Powerful Practices for High-Performing Special Educators

Introduction

Stories special educators tell of their immersion into the profession are often told in disbelief that they beat the odds. Pathways to becoming a special educator are some of the most varied in the profession.

Retention of special educators is an issue that has been a concern and has been wrestled with for at least two decades. Whether a person stays or leaves teaching is often dependent on more than one factor, but among reasons given for exiting the profession are academic training, level of support provided by administrators, understanding of roles and responsibilities, feelings of collegiality with other teachers in the building, facilities and available resources, caseloads, paperwork, and student behavior.

Costs associated with the continual turnover of special education teachers are considered a burden to school districts that invest in the recruitment of special education teachers.

When Madelyn Will (1986) considered the question What’s so special about special education? the elephant in the room was revealed. Educational experiences that students with disabilities had been receiving were a product of a dual system. The precedent established in Brown versus the Board of Education that separate is not equal has been pivotal in promoting the concept that the academic welfare of students with disabilities is the responsibility of all educators.

Rather than serving as a faucet that is used to release pressure when the steam is too hot, special education should be designed as a finely tuned instrument that is selected carefully by professionals who are relentless and intentional in their commitment to teach all students. With the heightened emphasis on student achievement, now, more than ever, it is necessary to have highly effective special education teachers using research-based instructional practices with students on individual education programs (IEPs). The revolving door of special education teachers leaving the profession does little to enhance the academic integrity and continuity of a student’s program.

Teacher education programs are being asked to guarantee their graduates will be able to ensure and document a year of progress in student achievement. Most administrators and principals who hire and support new special educators know they must encourage and provide professional development. Confident, competent, and connected special education teachers apply knowledge and use their secure skills but also recognize areas where they can improve.

Topics in this book were selected because they were identified by new special educators and best-practice research as the most necessary practices in becoming a successful special education teacher. Contemporary research and focused observations of novice special educators confirmed the need for specific skills and knowledge in order to survive and thrive in the early years of one’s career.

Chapter 1, Working with Diverse Students, is unique from the other chapters because it addresses the changing population of students that all teachers need to be prepared to educate. It is an overview of one factor among many that must be addressed in the complex task of meeting the needs of diverse students in the world of special education. The nitty-gritty issues presented in Chapter 2, Organizing a Classroom for Instruction, and Chapter 3, Managing Student Behavior, are front and center in the minds of new special education teachers. Ideas from these chapters can be adapted and used to provide a basis to research other effective practices specific to a teacher’s classroom setting.

Once some level of order is achieved, the art of teaching becomes a priority. Chapter 4, Designing Effective Instruction; Chapter 5, Teaching Strategies and Learning Activities; Chapter 6, Graphic Organizers; Chapter 7, Incorporating Technology, and Chapter 8, Student Assessment and Evaluation, describe effective instructional practices to be used in the educational setting. The final chapter, Promoting Achievement Through Collaboration, affirms that successful teachers rely on partnerships as a fundamental and ongoing component of instruction.

Each chapter provides examples of situations a special educator faces daily. More importantly, the chapters contain classroom and instructional suggestions for new special education teachers to implement immediately. The strategies come from the research and have been implemented by highly effective teachers to support student achievement.

To achieve the book’s purpose, all chapters contain examples of teaching practices designed for instructional success. The chapters each list the Spanish and Hmong word for the number as a reminder to think inclusively. Each chapter begins with Chapter Objectives. The chapter objectives describe what the reader will know and/or be able to do as a result of conscientious reading. Next, the Chapter Introduction briefly provides the reader with the focus and essence of the chapter. The Wisdom of Practice section bonds the chapter objectives to a real-life educational practice that allows for an additional chapter focal point. What about the research supporting the chapter’s targeted educational practices? The In Brief: What Does the Research Say? section describes the best-practices research that substantiates the chapter’s content. Chapter Summaries provide a brief chapter review. The Self-Assessment and Reflection allows the reader to reflect and self-test the chapter’s information. And, finally, the Reference list provided at the end of the book lists the many useful references found throughout each chapter.

Use this book in the following ways:

1.   As a daily resource. Pull it off the shelf regularly to add to your teaching practices.

2.   As a tool for professional development. Focus on one chapter a month throughout the year.

3.   As a training document for preservice teachers ready to enter the profession. Provide it as a text for student teaching seminars.

4.   As a discussion point for collaboration in the school. Bring staff together to initiate the use of consistent strategies.

5.   As a guide for those whose quick entry into the arena of special education found them underprepared. Give it as a gift of support.

6.   As a refresher for experienced regular and special education teachers needing new ideas. Generate divergent thinking.

7.   As a model of integrated practices that support all learners. Document the successes.

8.   As a textbook in college and university courses such as Student Teaching Seminar, Special Education Practicum, Inclusive Practices, Differentiating Instruction, Research and Practice in Special Education, Teaching Diverse Learners, Instructional Practices for Students with Disabilities, and Special Education Methods and Materials.

