From LiveOps to LiveValue — How Quimbi.ai Lifts LTV The problem: Calendar-driven LiveOps (fixed events, generic offers, siloed systems) creates promo fatigue and shallow engagement. Revenue is still concentrated in VIPs, but the “middle class” of spenders now matters just as much. Quimbi’s answer: a real-time LiveValue loop Observe → Predict → Orchestrate → Learn Observe: unify gameplay, economy, support, and store signals into a living profile. Predict: per-player churn hazard, purchase probability, fatigue risk, best next reward. Orchestrate (in-session): save-plays, elastic bundles, difficulty nudges, reward swaps—only when uplift clears a threshold. Learn: every action is an experiment; trim promo waste and feed results back into the profile. Where it acts (surgically): Progress friction: insert micro-quests, “progress guarantee” bundles, or one-fight difficulty nudges. Energy/pacing: time-shifted top-ups, skip-gates for high drop-risk cohorts. Store hesitation: switch to price-to-completion or transparent pity floors. Social loops: purpose-based squad and guild recommendations. Event fatigue: shrink objectives or defer to a better session window. Metrics that move LTV: Monetization: ARPDAU, ARPPU, payer conversion, promo waste, elasticity index. Engagement: TT2S (time-to-second-session), session length, TTMP (time-to-meaningful-progress), churn hazard. Trust: refunds/chargebacks, friction complaints, fairness delta. Purpose: purpose score (mastery + guild impact + narrative contributions), creator/leader influence. VIPs/whales—without 2014 tactics: Real-time tiering, portfolio-wide recognition, purposeful roles (unlock zones/events), built-in spending controls and fraud protection. Middle-tier monetization via micro-progress bundles and earned cosmetics. Typical 60-day lifts: ↑ ARPDAU, ↑ session length & return rates, ↑ purpose/guild completions, ↓ refunds & friction complaints. Notable references: industry analyses on whale economics (e.g., Swrve/VentureBeat), KPI primers from GameAnalytics, and LiveOps guidance from Google Play/Unity.
Love seeing new strategies for tackling promo fatigue and boosting middle-tier spenders' involvement. 😊
The focus on lessening event fatigue shows a great understanding of player needs and behaviors in the gaming scene.
Curious about the results after 60 days; would love to see some case studies or testimonials from users who implemented this. ✅
It's impressive how data-driven these improvements seem, especially with purpose scores contributing to final decisions.👌
The real-time LiveValue loop sounds like a smart way to keep players engaged without overwhelming them. 👌
A thoughtful approach towards energy pacing and pricing models could greatly influence long-term player satisfaction.
Quimbi’s methods for reducing churn hazard show that they prioritize sustainable player engagement over quick wins. Nice share! 😊
Great share!
What an innovative approach to addressing user engagement and LTV. Excited to see how this evolves. 🤩
FrontSpin -3X Your Live Conversations
2moReally interested in the metrics Quimbi.ai is using—engagement indicators like TT2S and TTMP are crucial for success. Great share!