Neuroplasticity in AI – A Brainy Tale of Growth and Pruning

Hello, dear readers! Welcome back to another edition of Gen AI Simplified, the newsletter where we break down the latest developments in Artificial Intelligence into everyday language.

Today’s topic might sound like something a neuroscientist daydreamed up, but it’s taking AI research by storm: Neuroplasticity in AI. If you think that sounds like science fiction, you’re partly right. “Neuro- what?” you may ask. Fear not; as the late, great Douglas Adams told us in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: “Don’t Panic.” We’re here to explore how AI can adopt ideas from our brains’ remarkable ability to rewire and adapt itself—sometimes known as brain plasticity—and what that means for next-gen large language models (LLMs).

So, strap in. Or as Obi-Wan Kenobi might say: “You’ve taken your first step into a larger world.

The Brain: Nature’s Ultimate Hacker

When we think “plasticity,” we often imagine something flexible—like that tacky plastic wrap that refuses to come off your sandwich. But in neuroscience, neuroplasticity goes way beyond cling film. It’s the brain’s incredible power to reorganize its cells in response to experiences—forming new neurons (birth!), pruning unused connections, or shifting them around. This is how humans keep learning, even when we’re old enough to grumble about “kids these days.”

• Neurogenesis: Your noggin can sprout entirely new neurons, especially in regions like the hippocampus (related to memory).
• Neuroapoptosis: Cells also die off or get “pruned” if they’re not pulling their weight or if they’re messing up the synergy.

This idea that the brain is not a fixed organ but a dynamic one is the stuff of cutting-edge neuroscience. It’s also fantastic inspiration for AI. After all, humans don’t keep the same exact number of neurons for life—so why should an AI model be forced to keep the same number of artificial “neurons” or “weights”?

Enter AI: Fixed Architectures vs. A More Brain-like Approach

In typical AI systems—especially large language models (LLMs) like GPT and Llama—the architecture is pretty much set in stone once training is done. You have this massive set of parameters (billions of them in some cases), and you can tweak them during training, but you usually don’t add or remove entire “neurons” midstream. It’s as if you got your final Lego kit arrangement and said, “That’s it, can’t add or remove a single piece ever again.” A bit limiting, right?

Neuroplasticity-inspired AI says: But what if we could add or remove pieces?

Imagine if your phone’s autocorrect could literally “grow new neurons” the moment you keep using a brand-new slang word. Or if it could chop off parts of its language model that never get used (so you don’t get stuck with bizarre auto-suggestions from 1995). That’s the guiding vision behind research on neural network plasticity—an AI that can reorganize, expand, or prune parts of itself throughout its life.

The Road So Far: Growing, Pruning, and Everything in Between

Historically, the idea of letting networks grow or shrink isn’t completely new:

• Growing Neural Networks: Back in 1990, the Cascade-Correlation algorithm introduced the notion of adding new hidden neurons during training. A blast from the past, but definitely relevant.
• Pruning: Also in 1990, research on Optimal Brain Damage (lovely name) showed how you could remove unnecessary weights in neural networks without losing much performance. Think of it like spring cleaning—but for neurons.

Fast forward a few decades, and we see these ideas popping up in different forms: from dropout (temporarily deactivating neurons during training to reduce overfitting) to more permanent structural pruning (like tossing out a pair of shoes you never wear).

All these methods revolve around one half of the puzzle—either adding or removing. But as the brain elegantly demonstrates, real neuroplasticity is a combination of both: birth and death, “drop in” and “drop out.”

From Dropout to “Dropin”: Yes, You Read That Right

One of the coolest developments in the field is the concept of “dropin”—the comedic sidekick to dropout. While dropout randomly removes neurons to encourage robustness, dropin randomly adds new neurons to increase the network’s capacity when needed. It’s the AI version of: “I sense you need more help here—let’s bring in some fresh neurons.”

In a 2025 paper titled “Neuroplasticity in Artificial Intelligence – An Overview and Inspirations on Drop In & Out Learning,” researchers basically said, “Why settle for removing neurons alone? Let’s let the network sprout new ones too!”

• Dropout as Apoptosis: Familiar territory. We shut off or prune unhelpful bits.
• Dropin as Neurogenesis: Less standard in AI, but extremely powerful. Add capacity on-the-fly to handle new knowledge or tasks.

Result: A dynamic, self-modifying AI that can handle an ever-changing environment. “I think, therefore I expand,” as a philosophically minded AI might say if it were channeling Descartes.

Why Should You Care? The Big Picture for LLMs

Large Language Models have shown us they can be unbelievably good at generating text, translating languages, summarizing emails, and occasionally recommending questionable pizza toppings. But once these behemoths are trained, any new knowledge typically requires either a full retraining or a specialized “fine-tuning” hack. And as we know, training them from scratch is about as cheap as a round trip to Mars. (Who wouldn’t want to quote The Martian here: “I’m going to have to science the [heck] out of this.”)

Imagine a scenario where your favorite LLM, say GPT-∞ (a hypothetical future version), is happily living in your device, consistently “dropping in” new neurons whenever it encounters a subject it truly doesn’t know. Or it might prune away some underutilized nodes that handle, say, “rare 14th-century romance poetry” if you’re more of a “modern office memo” type. This model would not only be more tailored to you but also more resource-efficient—and less prone to catastrophic forgetting (where a model overwrites old knowledge whenever it learns something new).

