cppint报错"virtual" is redundant since function is already declared as "override"
时间: 2025-02-22 20:32:52 浏览: 76
在C++中,`virtual`关键字用于声明基类中的虚函数,当派生类重写这个基类函数并使用`override`关键字时,通常情况下`virtual`是不必要的,因为`override`已经明确指出了这是一个重写的虚函数[^1]。如果你在派生类的成员函数声明中使用了`virtual`,即使后面跟着`override`,编译器会报错,因为`virtual`是冗余的。
错误情况的示例代码可能是这样(假设`BaseClass::func()`已经被声明为虚函数):
```cpp
class DerivedClass : public BaseClass {
public:
// 错误,因为`virtual`是多余的
virtual void func(); // 这里不需要再写 virtual
override void func() { ... } // 这个 override 是正确的,表示正在覆盖基类的虚函数
};
```
解决此问题的方法只需移除`virtual`关键字即可:
```cpp
class DerivedClass : public BaseClass {
public:
// 正确,去掉 virtual
void func() override; // 使用 override 明确标记这是对基类虚函数的重写
};
```
相关问题
The setup binding property "nowFirst" is already declared. found in
In the provided document, the setup binding property `nowFirst` is indeed declared more than once, which can cause issues in the Vue application. Here are the specific instances where it is declared:
1. **Initial Declaration:**
```javascript
const state = reactive({
nowFirst: 'projectCode',
// other properties...
});
```
2. **Redundant Declaration:**
```javascript
const departChange = (val) => {
if (val == 2) {
nowFirst.value = 'orgCode_dictText';
// other logic...
} else {
nowFirst.value = 'projectCode';
// other logic...
}
columnsKey.value += 1;
};
```
### Solution
To resolve this issue, you should ensure that `nowFirst` is only declared once in the `state` object. The `departChange` function can then modify the `nowFirst` property as needed without redeclaring it.
Here is the corrected version of the relevant parts of the code:
1. **State Initialization:**
```javascript
const state = reactive({
nowFirst: 'projectCode',
columnsKey: 0,
projectNameList: [],
projectName_Code: '',
projectBudgetMarginWarning: 0,
expandedRowKeys: [],
workorderProjectList: [],
description: '营业报表管理页面',
fastTime: ['本月', '上月', '近半年'],
noCreate: true,
hasUpdateTime: true,
configOrderSubTypeList: [],
configOrderSubTypeTemp: undefined,
allDepartList: [],
hallCodeDataList: [],
spinning: false,
checkFlag: true,
updateTime: '',
url: {
list: "/web/materialVoucherDetails/getProjectMaterialStatistic",
exportXlsxUrl: "/web/materialVoucherDetails/exportProjectMaterialStatisticExcel",
exportPdfUrl: "/web/bizBusinessRecord/exportpdf",
exportDetailUrl: "/web/bizBusinessRecord/exportDetailExcel"
},
keyList: ['saleNum', 'saleName', 'terminalTypeName', 'userTypeName', 'configOrderMainTypeName', 'configOrderSubTypeName'],
ipagination: {
current: 1,
pageSize: 20,
pageSizeOptions: ['20', '50', '80'],
showTotal: (total, range) => `${range[0]}-${range[1]} 共 ${total} 条`,
showQuickJumper: true,
showSizeChanger: true,
total: 0
},
originColums: [],
columns: [
// column definitions...
],
queryParam: {
type: '',
projectCode: '',
projectName: '',
projectName_Code: "",
subProjectName: '',
departId: '',
material: '',
producerId: '',
specification: '',
materialInventoryResult: '',
projectDateBegin: '',
projectDateEnd: ''
},
dataSource: [],
loading: false,
toggleSearchStatus: false
});
```
2. **Function to Change `nowFirst`:**
```javascript
const departChange = (val) => {
if (val == 2) {
state.nowFirst = 'orgCode_dictText';
let objectArray = deepClone(state.originColums);
let movedElement = objectArray.splice(3, 1)[0];
objectArray.unshift(movedElement);
state.columns = objectArray;
} else {
state.nowFirst = 'projectCode';
state.columns = deepClone(state.originColums);
}
state.columnsKey += 1;
};
```
By making these changes, you ensure that `nowFirst` is only declared once and can be modified as needed within the `departChange` function. This will prevent any potential conflicts or errors in your Vue application.
Call to 'toString()' is redundant
Thank you for your question! The warning "Call to 'toString()' is redundant" typically occurs when there is a redundant call to the `toString()` method.
In many programming languages, objects have a `toString()` method that converts the object to a string representation. However, when you concatenate or use an object directly in a string context, the `toString()` method is automatically called, so explicitly calling `toString()` is unnecessary.
Here's an example to illustrate this:
```java
String name = "John";
String message = "Hello, " + name.toString() + "!"; // Redundant call
System.out.println(message);
```
In the above code, the call to `toString()` on the `name` object is redundant because the concatenation operator (`+`) automatically calls `toString()` internally. The code can be simplified as follows:
```java
String name = "John";
String message = "Hello, " + name + "!"; // No need for toString()
System.out.println(message);
```
By removing the redundant call, the code becomes cleaner and easier to read.
阅读全文
相关推荐
















