“I think the U.S. has a great chance of winning [the robotics race]. We’re leading in AI, and I think we’re building some of the best robots in the world. But we need a national strategy if we’re going to continue to build and stay ahead.” Apptronik CEO and co-founder Jeff Cardenas met with policymakers, other robotics innovators, and A3 - Association for Advancing Automation this week on Capitol Hill to discuss how the United States can become a leader in the next era of robotics. We believe humanoid robots will play a key role in our future, and that a national strategy for robotics will ensure the U.S. leads on the world stage. https://lnkd.in/gY_ZqD2w
Tim Shea
2mo
Thanks for sharing 👍
UpTech Solution
2mo
The U.S. has a strong foundation in AI and robotics, positioning us well to lead globally. A national strategy will not only help maintain this edge but also foster innovation and attract investment. Collaboration between policymakers, industry leaders, and innovators is crucial for developing a robust ecosystem that supports the growth of humanoid robots and other advanced technologies. Let's continue to drive progress and ensure the U.S. remains at the forefront of this exciting field.
Antony Gummery
1mo
I do think Humanoid Robots (other forms too) will at least from the beginning of wider adoption be Sovereign biased ... so how many Humanoids from China will succeed in the US and vice versa. There's some very interesting Human <>Robot demographics to consider: - China replacement of labor costs to Robots is a much smaller 'gap' than for US based scenario - there will be benefits of replacement but less bottom line 'pump' compared to US - US cost base case for Robots is uber compelling making it pretty inevitable that as and when they are ready for wider adoption (~ 2027) the ramp up will be exponential - Robot labor replacement ramp up will impact govt tax receipts from labor so I expect some form of Robot tax to be introduced to offset in the early stages as economies get to grips with the transition to post labor economics. This imposition will not undermine the fundamental value proposition - Speaking of Globalization ending and Trump's push to move more manufacturing back to US (aka US jobs) ... then factor in the above value case and timeline - that's going to be hugely disruptive from a labor perspective to Trump's suggested intentions - no one's taking about this! - Govts need to prepare for what's coming ...
DOIG Corporation, Factory Automation Product Distributor for WI
2moKeep an eye on the brand names involved, this is moving very fast. They may not all look like humans in the future, but the concepts within are all valid. "To Mars, Elon!"