Natural Language Processing Books
Showing 1-50 of 73

by (shelved 14 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.29 — 637 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 13 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.12 — 262 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 11 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.10 — 568 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 5 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.11 — 71 ratings — published

by (shelved 4 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.41 — 201 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.88 — 75 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.45 — 65 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.69 — 62 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.92 — 36 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.19 — 43 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.22 — 417 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.00 — 15 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.38 — 13 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.74 — 19 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.12 — 17 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.53 — 17 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.91 — 22 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.43 — 7 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.11 — 47 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.05 — 270 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.20 — 5 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.62 — 13 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.86 — 14 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.89 — 9 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.92 — 12 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.20 — 5 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.62 — 8 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.90 — 1,628 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.29 — 55 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.55 — 33 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.11 — 9 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.50 — 4 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.14 — 66 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.76 — 21 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.15 — 85 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.62 — 130 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.13 — 15 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.91 — 67 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.00 — 23 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.33 — 9 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 4.55 — 2,736 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.91 — 11 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.00 — 3 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as natural-language-processing)
avg rating 3.76 — 17 ratings — published 2002

“If literature were nothing more than verbal algebra, anyone could produce any book by essaying variations. The lapidary formula 'Everything flows' abbreviates in two words the philosophy of Heraclitus: Raymond Lully would say that, with the first word given, it would be sufficient to essay the intransitive verbs to discover the second and obtain, thanks to methodical chance, that philosophy and many others. Here it is fitting to reply that the formula obtained by this process of elimination would lack all value and even meaning; for it to have some virtue we must conceive it in terms of Heraclitus, in terms of an experience of Heraclitus, even though 'Heraclitus is nothing more than the presumed subject of that experience. I have said that a book is a dialogue, a form of relationship; in a dialogue, an interlocutor is not the sum or average of what he says: he may not speak and still reveal that he is intelligent, he may emit intelligent observations and reveal his stupidity. The same happens with literature; d'Artagnan executes innumerable feats and Don Quixote is beaten and ridiculed, but one feels the valour of Don Quixote more.”
― Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings
― Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings

“The voice that navigated was definitely that of a machine, and yet you could tell that the machine was a woman, which hurt my mind a little. How can machines have genders? The machine also had an American accent. How can machines have nationalities? This can't be a good idea, making machines talk like real people, can it? Giving machines humanoid identities?”
― The Good Luck of Right Now
― The Good Luck of Right Now