This slide got me the VP of Marketing role. Okay, that’s a dramatic hook, but it did help seal the deal in my final interview. Why? Because it clearly articulates the objective and shows a system to answer “how.” I even heard execs repeat the objective back to me in follow-ups: “Build an audience, generate signals for sales actions, run coordinated plays.” I sat with this line for a long time. But for this role, at this company, this is the objective of marketing. Not all marketing teams will have the same one. And that’s exactly the point. This campaign system is a practical example of how I think about GTM. It’s integrated. It’s repeatable. It brings in outbound and sales coordination. If your marketing plan doesn’t include sales, and it’s not coordinated, you’re setting yourself up to fail. Sure, it looks simple on a slide. It’s not simple to do well. Am I running this exact system today? No. I’ve adjusted it as I’ve onboarded. But the foundation holds. → Define the objective. → Design a system that supports it. → Coordinate like hell. → Iterate & fine-tune. How are you thinking about GTM campaign systems?
Love this, Sidney Waterfall. It’s wild how underrated clarity still is. Everyone’s out here trying to sound smart when sounding clear is what actually gets remembered and repeated. You made your value obvious and actionable. That’s what sticks.
Love that this focuses on the system, not just the outputs. So many teams skip over the structure that actually enables great content to get shipped consistently.
In my last company, i heard a talk from one of the vcs about the concept of line of sight. That they were willing to invest more because they could see the progress the company was making and they could see it reach a certain pivotal milestone. While I dislike vc money, it did help see into the world of the executives. CEOs and CFOs most don't care if you run brand or performance, lead gen or demand gen. They just want to know be able to see the results from what you're planning - have a line of sight. Not a hope strategy, or possibly or increase potential, but see how doing a will accomplish b. this is where most internal marketing fails miserably. I like this framework. Do you mind if I use it?
Totally agree: a marketing strategy that ignores sales isn’t a system—it’s a silo. Love the focus on coordination, iteration, and adaptability. Would love to see a version of the updated system now that you’ve been in the seat a while. 🙂
Sidney Waterfall. This is THE way to communicate upwards. Obviously, this is an oversimplified visual of what actually takes place. However, for a person in a leadership position, this is the way they think, communicate, and visualize different systems or functions working together.
This is great!! Something I’ve only recently learned is marketing ourselves as marketers. Part of that is educating leadership on marketing in a clear way. We’ve always been told “keep it high level for the C-suite, board, investors, but that discounts our work and makes marketing just a large expense on the budget.
Co-founder & CEO @ Masset | Host @ Content Amplified Podcast (300+ episodes) | 1x IPO | Utah Business Editorial Advisory Board Member - tech, ai and startups | Marketing Award Winner | Husband | Father of 4 Boys | Utah
9moLove it. “Audience, signals, plays” cuts through a lot of noise and gets straight to what matters. It’s the kind of framework that not only helps shape strategy, but also makes it easier to get alignment across teams. Everyone can see where they fit and what they're working toward. I also appreciate how you tied this to the business outcomes. So often, marketing slides focus on tactics or channels without showing the bigger picture. This does the opposite — it shows how marketing becomes a growth driver, not just a support function. No surprise this helped you land the role.