1 Minute Reads | Catching A Vibe "Vibe coding" is rewriting software development. Instead of writing code, developers simply describe what they want, and AI generates it. Turning anyone into a technical founder. Recent standouts include: - Lovable: $1B ARR in 12 months - Replit: $2.8M to $150M ARR in under a year - Anything: $2M ARR in two weeks But there are a few things I am watching in the space. I believe there remains significant progress to be made before nontechnical users can reliably create products that are ready for deployment. Also, while early adopters are excited to experiment with new products retention metrics over the next 6-12 months will provide insight into the long term winners. The companies solving deployment complexity (databases, payments, authentication) will separate from the prompt-to-prototype crowd. Here is where I see the democratization of technical skill. Let me know your favorite platform or app built on one of these systems.
How "Vibe Coding" is Revolutionizing Software Development
More Relevant Posts
-
Great to see momentum building in this space. In the era of “vibe coding,” it’s all too easy to end up with spaghetti code and AI-slob. I’ve long believed that the path forward isn’t just throwing agents at the problem, but grounding software development in clear specifications and automated checks and balances from design through implementation. Spec-driven development offers exactly that: a way to turn intent into reliable software, where automation isn’t just powerful but trustworthy, auditable, and consistent. Excited to see Codeplain leading the charge on this new paradigm. 🚀
I recently sat down for a chat with Paul S. of AI Native Dev. Paul expanded on our discussion and provided an excellent overview of the spec-driven vision that we at *codeplain , along with a few other pioneers, see as the future of software development. If you’re curious about what we’re trying to achieve at *codeplain , Paul’s post offers the best possible overview. https://lnkd.in/dWYfNyv3
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Developer productivity isn’t just about creating more code, faster. It's about engineering faster and smarter with codebase context and quality. Great dev teams scale by keeping standards high, reducing tech debt, and helping junior devs contribute meaningfully to complex systems. Hear more from Nnenna Ndukwe about how codebase context and multi-agent workflows turn rapid output into maintainable, production-ready software. 👉 https://lnkd.in/eFxhPnkk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Biggest Misconception About No-Code Many people still believe that no-code tools are “just for beginners.” That’s the biggest myth in tech today. Here’s the truth: ✅ No-code is not a replacement for coding. ✅ It’s a force multiplier for builders, entrepreneurs, and engineers. Why it’s not just for beginners: 1️⃣ Speed at Scale No-code lets teams prototype, test, and launch faster than traditional coding alone. Startups and enterprises use it to validate ideas in days, not months. 2️⃣ Accessibility Non-technical team members can now build apps, dashboards, or automations without waiting on developers. That’s not “beginner,” that’s empowerment. 3️⃣ Integration with Code The most powerful no-code projects are hybrid a no-code front-end powered by custom code and automations in the background. 4️⃣ Used by Pros Some of the world’s top companies (and even developers) use no-code to save time, cut costs, and scale faster. No-code doesn’t mean “beginner.” It means faster outcomes with the right mindset. For me, no-code is like adding a superpower to my engineering toolkit. It’s not about replacing code it’s about choosing the fastest path to impact. What’s the most advanced project you’ve ever seen built with no-code?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Just spent two weeks testing "vibe coding" tools - aka building apps with prompts instead of actual code. Remember when you needed to be a code wizard to build anything worth using on the web? Not anymore. These tools let you type in plain English what you want, and they spit out working apps. Some even handle security, databases, and user auth without you diving into technical weeds. I tested about 15 different platforms and found some clear winners: - Lovable: Most balanced for beginners - Bolt: Great flexibility with useful integrations - Cursor: Perfect when you need to debug or customize - v0: Shows you what's happening behind the scenes If you're a founder with a great idea but lacking technical skills, these tools could be your way in. No, they won't replace proper engineering for production-grade software, but they'll get you to a working prototype faster than you'd believe. The startup landscape is changing - you don't need to wait for a technical co-founder anymore to test if your idea has legs. Have you tried any of these tools yet? What was your experience? https://lnkd.in/eXYvrCKx
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“The role of developers is evolving: the high code developer is moving from executor to coach, quality controller and architect.” IG&H’s Niels van Lieshout shares his insights on Techzine.nl. Software development is faster than ever, thanks to #LowCode and #AI. Sometimes it seems as if anyone can build an app with just a few clicks... platforms like GitHub and Copilot help you develop software without having to code every line yourself. 💡But does this mean that experienced high-code developers are becoming redundant? No. In fact, the opposite is true: High-code developers are indispensable in this low-code era. Check out the full article 👉 https://lnkd.in/gS3ez543 (please note the content is in Dutch)