Key benefits:

1. Continual Learning: Your AI sidekick grows with you, no big reboots needed.
2. Efficiency: It prunes away the unnecessary stuff—like clearing your closet of that disco outfit you promised you’d wear “someday.”
3. Robustness: If certain neurons “fail” or corrupt, the system can rewire or regrow new ones, akin to the brain’s recovery post-injury.

The Challenges: “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility”

As Uncle Ben from Spider-Man might caution, all this newfound power to shape-shift an AI’s architecture comes with its own set of responsibilities and complexities:

1. When to Grow/Prune: If we add too many neurons too often, we get a ballooning model that’s slower than a snail on a lazy Sunday. If we prune too often, we risk losing essential knowledge. Striking that balance is an active area of research.
2. Implementation Complexity: Traditional neural network toolkits assume a fixed architecture. Making them “plastic” requires new ways to initialize added neurons or to carefully remove pruned neurons so the model doesn’t blow up.
3. The Debugging Conundrum: When the network’s structure changes mid-training, how do we interpret layers, log data, or figure out which part of the network is responsible for which decision? It’s like chasing a moving target.

But on the flip side, the payoff is huge: imagine an AI that never truly hits a learning cap, that reorganizes itself over years—an AI with the adaptability reminiscent of a real brain. That’s practically the dream scenario for advancing our digital co-pilots into the next era.

Neuroplasiticity vs RAG vs Long Context Models

Neuroplasticity research tries to solve the problem of how to embed and reorganize knowledge within the model itself over time, whereas RAG offloads knowledge to an external source, and long-context LLMs primarily focus on handling bigger real-time inputs. They’re all addressing different dimensions of ‘adaptation’ or ‘access to more information,’ but do so using complementary strategies.

Future: A Galaxy of Adaptive Models

So where do we go from here? As Star Trek would proclaim: “Space… the final frontier.” Except, in our context, the final frontier is a new realm of AI that’s not restricted to the one-and-done architecture that we currently rely on.

1. Lifelong Learning: We’re marching towards AI that can keep updating and refining as new data arrives. They’ll do it without forgetting older tasks (the dreaded catastrophic forgetting problem).
2. Efficiency Gains: Models will be able to expand or contract based on user needs or hardware constraints. Maybe your phone’s personal assistant “condenses” itself to run on limited memory while you’re traveling in remote corners of the world
3. Neuromorphic Hardware: At some point, specialized chips (inspired by the brain) might better support on-chip learning with dynamic, plastic connections. This synergy could help realize the vision of a physically rewiring neural net.
4. Ethical & Safety Questions: A constantly evolving AI raises new issues. Is it still the same AI we started with, or effectively a “new” entity with each major rewrite? If your AI sidekick spontaneously adds new neurons, how do we ensure it doesn’t pick up biases or unexpected behaviors?

These are the pressing questions. But hey, if we learned one thing from The Terminator, it’s that we should keep a close eye on how our advanced machines “learn” new tricks! Let’s just hope we don’t accidentally teach them how to morph into unstoppable T-1000 shapeshifters

Conclusion: The Quest for a Brainier AI

In closing, the push for Neuroplasticity in AI is about bridging the gap between the incredible adaptability of the human brain and the raw computational power of deep learning. The new breed of dynamic, ever-evolving neural networks might:

• Save us from repeated, costly retraining.
• Empower AI systems to learn continuously.
• Break down the barrier between “training time” and “inference time,” letting them adapt in real-time.

As the 2025 paper by Li et al. put it, combining “dropin” (the addition side) with existing “dropout” (the removal side) can give networks the best of both worlds—kind of like a buddy-cop movie, where one partner is all about tough love (pruning) and the other is about creativity and expansion.

Before I let you go (or, in newsletter terms, before you scroll on to the next cat meme), I want to remind you: the future is about synergy—between biology and AI, between growth and pruning, and between powerful technology and wise usage. As Dr. Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park famously stated: “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” Let’s aim to be mindful as we build these new, flexible AI brains.

If you found this exploration of “Neuroplasticity in AI” enlightening (or at least mildly entertaining), do me a favor and:

1. Like this newsletter (because who doesn’t like a little validation?).
2. Share it with your fellow AI enthusiasts, your weird cousin who loves sci-fi references, or any curious soul.
3. Subscribe for more episodes of Gen AI Simplified, where we talk about all things neural nets, data wrangling, and the creative intersection of machine and mind.

Because let’s face it, you’re not just a passive observer here; you’re part of the AI revolution—one that’s about to grow and prune itself in ways we never thought possible.

— That’s all for this edition—though hopefully not the end of your curiosity!

View the video version of this newsletter on Retured's YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/DDytDGsBf8A

🚀 About  Retured

AI × Neuroscience for sharper thinking

Our patent‑pending engine personalises any digital content—LMS lessons, university courses, news feeds, dashboards, you name it—so it matches an individual's cognitive profile. Companion AI tools automate routine decisions, lighten mental load, predict risks, and surface insights that matter. Retured turns specialised knowledge into production‑ready AI solutions, closing the skills gap most employees still face through expert mentorship, project‑based learning, and use‑case‑focused training.