Obsolete Data Modeling Techniques: Why They Fail Today

View profile for Mustafa Qizilbash

Open for Work/Opportunities | CDMP | Solution Architect | Data Architect | IT Project Manager | Agentic AI | GenAI | 3x Top Voice on LinkedIn

𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁#𝟳: 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 --> 𝗢𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀 🚨 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆. Some were powerful in their time, but in today’s Data & AI landscape… they’ve become obsolete. 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 the test of scale, flexibility, or modern architectures include:  • NIAM  • ORM  • Hierarchical Data Modelling  • Network Data Modelling  • Object-Oriented Data Modelling 𝗪𝗵𝘆? Because today’s demands — streaming, real-time analytics, federated architectures, lakehouse, and AI-driven use cases — require models that can adapt, scale, and integrate seamlessly. The world has moved to 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁-𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱, 𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗹𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀. Legacy methods can’t keep up. How are you handling outdated techniques in your stack? Would you trust an agentic AI to refactor or re-model legacy designs? Agree or challenge — I’d love your lens on this. Seen this in your org? How did you approach it? #DataModeling #DataArchitecture #AI #Lakehouse #DataEngineering

Mustafa Qizilbash

Open for Work/Opportunities | CDMP | Solution Architect | Data Architect | IT Project Manager | Agentic AI | GenAI | 3x Top Voice on LinkedIn

1mo
Marco Wobben

CaseTalk - Business Information Modeling | Author | Public Speaker | Engineer | Trainer | UTC+1

1mo

Fact oriented modeling started at NIAM, and both ORM and FCO-IM evolved from that. The supporting tools evolved further. E.g. CaseTalk, supporting FCO-IM, builds a federated information model, linked to texts and paragraphs, hooked up lineage from source systems, visualizing it as UML, ERD, ER, Knowledge Graph, and generate xml, JSON, SQL, Data vault,, graphML, Python and java, have proven it is not legacy yet by a long shot.

Ronald Baan 🕊️

VP Marketing DAMA International and President DAMA NL | Trainer and Mentor in Data Management | CDMP

1mo

I appreciate your overview, but find that there is overlap in techniques between the rows, which makes it somewhat confusing. In addition I do not agree that hierarchical is obsolete. In a document db environment with XML and even JSON, there will be many hierarchical data structures. It is good to show that there are many data modeling techniques and their use should increase, because that is the only way to get clarity what data we have.

Dan Blake

I help heads of data and technology practices at non-audit global consulting firms grow revenues in excess of £50M+ contributing to sales and delivering high-value data and technology programmes, CDAIO Advisor, FCC SME

1mo

You choose the right modelling technique for the task required. Not everything is streaming, real-time etc - often companies get there through the prior modelling steps or monolithic architectures first. The myth of the modern architecture has been often to sell new services and many of these methods are not new. Data streaming architectures have been around for 30+ years. Lineage techniques have existed for a long time. What has happened is a central re-codification and naming where architects often already were doing things like data vaults before it had a name. I often still see hierarchy data sets or OOM at an application layer. What has changed is the place on the hype curve for these techniques. I would rather someone understands what is required and does not over engineer a solution as this comes at additional costs.

Tim Biedenkapp

Architect, bridge builder, catalyst for data centric thinking

1mo

I do like the philosophy: „store the data as you would like to read it“ With modern file formats and databases, this is possible. No need for super complex models and the performance is given.

You do realise that NIAM and ORM are fact-oriented methodologies, right?

Rémy Fannader

Author of 'Enterprise Architecture Fundamentals', Founder & Owner of Caminao

1mo

FYI: ORM is fact-oriented and very effective once you understand the difference between facts and data. OO modelling is a widely accepted standard once you understand the difference business and systems.

Incorrect regarding OODM, and this is actually reaffirmed in one of your slides. While it may not be used for database design in the traditional sense, it's alive and well in terms of data exchange - just take a look at #FHIR resources and associated APIs. To design the resources correctly requires #datamodeling #digitalhealth

NIAM and ORM should not be in this list

Maarten van der Heijden

Data Architect at Tata Steel BV, designer of data constructs.

1mo

Funny thing to me is that the document database has some characteristics similar to the hierarchical and Network databases. Moving on just like NIAM and ORM to new forms and ways of expressing, but not that different. The OO data storage has never really found solid ground as far as I remember, but then again, I may have dwelt in a bubble.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories