AI without humans creates average at scale. Every AI-generated success story has a deep human fingerprint. The viral campaign? Human chose the concept. The breakthrough design? Human directed the visual. The perfect copy? Human refined the voice. AI generates. Humans decide what matters. But let’s look at this from both sides… Where humans beat algorithms: ✓ Knowing when to break the rules ✓ Reading cultural moments ✓ Understanding what resonates vs what converts ✓ Deciding what story to tell Where AI beats humans: ✓ Speed of iteration ✓ Volume of options ✓ Technical execution ✓ Pattern recognition The magic happens at the handoff points. Human sets creative direction. AI explores every possibility. Human curates the breakthrough ideas. AI perfects the execution.
100% Human ✊
Well said Pete Sena AI is an ability human should and can use to levarage and scale their own thoughts and ideas. I feel it with writing, it's not about whether you write with AI or not, it's how you use it to levarage what you already have in mind. What makes people worry is another FOMO, in a super fast world (at least for now).
I agree with you on this - the best results happen when humans guide the vision and AI helps explore the possibilities.
This post is a reminder: AI is a tool, humans are the artists Pete Sena
Yes! I just wrote an article along the same lines. AI should allow us to be more connected and be the human in the loop. If we do it right, we become more human. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/more-human-future-let-ai-handle-work-so-humans-can-clayton-rodgers-rttnc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&utm_campaign=share_via
Couldn’t agree more. It’s never human vs AI, it’s human with AI
This is the perfect way to frame it. The AI is the engine for options. The human provides the judgment. But the most valuable work isn't just the moment of human curation. It's the design of the system that validates which of the AI's options actually drives a business outcome. The moat isn't the human with the good taste. It's the human who builds the data-driven engine to prove their taste is profitable.
Some times normalization is good. Other times, not so much. I like normalizing code style. I dislike normalizing art. Code is art, but let's not get too creative with style - the old 'I can write the whole program in one line' trick is played out. As is 'comments are for newbs', etc.
This is the balance we need to get right, not either/or, but both Pete Sena
AI Strategist | Helping 100,000+ Companies, Coaches & Creators Work Smarter, Scale Faster & Lead with AI | Keynote Speaker | Trainer | Pastor | Cultural Intelligence Expert
4dThe best AI work isn’t autonomous, it’s guided. Humans set the direction, AI multiplies possibilities.