OBJECTIVES

1.   Discuss the changing student diversity and demographics.

2.   Describe the impact of diverse populations in special education programming.

3.   Incorporate effective strategies associated with achievement of diverse students with disabilities.

4.   Use the What Works Clearinghouse to identify and provide examples of effective instructional programs.

5.   Compare and contrast the cultural context of disabilities associated with diverse populations.

6.   Dispel myths associated with teaching diverse students with disabilities.

7.   Analyze personal skills and competencies to increase effectiveness in working with diverse students with disabilities.

Special education teachers have responsibility for an increasingly diverse student population. Over- and underrepresentation of certain populations on Individual Education Programs (IEPs) are concerns in many schools. Special education referrals and census data of diverse students including English language learners (ELLs) present a complex and often confusing picture. Cultural background and belief systems impact the view some families have about disabilities.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the changing demographics and cultural influences students bring to the classroom. In addition, the chapter identifies professional and instructional practices known to be effective with diverse students before and during referral, as well as after diagnosis of a disability.

WISDOM OF PRACTICE: THE TECHNICOLOR WORLD OF TRUMAN ARMSTRONG

Of the 16 names on Truman Armstrong’s special education caseload, he could barely pronounce 11. Truman read through the list, stopping as he tried to pronounce some of the names, Anderson, Assad, Carlson, Harris, Juarez, LaPointe, Martinez, Nelson, Nguyen, Thao, Vallejo, Vasquez, Wilson, Xiong, Yusuf, Zupinski. He certainly had not expected such diversity when he returned to his rural hometown to begin his first year of teaching. Thinking back on some of the courses he had taken, Truman remembered that language and opportunity to learn could be mis-perceived by educators. He wondered if the students really belonged in special education. Truman looked for the students’ files. Some of the files were incomplete and others were vague. Thoughts were racing in his mind. What are the backgrounds of the students? Do they speak English? I don’t speak ANY foreign language … well, German, maybe, when my grandmother is around! Is there an ELL teacher? Truman started to make a list of questions and people to talk to.

Like Truman Armstrong, special education teachers face rapidly changing student demographics. Special educators are able to increase their effectiveness and confidence when they use strategies known to be instructionally powerful with diverse students who have special education needs. Student achievement can be enhanced when cultural and linguistic backgrounds are addressed.

IN BRIEF: WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH SAY?

Diversity includes gender, race, culture, language, religion, age, socioeconomic status, geographic location, sexual orientation, and ability or disability. Cultural and linguistic variables can be particularly challenging in special education referrals, assessment, and instruction.

Changing Student Diversity

Student demographics reflect the changes in society as a whole. Demographics vary dramatically by geographic location, but the average classroom of 30 students would typically have 15 Caucasian, 8 African American, 5 Latino/a, 1 Asian/Pacific Islander, 1 Native American, and 1 other student. Of those 30 students in the class, 4 would be identified with disabilities, 2 with specific learning disabilities, 1 with cognitive disabilities, and 1 with emotional behavior disorders. Six of the 30 students would be non- English speakers.

Language

Approximately 20 percent of students aged 5–17 speak a home language other than English, and nearly four million students in the United States are ELLs (United States Department of Education, 2006). The following are the most common language groups:

Race

The National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) in The Condition of Education (2008) identified 43 percent of the student population in the United States as being non-Caucasian, over 10 million nationwide. The increase of culturally and linguistically diverse students reinforces the need for teachers to be knowledgeable of family practices, values, and resources that students with a global history bring to school. This book is designed to support a more inclusive perspective.

THE IMPACT OF DIVERSE POPULATIONS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMMING

In 2004, the Descriptive Study of Services to Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students and LEP Students with Disabilities (Zehler, Fleishman, Hopstock, Stephenson, Pendzick, et al,. 2004) reported approximately 357,325 ELLs (or 9.2 percent of the student population) were provided special education services. This was the first national estimate of ELLs served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Child Count data from the United States Department of Education (2006) indicated that the number of ELLs who are on IEPs may be as high as 20 percent of the total special education population.

Disproportionate Representation

Disproportionate representation, high dropout rates, and the achievement gap for minority and culturally and linguistically diverse students remain concerns for special educators. Disability areas where Hispanic, Black, and Native American students are overrepresented include specific learning disabilities, cognitive impairment, and emotional behavioral disorders (Artiles & Trent, 1994; Duany & Pittman, 1990, Harry & Klingner, 2005; Zehr, 2004). Among native races in the United States, American Indian and Alaska Native populations have been reported as having some of the highest percentage of disabilities—22 percent, according to the 2000 Federal Census (Ogunwole, 2002). As many as 12.2 percent of African Americans are reported to have the most severe disabilities, in comparison with Asian/Pacific Islanders, the lowest reporting group, with 4.9 percent reporting severe disabilities (Kraus, Stoddard, & Gilmartin, 1996).

