"AI-first" corporate strategy: different views

An idealogical menu for "AI-first" corporate strategy posts. Rationalist: "Focusing on a specific tool is silly; staff will naturally adopt tools that make their jobs easier. Reward efficiency, not tool adoption." Optimist: "The payoff curve for adopting new tools has a 'trough' of inefficiency; if we don't push staff to experiment (and offer space to fail), we will not make it to a higher-efficiency future." Marxist: "Management would like to cut labor costs and as soon as efficiency improves, layoffs will follow. On top of that, they seek to alienate us from our labor." Accelerationist: "Improvements to productivity won't lead to layoffs; they will increase wages AND increase output. There's no shortage of valuable "work" in the world and we will simply do it faster." Determinist: "Staff and companies that don't adopt AI tools will be left behind. Regardless of how you feel about the ethics or experience, opting-out is not an option. Let's get it over with."

View organization page for Duolingo

830,521 followers

👇🏽 Below is an all-hands email from our CEO, Luis von Ahn – we are going to be AI-first. Just like how betting on mobile in 2012 made all the difference, we’re making a similar call now. This time the platform shift is AI. What doesn't change: We will remain a company that cares deeply about its employees.

  • No alternative text description for this image

Your Luddite is just doing Marxism. They’re not NECESSARILY the same.

Surrealist: “All tools are already inside us. I asked Claude to edit a spreadsheet and it wept openly. A dolphin gave our quarterly OKRs five stars. We are free.”

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories