🎉 Happy #PeerReviewWeek! 👥 For publishers and editors, a robust peer review process is non-negotiable. It protects the reputation of your journal and the credibility of the research you publish. 🆔 ORCID helps ensure that the peer review process is more transparent and efficient—two essentials for maintaining the high standards to build more trust in research. Learn more here 👉 https://lnkd.in/etPB9rBZ #ORCID #AcademicPublishing #ScholComms Peer Review Week

Peer review is the foundation of trustworthy research. It’s the process where experts assess the quality, validity, and originality of work before publication, safeguarding the integrity of scholarly communication. ✅ Improves research through constructive feedback ✅ Identifies errors and gaps ✅ Encourages collaboration and connection It’s not perfect, but it’s essential. That’s why we’re working to strengthen it through transferable peer review systems, reviewer training and guidance, and greater recognition of reviewers’ contributions. This week, we celebrate the people and practices that keep research reliable. https://ow.ly/iLGF50WY7aW #PRW2025

Why become a peer reviewer? Peer review lets researchers give back while sharpening their own skills. Learn how to get involved and support strong Canadian research 📖▶️ https://ow.ly/R8Ks50WVNgm #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025

Why become a peer reviewer? Peer review lets researchers give back while sharpening their own skills. Learn how to get involved and support strong Canadian research 📖▶️ https://ow.ly/o2UE50WVNnQ #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025

It's Peer Review Week! Despite their invaluable expertise and thoughtful feedback, peer reviewers often go unrecognized and are not formally acknowledged in publications. This raises important questions like what makes participating in peer review worthwhile, and can this process be improved? Jokūbas Leikauskas (Editor, BioInsights) spoke to a panel of experts about: ✍️Their experiences participating in the BioInsights peer review process ✍️The value to authors of constructive feedback ✍️Importance of independent peer review in upholding the integrity of scientific literature. Read the full expert roundtable here: https://lnkd.in/gPrGHRin #PRW2025 #PeerReviewWeek Peer Review Week

Why become a peer reviewer? Peer review lets researchers give back while sharpening their own skills. Learn how to get involved and support strong Canadian research 📖▶️ https://ow.ly/eyoF50WVNps #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025

One of the biggest challenges in peer review isn’t the process itself—it’s the selection of reviewers. Too often, requests land with scholars outside their expertise, leaving both the reviewer and the author dissatisfied. What if every paper could be intelligently matched with the right reviewer—someone whose strengths truly align with the subject? At PageMajik, we’ve built an algorithm that makes this possible, increasing both trust and incentive in the peer review process. I’m curious: what’s been your biggest frustration with peer review—time, quality, or alignment of expertise? Drop by the Frankfurter Buchmesse, find us at Hall 4.0, Stand A38 and let's have a chat. #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicResearch #PublishingInnovation #ResearchIntegrity #FrankfurtBookFair2025

Why become a peer reviewer? Peer review lets researchers give back while sharpening their own skills. Learn how to get involved and support strong Canadian research 📖▶️ https://ow.ly/1s4150WVNki #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025

Everyone deserves a peer review process that recognises and supports different ways of thinking. It's why we're trialling a new peer review pilot to support neurodiverse researchers. With the support of our new advisory board, we'll be looking into how to make publishing more accessible and inclusive by co-creating new solutions. From transparency to clear expectations, and more accessible policies, each will consider the different experiences neurodiverse researchers may face. Read more about the trial via the link below. And if you're an Emerald Editor and would like to get involved, please get in touch! https://bit.ly/3VVPZWY Huge thanks to our advisory board members - we’re excited for what’s ahead. Rob Edwards, Dr. Karen Perham-Lippman, CDP, Dr Sharon Zivkovic, Melea Press, William E. Donald, Verity Chester, Jo Howorth, David Wilkinson and Adrian Stanley. #PeerReview #PRW25

🔍 As we kick off Peer Review Week 2025, here’s a thought-provoking perspective from Ashutosh Ghildiyal (Integra) on #Editor’s_Café: 👉 What might scholarly publishing look like if publishers no longer managed peer review? Would such a shift usher in greater transparency, autonomy, and innovation—or expose vulnerabilities that risk undermining the very trust peer review is built on? In his article, Ashutosh explores both sides of this pressing question, reflecting on the promises of decentralization and the challenges of sustaining a fair, rigorous, and accountable peer review ecosystem. 📖 Read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/epay2vPA 💭 What’s your take? Could community-driven and technology-enabled models truly replace publishers in managing peer review, or is collaboration the better way forward? ✍️ Interested in sharing your perspective on Editor’s Café? Write to us at acse@theacse.com. #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025 #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #ACSE #EditorsCafe