The Hidden KPI Trap Sabotaging Your Strategy
Contrarian Viewpoint: KPIs set department-wise create silos. True strategy KPIs must cut across functions to drive enterprise-wide alignment.
Why Siloed KPIs Quietly Kill Strategy
Most leaders set KPIs by department. It feels neat and manageable—but it quietly kills strategy. True strategic KPIs don’t live in silos; they cut across functions, forcing collaboration and aligning the entire organization toward the bigger goal.
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself." – Henry Ford
When organizations set KPIs in departmental silos, they unintentionally foster turf wars, duplicate efforts, and misaligned priorities. A sales team might be chasing revenue growth, operations could be focused on efficiency, and finance might be tightening cost controls—all at the same time, and often in ways that conflict. The result? Each department “wins” on its own scoreboard, but the business loses in the marketplace.
I’ve seen this play out in an Indian manufacturing company where production’s KPI was to maximize throughput, while marketing’s was to launch frequent promotions. The unintended outcome? Production ramped up stock for promotional surges that never matched actual customer demand, leading to excess inventory, tied-up capital, and warehouse congestion. Each department proudly hit its targets—but profitability tanked.
Similarly, a large Indian bank ran into trouble when its digital team was measured on app downloads, while the branch network’s KPI focused on in-branch product cross-selling. Instead of working together to create an integrated customer journey, they competed for customer attention and ended up confusing the customers.
What Cross-Functional KPIs Do Differently
True strategic KPIs don’t live in silos; they cut across functions, forcing collaboration and aligning the entire organisation toward the bigger goal. They represent the enterprise’s critical success factors and force leaders to think beyond their own domain.
For example, a KPI such as “Increase customer lifetime value” requires collaboration between marketing, sales, operations, and service. Each function must contribute, and success depends on their integration, not their independence.
Infosys provides a good case study here. When they shifted one of their core KPIs from “billable hours” (a delivery-focused metric) to “client value creation” (a broad, relationship-driven outcome), it required sales, delivery, HR, and technology teams to align. Billable hours alone could be optimized by one department. Client value creation could only be achieved by seamless coordination across the whole organization.
When designed well, cross-functional KPIs:
It’s worth noting that these benefits often surface gradually. In the early months, expect discomfort and pushback. Departments used to “owning” their results may resist the idea that their success is now tied to others. In my work with a mid-sized Indian pharma company, sales initially resisted a KPI linked to “time-to-market for new products” because they felt it was “operations’ job.” Six months later, they became one of its strongest champions—because faster launches directly improved their own sales performance.
Common Pitfalls That Derail Cross-Functional KPIs
Adopting cross-functional KPIs is not without challenges. Many leaders fear losing control over their department’s agenda. Others worry about the difficulty of measuring a metric influenced by multiple teams. These tensions are natural—and a sign you are working on the right problems. Strategy is about integration, not isolation.
Two pitfalls show up repeatedly:
How to make cross-functional KPIs work in practice:
One leading Indian e-commerce player adopted “Order Fulfilment within 24 Hours” as a cross-functional KPI. Logistics, procurement, customer service, and IT all contributed to it. The logistics head acted as custodian, but each function’s contribution was tracked in detail. This balance of shared accountability and individual clarity meant that bottlenecks were spotted and resolved within days, not weeks.
For leaders looking to leap, start small. Pilot one or two cross-functional KPIs in a high-impact area, build the muscle for shared accountability, then scale.
The Mindset Shift
Traditional KPI setting is like giving each player on a football team a separate scoreboard. Cross-functional KPI setting is like giving the team one scoreboard—and making sure everyone knows the final score matters more than any personal stat.
When your KPIs are strategically integrated, you stop optimizing parts at the expense of the whole. You start making decisions that move the entire organization forward in one direction. And that’s how you turn strategy from a PowerPoint into a performance reality.
In the end, the question isn’t “Can I control my department’s KPIs?”—it’s “Can I influence the company’s success?” Leaders who embrace cross-functional KPIs send a powerful message: that the business wins only when we win together.
Integrated Management Community past chair.
2moSilo thinking and independent action separate from the whole leads to incoherence in the overall functioning of the organisation. I would also caution against ill conceived and constructed KPIs as a management instrument as opposed to a holistic stakeholder perspective. KPI change should initiate investigation into its root causes.
Mentor & Executive Coach(ICF CERTIFIED), Engage, Enable...Empower, Former MD - Galderma India, Mentor to CEOs across a few sectors Certified NLP practitioner.
2moGopal Sharma Very relevant. Intention genuine but action and outcome contrary to the purpose As you rightly said… True strategic KPIs are not just departmental scorecards. They work as enterprise glue — connecting sales, marketing, finance, operations, HR, and beyond. Instead of measuring in silos (e.g., sales revenue vs. HR retention), they focus on critical success factors that require everyone to contribute.
--
2moA few comments. 1. Meeting all KPIs does not mean that the strategy goal will be achieved. KPIs reflect only individual aspects of functioning and development that can be quantitatively recorded. But the goal is always a systemic characteristic - it is associated with the emergent properties of the system, and no list of metrics can fully cover this integrity. KPIs are only an approximation, a "lightbulb" at specific points, but not the whole road. 2. Functional KPIs, like the functional units themselves, are not connected with strategy at all. Rumelt said this: "for most managers, "strategy" has become a parasitic word. In business jargon, marketing is called "marketing strategy", information processing is called "IT strategy", mergers and acquisitions are called "growth strategy". If you simply reduce prices, then you are implementing a "low price strategy". When "strategy" is understood as success, the ability to take risks, bold plans, it completely confuses everyone." At this level, only tactical tasks are possible.