The recent Court of Appeal decision in Barry v Anantharajah underscores that insurers should make reasonable settlement offers before trial – no matter how strong they believe their case to be. #TheSBAWay Read more by Morgan Cross here: http://bit.ly/3IIgjB8
Court of Appeal decision: insurers should make reasonable settlement offers
More Relevant Posts
-
Can scn be issued for multiple years? The Court held that issuing a single SCN covering more than one financial year is impermissible under the CGST Act, because each financial year is a distinct taxable unit, and the cause of action for each year arises separately. #scnissuedformultipleyears #questionoftheday #gstlitigation Advocate Kajol Soni
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Fort Lauderdale West Associate Amanda Wasserman and Partner Michael Rosenberg’s recent appellate win has helped shape Florida law on what constitutes summary judgment evidence. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed that an insured’s sworn statement (EUO) may be used as proper summary judgment evidence, strengthening insurers’ ability to defend coverage disputes. Read more about this decision here: https://buff.ly/K8KvgdI #CSKAppellate #InsuranceLaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
After setbacks in Belsner and Karatysz, firms challenging solicitors' fees are pivoting—now targeting ATE premiums via 'secret commission' claims. This webinar examines the Turner v Coupland Cavendish case and its path to the Court of Appeal. https://zurl.co/DHqXr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Stuart Gordon and Krystal Armstrong wrote, “Supreme Court Decision Limits Trustees’ Ability to Pursue Fraudulent Transfer Actions” for the Fall 2025 issue of USLAW NETWORK, Inc. Magazine. The article discusses a recent Supreme Court opinion that narrowed the sovereign immunity exception, effectively limiting the ability of a trustee to recover transfers from the government. Read the full article here https://lnkd.in/ekhWbP3C
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
After setbacks in Belsner and Karatysz, firms challenging solicitors' fees are pivoting—now targeting ATE premiums via 'secret commission' claims. This webinar examines the Turner v Coupland Cavendish case and its path to the Court of Appeal. https://zurl.co/tkAzz
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Georgia Court of Appeals recently clarified when UM carriers may face attorney’s fees under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-68. In Blazys v. McKnight, the court held that carriers defending in the name of the at-fault driver are not considered “parties” at trial and cannot be subject to fee awards. Read more in our latest client alert: https://scmh.live/yfruzwcb
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Raoul said the company has failed to comply with a regulatory examination into its nationwide business as part of an ongoing investigation that began in November 2024. The attorney general accused State Farm of drastically increasing its premiums in recent years.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BC’s Supreme Court has upheld a key rule in motor vehicle injury claims: plaintiffs must apply before incurring costs if they want to exceed the 6% disbursement cap. This decision reinforces cost control in litigation while preserving judicial discretion. Here's what it means for claimants, lawyers, and the future of ICBC-related cases. Read the full blog here: https://lnkd.in/grNFsHGD
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
When someone suffers a loss due to another’s act or omission and seeks monetary relief, such as for breach of contract or negligence, the Limitation Act 2010 (“the Act”) sets time limits for bringing such claims. These limits encourage claimants to take timely legal action. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/g-K-S6us
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Strict ERISA Exhaustion Requirement for Fiduciary-Breach Claims The Eleventh Circuit recently reaffirmed that ERISA plaintiffs must exhaust plan administrative remedies before filing fiduciary-breach or statutory claims in federal court—maintaining its long-standing rule from Mason v. Continental Group, Inc. This decision keeps the Eleventh Circuit in the minority among federal circuits, but a concurring opinion by Judge Jordan calls for reconsideration of Mason en banc. For practitioners, the takeaway is clear: exhaustion remains mandatory before bringing ERISA claims in this jurisdiction. 🔗 Read our summary linked in the comments.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development