Digital Twin in Computational Biology: Your Thoughts

View profile for Pancy Lwin, Ph.D.

Computational scientist passionate about GRNs, GNNs, and foundation models. Driven to build multiscale models as a path towards Digital Twins.

Quick Questions for my Computational Community 🎯 Most of my connections here are in Computational Biology, Bioinformatics, PK/PD, QSP, and AI/ML—so I’d love to hear your thoughts! (And Math Modelers and Biophysics Experts) 1️⃣ When was the first time you heard the term Digital Twin? 2️⃣ What was your first impression of the concept? Has that impression of DT changed over time? 3️⃣ Why should a Digital Twin be considered an alive mechanistic model that can answer perturbations or what-if scenarios? 4️⃣ How should AI/ML models interact with or be integrated into Digital Twins? 5️⃣ In 50 years (when I’ll be in my 80s 😅), do you think Digital Twins will be routinely used to guide medical treatments? Happy Friday, everyone! 🥳 Looking forward to your answers!

Ashita Jawali

Bioinformatician @ KDHE | CMU Alum | Computational Biologist | Genomics, Bioinformatics & Machine Learning

3w

Just yesterday, I came across the term "Digital Twin" while reading a research paper. It's fascinating to learn that these are virtual, personalized models that mirror biological systems. I'm still exploring the concept, but it feels like Digital Twins have immense potential to evolve and transform how we approach mechanistic modeling and medical decision-making.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories