The Rise of Agentic Process Automation: Are Vendors Ready?

The Rise of Agentic Process Automation: Are Vendors Ready?

The enterprise automation practices started with Robotic Process Automation (RPA), promising speed, efficiency, and cost reduction. For many organizations it delivered immediate value by eliminating repetitive tasks. The next stage, Intelligent Automation, came with AI, Optical Character Recognition, and low-code platforms to enable more sophisticated workflows and decision-making structures. However, we are now facing a much more transformative evolution. Agentic Process Automation comes with new operational models where autonomous AI agents do not simply carry out instructions to orchestrate, optimize, and adapt business processes in near real time. This paradigm goes far beyond just improving the ability for automation; it fundamentally challenges the notion of how work should be conceptualized, executed, and scaled by digital enterprises.

Yet, the elemental question remains: Are current technology vendors truly prepared to support this leap?

From Task Execution to Outcome Autonomy

Agentic automation moves beyond task-level automation and static process flows. It aims to empower software agents with the ability to sense operational context, interpret data signals, interact with systems and people, and make decisions aligned with business goals. These agents are expected to learn continuously from feedback, evolve their behaviour over time, and coordinate across a dynamic digital ecosystem. The intent is not just to automate more but to introduce adaptive autonomy at the core of enterprise operations. However, this shift introduces inherent complexity, as most legacy RPA platforms still design around rigid, rule-based task logic. They rely on organized data, centralized control, and a narrow understanding of context, which clash with the flexible and responsive characteristics of agentic models.

Are Today’s Vendors Structurally Aligned?

Traditional RPA vendors have made incremental enhancements to their platforms. Some have embedded basic AI services, launched low-code development capabilities, and introduced decisioning features. However, these additions are often superficial and are merely add-ons. Very few have re-engineered their architecture to support autonomous, context-aware agent behaviour.

Business Process Management suites, especially those that manage end-to-end process orchestration, are theoretically better positioned to enable agentic automation. Their process lifecycle frameworks and enterprise-grade integration capabilities provide a foundation for orchestrating distributed actors. Nonetheless, most BPM platforms still require heavy human-led configuration and do not yet demonstrate the embedded AI autonomy necessary to enable agents that can learn and evolve independently.

In contrast, a new wave of emerging vendors, often grounded in AI-native design principles, is beginning to explore this space seriously. These platforms incorporate large language models, contextual memory, and event-driven architectures, allowing agents to operate with greater independence and situational awareness. While their commercial footprint is still limited, their architectural vision points to where the market is inevitably headed.

 Assessing Market Readiness: What to Watch For

Enterprise leaders evaluating agentic readiness should look beyond marketing claims and probe platform fundamentals. Telltale signs of immaturity include reliance on hardcoded workflows, lack of feedback loops, absence of goal-oriented execution frameworks, and limited transparency into AI behaviour. These indicate that the system is merely simulating autonomy, not genuinely enabling it. On the other hand, readiness is shown in platforms that use event-driven architectures, keep track of agent memory and context, allow for modular agent deployment, and have built-in features for continuous learning and self-improvement. Such features are not merely technical advantages, they are prerequisites for building systems that can adapt and act without constant human input.

Strategic Questions for Enterprise Buyers

As agentic automation becomes a strategic priority, enterprise stakeholders must challenge their vendors and internal teams with critical questions.

  • Can the automation platform handle autonomous decision cycles end-to-end?
  • Does it include governance and explainability frameworks to ensure AI actions remain transparent and controllable?
  • Is the architecture designed for continuous process evolution, or does it rely on fixed logic?
  • And most importantly, how is human oversight structured in this increasingly autonomous ecosystem?

Final Thought

Agentic Process Automation is not a futuristic concept. It is an emerging reality that reflects the next stage of maturity in enterprise automation. The shift from rule-based automation to intelligent orchestration represents a decisive break from the past. It enables enterprises to operate not just with greater speed but with strategic agility. The real differentiator will not be how many bots a vendor can deploy, but how intelligently, autonomously, and adaptively those bots or agents can operate within an enterprise context. The market is currently at a pivotal juncture. Some vendors are reengineering toward this new paradigm. Others are simply retrofitting old architectures with AI labels. The time for evaluation is now.

Are your vendors truly architected for the future, or are they holding your enterprise back with automation models rooted in the past?

 

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Pranjal Singh

Others also viewed

Explore content categories