Few years ago we released analysis of lit market quality across US/EU/Japan/Korea. 4 years later nothing changed, all conclusions still stand. https://lnkd.in/egKeN4Qd
Would be interesting to see a breakdown by price level of the equity due to different execution cost calculations in those markets, though I am kinda assuming your chart intends to illustrate lit book depth with a preference for immediacy.
Interesting perspective. Not everyone will agree that a $100M company in the US is, in some sense, equivalent to a $100M company in Korea, though. Different asset managers solve for different objectives, but in essence, they all allocate clients' funds. The average size of a listed company in Japan is 1/10 of that of a company in the US, if I am not mistaken. Korea - 1/20. It seems that allocating $1 billion to the US market is still significantly less expensive than allocating it to the Japanese or Korean markets.
Alexander Gerko Surprising how little has changed, and perhaps telling. Always enjoy these data-led corrections to the narrative. Curious if you think the next round of “reform” will come from new market entrants… or if it’s game-set-match for the incumbents.
Impressive work, Gerko! Releasing this analysis a few years ago clearly laid a strong foundation for ongoing insights. Looking forward to seeing more from your team.
This is an interesting picture. Does it vary when one considers the orderbook at different points in the trading day (specifically, near the close)?