LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. You can update your choices at any time in your settings.
🙌 The 1+Million Genomes (1+MG) Initiative is shaping the future of personalised medicine in Europe.
📹 In this interview, Gianpiero Cavalleri, the Genomic Data Infrastructure Ireland lead 🇮🇪, explains:
🔵 How cross-border collaboration in #genomics helps improve #PersonaliseMedicine and disease prevention
🔵 How the 1+Million Genomes (1+MG) Initiative is being implemented in Ireland
🔵 How GDI Ireland Node ensures patient and public involvement, data security and consent
#1MillionGenomes#EUHealth#HealthInnovation
The One Plus Million Genomes Initiative
is a declaration by the European Union in 2018 that recognises the increased
digitisation of our healthcare system and also the opportunities provided
by genomics, which in combination, can create an environment for more
precision medicine through research and in our healthcare system. Data reuse is critical in genomics and perhaps
the starting point is to understand that although genomics is used relatively
frequently in our healthcare system today, all those discoveries have emerged
from the research domain. We need to create discovery in research
and that's translated to the healthcare system. Now to create these discoveries,
reuse of data is fundamental. Genomics and identifying causes for rare diseases
and cancers is all about pattern recognition. So the more data you have, the greater your ability
to recognise what is normally present in a population from what is pathogenic
and potentially disease causing. So we need large data sets to do this. With time these data sets
are created and assembled, but you need to be able to reuse the data
and reanalyse it to be able to identify these patterns. In terms of data security,
there is European legislation, but there's also local legislation that will
guide the requirements in each country. So we're working carefully
with experts in Ireland and with citizens who are contributing
to the project to understand the local requirements
for data security here. There's flexibility around how the infrastructure
is built and deployed in Ireland. So there is an overarching infrastructure
from our European partners, but how we deploy it in Ireland
will be dependent on local needs. So that can be local needs as
dictated by legislation, but also the needs of
our stakeholders here, citizens, researchers, clinicians and so on. So we're in the process now of engaging closely
with these stakeholders to understand those needs so we can deploy the system here in Ireland
in a way that fits local Irish needs. Partnering with patients and the public
is fundamental to an initiative like this. And in this context we are partnering with
a diverse group of patients and the public across all aspects of the projects
and working with them to really realise the success of this initiative. What scientists gain from such
partnerships is an understanding of the lived experience of a particular disease
or indeed a certain aspect. You have to remember that scientists,
especially data scientists, they're working day-to-day with data. They work closely with colleagues, but traditionally it's quite rare that they would
actually work closely with patients. And this might sound odd,
but that has been reality. So the real value for scientists
is hearing that patient voice, hearing the lived experience,
understanding their needs, which can be sometimes different
to what's important to a scientist. So it's understanding the needs of patients
and the public so that they shape, in this case, an infrastructure in a manner that fits
the needs of that stakeholder group. And in my opinion, this is absolutely fundamental
to the success of the project. In Ireland, it is the choice of the individual
whether or not they wish to have their data put into this infrastructure,
so it would be very much grounded in consent. And that means the person can decide,
obviously, whether they want their data in there, but they can also decide to
have their data withdrawn. It is entirely within their control. And all of this consent
will be based in national legislation, so the health research regulations,
but also European GDPR legislation. Now, there can be different levels of consent. For example, an individual might
decide for their data to be used or one particular type of study
and not another. Now, the level or granularity of that consent
is going to emerge from our engagement with patients and the public around their needs. What do they want in terms of levels
of consent or their different choices? So that's part of the importance of public
and patient involvement in this project, to understand patient and public needs
so we can design the consent process to make it as impactful as possible. Specific examples of how patients
and the public have already been involved in this initiative in Ireland
would include, for example, representing the patient in public voice
on the steering committee of the project. So we would report to
the steering committee regularly. Patients and the public are on the committee,
so they have, they understand what's going on,
they can help guide the project. They are also involved in
different elements of the project, for example,
understanding use cases, creating and understanding
use cases for the project. So by that we mean examples of
where this infrastructure would be used
day-to-day in Irish research. So we have created multiple different use cases
and patients and the public are helping us prioritise
those use cases to understand where we should put
the greatest emphasis and how. They're also involved in how
we communicate the project. So for example, if we're creating text
for a press release or text for a website, we sit down with our patient and public
involvement group and we draft text, we allow them to read it,
they provide feedback that allows us to tweak the text
and get it in the best possible format. Another example would be risks. So we sit down with patients and the public
and we get risks about the project from their particular perspective
and when we understand these, we can put safeguards in place
to help reduce and offset them. There is incredible benefit
that we've already derived from genomics, positive benefit for society and that we can
continue to derive into the future. How fast we can realise this is dependent on
the infrastructure in place and you can almost think of this
as roads across Europe and beyond. You know, we've invested in the past heavily
on road infrastructure, on airports and so on. Our society is increasingly becoming digitised. So this is an opportunity for us to get
really good impactful infrastructure in place for genomics that relates to healthcare
that ultimately can translate to the clinic and have benefit for us
as citizens and individuals.