Teacher Attitude

In a 2002 study, Carlson, Brauen, Klein, Schroll, and Willig found that special education teachers self-reported feeling least skillful in working with ELL students with disabilities. Critical obstacles to culturally responsive teaching include negative teacher attitudes and expectations for students of color, and confusing disability with diversity (Gay, 2002). According to some researchers, there is an urgent need to refine the theoretical framework and methodologies used in preservice teacher education programs in order to better prepare general and special educators to work with diverse students and study the impact of multicultural students (Trent & Artiles, 1998).

Teacher Preparation

Preparation of special education teachers to meet the needs of ELLs is an area gaining attention in order to ensure effective assessment and instruction. Many programs that proliferated with the help of federal funds in the 1980s have been restructured or eliminated. Currently, fewer than 15 bilingual special education programs exist in the United States (Paneque & Barbetta, 2006). Although special education professional standards require knowledge and skill in language development, communicating with ELL students, and distinguishing between language difference and language disability, the competencies of teachers are just beginning to catch up to the needs of a growing student population.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

Special education teachers have a responsibility to be aware of and sensitive to the needs of diverse learners as well as to provide them with an appropriate education.

Special Education Teacher Competencies When Working With ELL Students

The following competencies have been identified as necessary when working with ELL special education students (Baca and Amato, 1989):

1.   Desire to work with culturally and linguistically exceptional children

2.   Ability to work effectively with parents of ELL students

3.   Ability to develop an appropriate IEP

4.   Knowledge and sensitivity toward the language and culture of the group served

5.   Ability to teach English as a second language

6.   Ability to conduct nonbiased assessment with culturally and linguistically exceptional students

7.   Ability to use appropriate methods and materials when working with ELLs

Other knowledge and skills that special educators find helpful to work successfully with ELL special education students include the following:

1.   Awareness of the scope of multicultural issues, including those that are medical, economic, religious, social, and political

2.   Knowledge of the stages of language development and use

3.   Willingness to collaborate

4.   Skill in identifying and utilizing school and community resources for culturally and linguistically diverse students with special needs

5.   Knowledge of the impact of the physical environment

6.   Ability to identify stress factors

7.   Fluency in a second language

Given the number of languages spoken in schools, it may be rare to speak the student’s native language or be from the same culture, however, sensitivity is important.

Culturally responsive special education is advocated by Geneva Gay as a comprehensive endeavor that will positively impact diagnosing students’ needs, curriculum content, counseling and guidance, instructional strategies, and performance assessment (Gay, 2002). Gay calls for a mix of tough love and unequivocal caring that translates into an emotionally safe and supportive place where the standard of achievement is challenging but set within reasonable and reachable levels. Multiple opportunities should be provided so students can be successful. Creative and imaginative methods, including the use of technology, are critical for engaging students who might be considered hard to teach. In order to eliminate bias, reduce stereotypes, and increase the chances of a more desirable living and learning climate, Gay promotes engaging students in activities that incorporate social justice and service learning.

The importance of effective strategies and research-based instructional methods and programs should not be underestimated. Practices selected because they are appropriate for the learner will reinforce student achievement when used consistently.

Effective Strategies and Student Achievement for Diverse Learners

The Institute of Education Sciences established by the United States Department of Education hosts the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), found at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/. The WWC lists and rates scientifically based instructional practices. The Web site is a helpful resource that special education teachers can access when making decisions about what methods are valid and reliable for diverse special education students.

For English language learners, peer tutoring pairs and response groups were two practices that received the highest rating of effectiveness for English language development (WWC, 2008). The rating is based on positive effects and strong evidence of a positive effect with no overriding contrary evidence. In other words, these are practices that should be used. Peer tutoring pairs involves one student tutoring the other, who needs the additional support to reinforce learning. Response groups typically involve four or five students working together and sharing responsibility to complete a task. Both tutoring pairs and response groups emphasize the use of peer interaction and discussion to complete a task.

Other researchers have added to the field of ELL special education best practices. In their study, Educator Perceptions of Standards-Based Instruction for English Language Learners With Disabilities, Thurlow, Albus, Shyyan, Liu, and Barerra (2004) noted strategies that have been found to support reading, math, and science achievement. Listed opposite are 12 strategies special educators have rated as highly effective in reading, math, and science.

WHAT WORKS? AN ACTIVITY

Read through the list of 12 strategies below. Select the five strategies you believe are most successful for reading. Then select five for math and five for science. Identify only five strategies (no more, no less) for each of the three content areas. Some of the strategies may have more than one letter. On the line in front of the strategy, write R for reading, M for math, and S for science. The answers will be provided later in the chapter.

_____ 1.   Cooperative Learning

Students work as a team to accomplish a task

_____ 2.   Curriculum-Based Probes

Student performance of skills that are timed and then charted to reflect growth

_____ 3.   Direct Teaching of Vocabulary

Specific vocabulary instruction using a variety of activities that hold attention

_____ 4.   Explicit Timing

Timing of seatwork to increase proficiency

_____ 5.   Graphic Organizers

Visual display of information to structure concepts and ideas

_____ 6.   Peer Tutoring

Pairing students, with one trained to tutor the other

_____ 7.   Preassessment Organization Strategies

Use of specific practices