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Water cooler chats with Matt Barr: Me: “We’ve been flying the last few weeks. Spec-driven development is a lot of fun.” Matt: “It is! I was talking with some friends at WeCode KC about it. I told them I spend most of my time writing Markdown and iterating on the spec, then let Codex handle the coding for me. They said, ‘And that’s fun to you?!’ I was like—yeah, I mean, it is the job. I get to focus on the fun parts of coding, write way more working code, and don’t go home exhausted and binge junk food at the end of the day. The satisfaction loop is awesome.” Spec-driven development isn’t just another overhyped “vibecoding” idea. We’ve been practicing it as a team for the last few months in a professional environment, with rigorous *human* and AI-assisted code review. Honestly, I think it’s under-hyped. Spec-driven development gives you: - Less developer burnout, more satisfaction - 2–5× productivity gains (mileage may vary) - Freedom to think more holistically and creatively than ever before - Stronger team alignment through documentation (where, historically, docs tend to be second-class in Agile) - A tighter development lifecycle: more feedback, faster iteration When I made the transition to being AI-first, there was a temptation to let AI do my work. I was stuck in the mindset that my job was to write code. But my real job is to solve problems and design solutions. Now that I’ve made that mental shift, there’s no going back. My work is more exciting and satisfying than ever. What a time to be a full-stack dev. Never delegate your thinking to AI. If emotions are data, then you have context AI will never have. Stay in touch with them. Trust your instincts. Build cool shit. mySidewalk is cooking up some big things—I can’t wait for you all to see them.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Hardest Part of Software Development (And It’s Not Writing Code) My passion for coding started back in high school. I still remember getting programming exercises and sitting down the very same day, working late into the evening just to see the results. That continued throughout my computer science degree—long nights of coding, fueled not by deadlines, but by love for the craft. As a developer, I was always thrilled whenever I got a new task from my manager. Every line of code I wrote brought me joy. Over time, as I gained more experience and moved into team lead and then development manager roles, I realized something important: building something from scratch is the easy part. With today’s tools - and now with AI - it’s even easier. But let’s put AI aside for a moment. The real challenge in software development isn’t creating new features - it’s debugging. Stepping into someone else’s code, untangling their logic, and chasing down elusive bugs. And when you finally find the issue, you often ask yourself: “What was this person thinking when he wrote this?” The funny thing is, when someone else later has to fix a bug in your code, they’ll probably ask themselves the same thing. That’s the beauty of coding: give the same task to three different developers, and you’ll get three completely different designs. The hardest and most rewarding part of our craft isn’t writing new code, but finding and fixing the tricky problems hidden in the old. AutomaticFlows team visit us at: www.automaticflows.com AutomaticFlows - Simple way to test rest services #SoftwareDevelopment #Debugging #CodingLife #Developers #TechInsights
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I get the same question almost daily: what’s different about Augment Code compared to all the other AI coding products? From the outside looking in, the space is crowded. It’s hard to understand which companies have longevity. New competitors and LLMs popping up weekly. 0-5M in days, 0-100M in months… The answer has a number of dimensions to it: - We’re singularly focused on Enterprise software engineers, not vibe coders working on 0-1 projects. - We invested 2+ years in stealth solving the hardest problem first - providing real time context understanding of codebases at massive scale and complexity. As codebase complexity increases, our differentiation shines. - Self-serve isn’t about the revenue. It isn’t our intended profit center. It’s where developers around the world can experience our context engine and realize the potential in codebases where other products fail. - We believe the majority of AI’s impact in software engineering will occur outside of the IDE. This is why we didn’t fork an IDE. We built infrastructure to meet organizations where they are today, and evolve with them as they drive automation across the full SDLC using our platform. Augment is unequivocally the best product for professional software developers. Our win rate is 80%+ in the field. And more importantly, we’re building long term business relationships to help our customers transform their engineering culture and processes. Visit https://lnkd.in/gPysZips to learn more.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As engineers it is critical that we differentiate between 0 to 1 AI coding tools used by enthusiasts, which generate AI slop and tech debt, versus professional tools like Augment Code that you can actually rely on to ship production code in a large, messy million file codebase. This distinction doesn’t get enough attention in the question “is AI all a hype?”. Once you start using a professional AI coding tools like Augment daily and it cuts your onboarding time from 3 months to 3 weeks, it’s hard to deny that it’s going to transform software engineering more than any developer tool in the last couple of decades.
I get the same question almost daily: what’s different about Augment Code compared to all the other AI coding products? From the outside looking in, the space is crowded. It’s hard to understand which companies have longevity. New competitors and LLMs popping up weekly. 0-5M in days, 0-100M in months… The answer has a number of dimensions to it: - We’re singularly focused on Enterprise software engineers, not vibe coders working on 0-1 projects. - We invested 2+ years in stealth solving the hardest problem first - providing real time context understanding of codebases at massive scale and complexity. As codebase complexity increases, our differentiation shines. - Self-serve isn’t about the revenue. It isn’t our intended profit center. It’s where developers around the world can experience our context engine and realize the potential in codebases where other products fail. - We believe the majority of AI’s impact in software engineering will occur outside of the IDE. This is why we didn’t fork an IDE. We built infrastructure to meet organizations where they are today, and evolve with them as they drive automation across the full SDLC using our platform. Augment is unequivocally the best product for professional software developers. Our win rate is 80%+ in the field. And more importantly, we’re building long term business relationships to help our customers transform their engineering culture and processes. Visit https://lnkd.in/gPysZips to learn more.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Is "vibe coding" the future of software development? While the initial hype is seductive, the magic can quickly fade in projects with more than a couple of files. Our new blog article explores a core issue with vibe coding and presents a practical process to make it work for you. Check it out and let us know your thoughts! https://lnkd.in/gWXuGahb
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development