How to Build a Cost-Effective Stack with Apache Iceberg and ClickHouse

If Apache Iceberg adoption is fast, the ecosystem around it is growing even faster and that's creating one of the cheapest lakehouse infrastructure options available today To support this ecosystem, we have ClickHouse with its recent updates and how it is shaping our stack of choice . The Cost-Effective Stack: OLake by Datazip + Apache Iceberg + ClickHouse Here's what I'm seeing teams build for maximum cost efficiency: OLake, handles the heavy lifting of real-time database replication - streaming from PostgreSQL, MySQL and MongoDB directly into Apache Iceberg with throughput of 46K+ records/second. It's open-source, requires minimal infrastructure (no Spark, no Flink, no Debezium), and supports all major Iceberg catalogs. Not to state the hero of the stack- Iceberg provides the open table format that eliminates vendor lock-in while delivering ACID transactions, schema evolution, and time travel capabilities. ClickHouse delivers the analytics layer with proven 5-15x cost advantages over traditional warehouses but what I want to highlight are it's recent updates . ClickHouse v25.8 dropped major updates for Iceberg support (full source in comments) : ✅ Native Write Support - Full CRUD operations, not just reads ✅ Production-Ready Catalogs - REST, Glue, Unity all promoted to beta ✅ Schema Evolution - Add/drop/modify columns seamlessly ✅ Better Deletes - Position deletes merged efficiently ✅ Near Real-time Streaming - Perfect for ingestion platforms like OLake Why This Stack Works: Real-time ingestion → Open storage → Fast analytics = Maximum performance at minimum cost. #ApacheIceberg #OpenTableFormats #ClickHouse #DataLakehouse

  • text

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories