Agentic AI Comes into Focus: What We Learned from Q1 2025 Earnings
As AI gains significant traction in the enterprise, we’re analyzing quarterly earnings calls to better understand how key players both up and down the AI stack and across different sectors are adapting their strategies, products, and pricing models to compete.
In our 4Q24 report, companies were focused on pressure-testing AI in the enterprise. In 1Q25, we were surprised by how quickly the tune had shifted. AI has moved from an experiment to a core strategy across the tech stack, and almost every company is telling an AI story about their business.
As we did last quarter, we looked at 10 of the largest publicly-traded companies, 5 major cybersecurity and infrastructure software companies, and 4 US-based hyperscalers. Here are some of the takeaways that interested us the most.
Apps
Practically every company is embedding AI directly into its core products—and, with advances in reasoning models, they’re all racing to add autonomous agents to their roadmaps. As the market fills with AI apps, two major differentiators are emerging: exclusive access to unified customer data and the depth of in-house AI talent.
Embedding vs. standalone AI. Companies, particularly in the SMB and mid-market, are embedding AI into their core product suite as they try to get customers hooked on AI—which is a departure from the SKU-based experiments of the prior year. That said, companies generally offer more agentic products as standalone SKUs.
Billing by usage is on the rise. As companies embed AI into their products, they’re making the switch to usage-based billing very quickly. A common strategy is to give customers a taste of AI features included in their seat-based subscription and then charge on a consumption basis as they scale up usage.
Reasoning models set the stage for agents. Advances in reasoning models like OpenAI o3 and Grok4 promise to provide a step-change in productivity as they can handle complex, multi-step tasks. Agentic products typically require more intensive LLM usage and can demand higher prices—something to watch as more agents come to market.
Unified customer data favors incumbents. Incumbents are highlighting the value of unified customer data in their platforms, and some have even started to restrict data access for third-party apps in an attempt to lock out competitors. Many AI startups are building on top of core systems of record, and these aggressive actions may force earlier-stage companies to rethink their strategy.
Demand for great AI talent is white-hot. Driven in part by the perception of a more favorable regulatory stance on M&A from the current administration, M&A is emerging as a top method for turbocharging companies’ AI capabilities and competing in a broader talent war. In recent months, ServiceNow acquired Moveworks for $2.85B and Google acquired personnel from Windsurf for $2.4B.
Infrastructure
As most infrastructure companies continue to benefit from their vendors’ accelerated cloud and data migrations, they’re also moving away from folding AI support into their existing feature set in favor of building new products to support AI in deployment.
Infrastructure modernization surges as a big priority for customers. Many enterprises are re-initiating cloud migrations and upgrading data systems in order to effectively invest in AI, which is a big tailwind for infrastructure companies built around modern technology stacks.
Product suites expand to serve AI in deployment. The launch of new agentic capabilities has turbocharged this trend, as agents take actions without a human in the loop and create new security and monitoring problems.
AI agents augment the value prop of infrastructure companies. Infra companies are building AI add-ons to help analyze and activate the rich data sets created by their existing products. Similar to comments from last quarter, incumbents believe their access to a broad surface area will enable their agents to have the context and access to complete end-to-end tasks such as triaging a security threat and patching vulnerabilities.
Hyperscalers
Cloud providers continue to benefit from the AI boom, since they rent access to the GPUs that power AI models in training and inference. As demand continues to explode, they’re all vying for a larger share of the pie and trying to differentiate by highlighting the capabilities of their various model platforms and engaging in strategic partnerships with AI labs.
Demand for compute is still white-hot. Hyperscalers are still struggling to keep up despite massive investments in capacity.
Emphasis on both broad model availability and success of first-party models in given categories. Hyperscalers understand that GPUs will become more available over time and trend towards commoditization, so they have looked to their offerings of different AI models as a way to differentiate. Google highlighted Gemini 2.5 and Veo (video model) alongside Llama 4 (Meta) and Claude (Anthropic). Microsoft’s relationship with OpenAI continues to be a strong point of differentiation, but over the past year, Microsoft has emphasized that the model layer will trend toward commoditization over time.
Proprietary silicon and full-stack tooling are emerging as additional points of differentiation. Google launched its inference-optimized TPU and an open source Agent Development Kit, while Amazon is scaling Trainium2 and positioning Bedrock, an AI development suite, as a best-in-class managed platform.
In short: AI is becoming the center of gravity across the tech stack. Q1 2025 earnings calls showed incumbents scrambling to embed autonomous agents, infra vendors riding a fresh cloud-modernization wave, and hyperscalers straining to meet surging compute demand while differentiating through silicon and model ecosystems. Unified customer data and scarce AI talent are emerging as the differentiators (for now!), and usage-based pricing is turning early curiosity into durable revenue. We’ll keep tracking how AI reshapes public companies, returning with fresh insights after Q2 2025.
Thanks to Justin Kahl and Ryan Allen for their contributions to the research and insights.
More from the a16z Growth Compendium
How 100 Enterprise CIOs Are Building and Buying Gen AI in 2025
By Sarah Wang , Shangda Xu , Justin Kahl , and Tugce Erten
To complement the hard numbers from earnings with a forward look at demand, we also surveyed 100 CIOs across 15 industries about how they’re building, buying, and budgeting for gen AI. The report distills 16 key shifts—from budget reallocations and frontier model differentiation to procurement processes and the rise of AI apps—that highlight where enterprise leaders still have concerns about gen AI and where they’re doubling down. A helpful complement for understanding how the public market supply we discuss above meets up with buyer demand.
Connect with a16z Growth
Want to stay informed on the latest from a16z Growth? Subscribe here to receive these LinkedIn newsletters regularly.
And if you’re interested in in-depth theses, frameworks, benchmarking, and tactics for finding and growing best-in-class businesses straight from the a16z Growth investing and operating teams, check out our new Substack here.
Disclosures
You are receiving this newsletter since you opted in earlier; if you would like to opt out of future newsletters, you can unsubscribe immediately.
This newsletter is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. This newsletter may link to other websites and certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation.
References to any companies, securities, or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by a16z. (An offering to invest in an a16z fund will be made only by the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, and other relevant documentation of any such fund which should be read in their entirety.) Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Content in this newsletter speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Please see disclosures for additional important information.
Multi-Award-Winning Product Leader | Turning Data, AI, and Systems into Scalable Impact
1moI think that it's fantastic that we are putting more AI strategy into our products, but what I've found is more impactful in the immediate timeframe is that it allows us to free up our time from grunt work tasks so that we can concentrate on building AI into products in a valuable way instead of just slapping it into the product because it's a cool buzzword.
Business Building at Tata Consultancy Services | Driving Innovation and Transformation | Trusted CxO Advisor| Customer Satisfaction
1moGreat insights. Would love to hear your perspective on the MIT report that indicated that 95% AI initiatives are failing?
LinkedIn Top Voice⭐, Global Alliances, AI Transformation, Business Modeling, Software Pricing/Packaging, and Advisory. Published author with a strong software business and ecosystem background.
2moThanks for sharing, super informative!
Accountant
2mo💡 Great insight
Co-Founder & COO | FalconHQ 🦅 | Sponsorship Intelligence, simplified.
2moWould be great to balance this with the remaining S&P 90% and understand the gaps in adoption and execution (aside from Tech and top 10)