From my experience, the majority of people are overwhelmed by the whole 'prompt engineering' terminology. 😅 So I tell them to just see prompting as 'briefing' or 'giving instructions instead. And treat ChatGPT like a junior human assistant that needs absolute clarity before it can do a decent job. That means the tool needs to go through an onboarding process to understand your business, brand voice, and customer. You then need to trust your own human experience and expertise to ask it for what you want. In your own words. 🤯 Then critique it. Add to it. Refine and finalise. The idea of getting prompts 'right' seems to intimidate people. Do you agree? I go into this in more detail in my book 'AI-Human Fusion' in the AI section of the HABITS Framework. Grab your copy today! #LinkedInNewsAustralia #ai #aiHumanFusion #keepithuman
I’d also add that your best “prompts” come from knowing your business inside out
The best prompts are just good instructions wrapped in human clarity. If you can brief an intern, you can brief a bot.
I tell people the same thing, just talk to AI like you're explaining a task to a new assistant. The clearer you are, the better it works. Leanne Shelton ✨
Scaling Organizations with AI Agents, Data Platforms & Productivity Tools | Unlock up to 90% Productivity Gains with AI | Follow me for Daily Data & AI Insights
3moIt is also just a word, you are right call it a brief/instruction or whatever feels more comfortable or natural. Promting should not be perceived as some voodoo magic. I do think it is valuable for people to work with frameworks. Creating a system can be intimidating at first but once you got the hang of it, you will be much faster and get better results. Most frameworks are designed to support plug-and-play. That is where you will find it's value.