I don’t accept the Terms & Conditions ◦ I know 3 things ◦ Wholly unimpressed ◦ spacer.gif and IE6 survivor ◦ Human-Centred Technologist ◦ I write, talk and joke about Tech, Policy & Social Impact. JD 12/2025.
Weird how tech bros with brain rot are pushing for AI to have human rights and yet humans don’t even have basic rights against AI. I think maybe we need to get our priorities straight.
chronically online Social Media Strategist & Content Creator 🤠 | mastering the art of digital storytelling and fueling organic social media growth, one impactful content piece at a time ✨
The fact that you don’t automatically own your own face, voice, and body in the age of AI is pretty scary 🫠 I’m all for using AI to boost creativity, productivity, and access but without regulation, this stops being innovation and starts being exploitation. Denmark’s move to grant citizens copyright over their own likeness is absolutely necessary. Tools can be helpful. Tech can be brilliant. But ownership should be non-negotiable. 📹 the_coding_wizard on IG
Not brain rot. Moral rot.
I don’t think anyone’s advocating that AI should have rights unless I’ve missed something. This particular law was so that you would benefit from use of your image. Let’s say someone clones your image and voice and uses it to promote a product or creates in a character that’s popular online and it generates revenue. This line would give you the right to send them assistance, desist, or to benefit financially from the use of your voice and image. I think Denmark’s on the right track. It’s probably the best way to deal with deep fakes and revenge porn in all these things that people are scared I can do.
💯 Agreed, I wrote an opinion article about this very situation in 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666389923002453
Owning the copyright to our own face, voice and body should be the bare minimum.
kinda wondering how this is being worded/positioned. Pretending to be a citizen of Denmark momentarily, and neverminding AI and deep fakes, can I now demand that you get my explicit permission befor recording or photographing me as with the security systems in every public place? can I demand takedowns of posta of my picture without permission from social media sites? how about royalties for ad vevenue derives from every view of my face? as much as I apreciate the desire to open a path to fight deep fakes, I am not a fan of bad legislation. give it a minute!
I think you might be optimistic. Yes, those parroting on about AI rights because they think it makes them sound like deep philosophers, they probably do have brain rot. But under that, I suspect a core that knows exactly what they are doing. Any "AI right", constitutes a legal benefit that AI owners have, and the rest of us don't.
This is already common law in the U.S., and most countries. It's simply not being honored nor having charges pressed against it. There's so many ways to actually act against the AI takeover. We need to start, not talk.
Women's rights first.
😂😂😂 we need a law for that? isn't that a given? we are living in the most stupid timeline.
Tech Lead at Unfold | Making the complex simple | Success not a service | Challenge everything
1mo> Weird how tech bros Not really. Everything is about being in service to them making profit, everything else is entirely arbitrary to them. Until you weaponise their tech on them. Then it's suddenly not allowed. Imagine if some of the people pushing this movement got deepfaked. Imagine the outrage that would suddenly manifest.