I didn’t choose legal tech for the convenience of machines. I chose it for the discomfort; the quiet recognition that machines were beginning to think like us, and sometimes, better than us.
That discomfort turned into conviction when I read a recent study showing that AI tools didn’t just assist lawyers; they outperformed them. They drafted cleaner contracts, flagged risks we overlooked, and did it without fatigue or ego.
And that’s the real disruption, not speed but judgment. For centuries, law was built on the belief that interpretation was a uniquely human craft. But what happens when algorithms start reading risk with more consistency than experience ever could?
Maybe this isn’t the end of law, but the end of law as a priesthood, where knowledge was guarded, not shared. AI doesn’t threaten lawyers; it threatens the monopoly on interpretation that defined our authority.
The machine isn’t in the back office anymore. It’s sitting beside us, learning quietly, drafting patiently, and reminding us that the future of law won’t be written about technology, it will be written with it.
#LegalTech #AIinLaw #FutureOfLaw #LegalInnovation #LawAndTechnology #AIEthics #HumanVsMachine #LawRevolution #ArtificialIntelligence
Bridging Law, Technology and Innovation
1wLove your platform, only thing I do not get is why you do not assign ownership of outputs (other than apps and projects) like every other AI provider