Locations

Employees at Chamber of Mayank Sharma

Updates

  • Media Trials: A Threat to Justice: Media is often called the fourth pillar of democracy, meant to expose flaws and serve society. But media trials—where news outlets declare someone guilty without due process—pose a serious risk to justice. Such trials ignore facts, spread bias, and can unfairly influence judges, investigators, and public opinion. Even if the accused is later acquitted, they often live under lifelong stigma, harming not just them but also their families. While Article 19 grants freedom of speech, it has limits. To uphold dignity and fairness, the media must act responsibly and regulations must prevent misuse of this powerful platform.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • In India, the criminal trial system rests on constitutional protections, due process, and the fundamental principle of considering every individual innocent until proven guilty. Courts operate within a well-defined framework of evidence, procedures, and legal reasoning to uphold fairness and impartiality. However, the media trial phenomenon diverges from these safeguards by constructing narratives that may pre-judge the accused and sway public opinion well before a verdict is reached. While the media serves a vital role in advocating transparency and answerability, its penchant for sensationalism poses a threat to the integrity of the judicial process. Preserving the presumption of innocence, ensuring a fair trial, and safeguarding the judiciary's independence are non-negotiable aspects. Justice should not be sensationalized but rather anchored in legal principles, factual evidence, and rational judgment. It is essential to strike a balance where the media educates while the courts exclusively administer justice.