Arthur Bedel 💳 ♻️’s Post

View profile for Arthur Bedel 💳 ♻️

Co-Founder @ Connecting the dots in Payments... | Global Revenue at VGS | Board Member | FinTech Advisor | Ex-Pro Tennis Player

Visa vs Mastercard vs American Express 👇 The card networks — Visa, Mastercard, and American Express are the biggest players in the global payments landscape, but they operate differently. 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐏𝐚𝐲𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬: ► 4-𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 (Visa, Mastercard, GIE Cartes Bancaires) This model involves consumers, issuers, merchants, & acquirers. Merchants interact with their customers and acquirers, while card networks serve as intermediaries. ► 3-𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 (American Express, Discover Financial Services) In this model, one entity acts as the issuer, acquirer, & network. Merchants now pay a single fee, often higher compared to the 4-party model. — 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐅𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐭 𝐏𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐞 (4-Party vs 3-Party Model) 👉 4-𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 ► The Issuing Bank, Issuer, issues a debit/credit cards to its customer.  ► The cardholder wants to buy a product and swipes the credit card at the Point of Sale (POS) terminal ► The POS terminal sends the transaction to the Acquirer that provided the terminal (a token is shared) ► The Acquirer sends the transaction to the card network who sends the transaction to the Issuer for approval ► The Issuer freezes the money if the transaction is approved. The approval or rejection is sent back to the acquirer, and POS. Funds are then transferred. 👉 3-𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 — The first 3 steps are the same… but not step 4 ► American Express and Discover Financial Services perform here the function of Acquirer, Issuer and Card Network. This is so called closed loop networks are more efficient with all functions processed in one place ► In recent years the closed loop networks have partnered with issuers and acquirers to scale their circulations ► The approval or rejection is sent back to the acquirer, then to the POS terminal. The funds are then transferred — 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬: ► In 2023, U.S. merchants paid ~$224B in fees for accepting card payments (interchange, network, and processor fees combined). ► U.S. merchants would have saved $49B in 2023 if fees had remained at 2009 levels. ► In Europe, 45% of the Merchant Discount Rates (MDR) are attributable to interchange fees — 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐃𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬: ► Visa & Mastercard are payment networks, not issuers. They partner with banks and financial institutions to offer credit, debit, and prepaid cards.  ► Both are widely accepted in over 200 countries. The main difference lies in their rewards and offers (depending on issuer). ► American Express is both a card issuer and a payment network. This gives AMEX more control over customer service and rewards programs, often making it a premium choice ► While AMEX is accepted in fewer locations than Visa and Mastercard, it offers exclusive perks for its users. — Source: CMSPI - https://lnkd.in/gCA_GueQ ► Sign up to The Payments Brews ☕️: https://lnkd.in/g5cDhnjC  ► Connecting the dots in payments... & Marcel van Oost

  • graphical user interface, application
Ihor Hrabovych

Fintech Strategy Architect

4mo

Arthur Bedel 💳 ♻️, Visa and Mastercard use a 4-party model (cardholder, issuer, merchant, acquirer), mostly acting as networks rather than issuing banks. American Express runs a 3-party (closed-loop) system, handling issuing, acquiring, and the network function in-house, which can yield higher merchant fees but more control over customer experience. While Visa and Mastercard dominate acceptance globally, Amex’s premium perks and unified oversight appeal to higher-spending segments. Ultimately, the real difference is in how each model structures fees, partnerships, and customer rewards.

Oriol Pons

Payments, Cards & Digital Banking Executive | Serial Intrapreneur

4mo

Visa accepted in 200 countries vs MC accepted in 210. Arthur Bedel 💳 ♻️ does the source specify the country gap? I was not able to find a country/territory that accepts one and not the other. Thx

Neeraj Singh

Card Payments • Digital Transformation • Blogger

4mo

Arthur - Nice graphical presentation. However this is a partial info. In case of Discover, it is not always a 3 party model. This is the case only when both Network and Issuers are the same i.e. Discover acting as a Network and Discover acting as an Issuing/Acquiring Bank. Also, this is applicable only in US as Discover as a Bank has its presence only in US. For rest of the world, Discover acts as a Network. Discover works with other Acquirers and other issuers as well where it acts similar to Visa and Mastercard. Thanks.

Gene Haba Jr

Inspiring Creativity While Empowering Leadership Philanthropy Service

4mo

A new tokenized model is coming for closed/open-loop systems.

Benjamin Tuloup

Problématiques paiement Globales OU Locales .. Sur tous les sujets Orchestration, Acquisition, Optimisation & Acceptation, Omnicanal, Crypto, Emission, Cashout, Marketplace, Forex …

4mo

That’s Lovely to see CB scheme ;) !

Utsav Gambhir, MBA

Payments | Strategy | Partnerships | Product Management | MBA | Proven success at identifying growth opportunities and finding data-backed solutions

4mo

Would be more accurate if you could adjust the the above flow to account for Amex/Discover cards issued by their partner issuers. Both have strong partnerships globally.

Baraa Safaa Ali

Head of Payment Experience @ Amazon | Bar Raiser | Product Management | Podcast Host

4mo

Thanks for sharing this deep dive Arthur Bedel 💳 ♻️ , one questions, when using onus model of processing, will this be considered a 3party model?

Chandan Maruthi

Helping Support Teams - Boost Productivity - With AI Agents

1mo

This is a very good analysis, I always wondered how these platforms were different from each other.

Like
Reply
Nitin Kadam

Lead Network Administrator - Data Center and Cloud Network Services

4mo

Very informative

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics