AI's Strip Mall Problem: Are We Building Disposable Digital Futures?

AI's Strip Mall Problem: Are We Building Disposable Digital Futures?

Is it just me, or are we creating a bunch of “cheap strip malls” with AI?

Hear me out…

Ask most architects about their opinion on strip malls, and you likely hear some heavy criticism. Why? Because they aren’t built with any sense of beauty, longevity, or craft.

Unfortunately, the American landscape is littered with strip malls. Most are ugly, inefficient uses of space, and will likely be torn down within the next 50 years. We aren’t building things to last anymore, and most architecture is boring boxes devoid of any soul. Don’t believe me? Compare most modern buildings to the Art Deco era, or American buildings to European. There is a stark difference. Such is the case with many aspects of our culture, due to an unending pursuit of convenience and a willingness to view things as disposable.

If you ever want to go down this rabbit hole, there are some fantastic documentaries on this subject, but I digress. Back to AI…

As I’ve been diving into using AI, primarily from the standpoint of how do I prepare our company for scalable growth, I’m seeing very similar approaches crop up in the things people are using AI to create.

Some examples:

  • Content: Content on LinkedIn is increasingly becoming AI-generated. But are people becoming more skeptical, less inclined to read, and losing trust in its authenticity?
  • Documentation: Tools that document everything we do, from note-takers to wearables, mean we don't have to remember and miss things. But are we truly using this data for efficiency, or is it fostering lazy thinking and a diminished attention span?
  • Relationships: People are turning to AI (a.k.a. the cringe of friend.com) for friends, relationships, and mentors. But as social isolation reaches all-time highs, are we sacrificing the meaningful, innovation-driving connections that come from real human relationships?
  • Apps/Websites: All kinds of new apps and websites are being churned out like crazy thanks to low-code tech tools. But do many of these apps now lack sophistication, design, or a sense of unique craft, making them feel generic?
  • Pitch Decks: Pitch decks are assembled with little effort using AI. But part of crafting a truly compelling deck is deeply understanding your customer and the art of selling an idea; will this automation affect our ability to communicate convincingly and authentically?
  • Process Automation: Many processes are being automated, like managing email, scheduling, and even more complex tasks. But are we inadvertently losing our fundamental ability to communicate effectively with each other?

While on the surface, these tools provide value in terms of efficiency and democratize things that were once out of reach for many people. But in many cases, the output is still a cheap version of what people could be making.

This isn’t a plea to turn away from AI, but rather for us to handle it with care. We need to be careful not to give up on pursuing things that matter, such as critical thinking, creativity, meaningful connections, and becoming craftsmen. I keep hearing people talk about the promise of AI to enable these things, but it isn’t up to AI to make this happen; it’s up to each of us. We will either decide that we are okay with cheap, convenient, and disposable, or we will pursue things with beauty, longevity, and craft.

#futureofwork #connection #ai

Ryan Davis

Design Director | Future Interfaces, Creative Tech, & Systems Strategy

3mo

I'll get back to you as soon as I decide which AI-generate response to use…

  • No alternative text description for this image
Haley Ingersoll

Founder | Connection Builder

4mo

I never considered the parallel to strip malls, but I think it is a spot-on representation. More room for those who value craftsmanship and longevity, I guess? Thanks for raising this!

John Beck

Director Of Product Design at Truefit

4mo

Chris Roberts Sharing this great quote I ran across in the comments to one of 👨🏻💻 Andy Budd recent articles. Design thinker Christina Wodtke was arguing that we're suffering from a "manufactured urgency" issue as a result of our AI-mania. His response follows. I think it's very true and a shrewd insight. "Some of the urgency is real, but I’d agree that a lot is manufactured. However I’ve started framing this as a chess vs poker mindset. Chess is a game where the best players almost always win, and where it’s very concerned with not wasting resources. Designers generally have a chess mindset. Trying to play the perfect game and avoiding waste. Sadly most businesses have a poker mindset. Lots of quick hands. Aware that most of the hands will lose. But you’re hoping that you’ll randomly pull some good cards, and then double down. So it’s inherently wasteful and speed of play is important (or at the very least baked into the rules/culture of the game). This is why I want to see more design founders. That way they can choose to play chess, rather than trying to convince their bosses to play each hand like it was chess.”

Dave Hartman

QA Test Automation Engineer | Groovy, Python, AWS

4mo

With my normal wonderful, warm, compassionate demeanor, I'm afraid you're a little late to the party on this one. We as a society have been steadily emphasizing short term gains over long term growth, beauty and sustainability for decades. AI, sadly, is just another tool to increase the pace at which we produce junk. Abstractly speaking, we as a species, we are simply ambulatory, bio-chemical catalysts; agents of entropy. AI is just making us even more effective to that end. As always, love, peace and happiness! ;) Enjoy the sunshine.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Chris Roberts

  • Let's get real about innovation hurdles

    This is a brief case study for meaningful & constructive conversations about why things aren’t working within our…

    6 Comments

Others also viewed

Explore content categories