Three Questions for Transformation
Transformation doesn't have to come from outside your company. Picture this: a simple framework that not only acts as a catalyst for profound change but also enhances your leadership prowess. Intrigued? Let's explore the transformative realm of retrospective meetings and unveil the secret to continuous improvement.
Retrospective meetings exist in many forms including “lessons learned” meetings, agile retrospectives, project post-mortems, after-action reviews, debriefs, and pre-mortems. You may also be familiar with its cousin, “shame and dishonor,” where people shift blame and assign disgrace; that meeting is far less helpful, but widely practiced sadly.
As much as retrospectives can be painful, I have a confession: I love them. You should, too. Here’s why:
Transformation is a powerful act for any business. Whether the transformation is digital, business, operational, or process, it marks a powerful opportunity to drive meaningful improvement. A retrospective offers a team and a company a chance to do that without bringing in a team of expensive consultants. It brings together fresh observations from the people who know the business as well as anyone. Think of a retrospective as a chance to do a “mini” transformation.
Retrospectives are fueled by data (when they are actually done – and they often are skipped in my experience). Beyond project data, the most common tool I’ve seen for input is a survey. Post-project surveys serve as invaluable tools for gathering qualitative feedback, insights, and lessons learned. Leaders often try to make this data quantitative by assigning scales such as A - F, 0 - 10, 1 - 5, Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Surveys have practical outcomes including accountability, transparency, communication, opportunities for improvement, and more.
Also, surveys are typically terrible.
It’s not your fault! Crafting an effective survey is exceptionally challenging. It’s difficult to select a scale that works. Normalizing responses is a pain. Writing questions that avoid bias in wording is an art form. People design surveys for a living, and there’s a good reason why. It’s hard.
In my experience, simplicity is key to a good survey. To drive periodic and meaningful transformation through the retrospective, you need a streamlined approach. Here is one example I have successfully used, focusing on just three questions that yield profound insights and foster meaningful improvements. Each question is tied directly to an outcome.
Here’s what I focus on:
1. Improve Your Team
We want a survey that will have an immediate impact on the current team (or individual contributors who will join new teams). Gathering feedback to improve current processes, address challenges, and celebrate successes directly contributes to the team's growth, collaboration, and efficiency. Your job is to be responsive to members' experiences and adapt quickly to optimize performance.
Here’s the question I use:
"What specific challenges and/or successes most stood out to you on this project, and how can we leverage your insight for future projects?"
Here’s why I like it:
2. Help Future Teams Doing Similar Work:
We want a question that provides insight for future teams. Think of this as a message in a bottle. I’ve often belonged to teams where people recall that “person X did something like this 3 years ago” or “team Y worked with that vendor last year”. Your success in future efforts should not be predicated on detective work. Be the person X and team Y you wish you had. It promotes knowledge sharing, prevents the repetition of mistakes, and accelerates the learning curve for subsequent teams. It also recognizes the interconnectedness of projects and teams over time.
Here’s the question I use:
"Reflecting on our experience, what advice would you give to future teams working on similar projects, and what do you wish you had known?"
Why it Works:
3. Provide Insight to the Larger Org or Company:
Insights gained from individual projects can inform strategic decisions, influence company-wide practices, and contribute to a more informed, agile, and adaptive organization. Retrospectives are among the most powerful opportunities to influence transformation for a company. The insights gained are curated and equitable insights from teams for continuous improvement.
Here’s the question I use:
"What impact do you believe this project had on our stakeholders and clients, and what insights should we share for future initiatives?"
Why it’s a great question:
Conclusion
A retrospective is a powerful moment for intentional reflection and presents an opportunity for improvement of team performance, to reduce risk for future project teams, and to drive transformation for the organization.
The three fundamental questions presented here provide an architectural framework for fostering transformation. Simplicity, often overlooked in the complexity of survey design, becomes the cornerstone for meaningful leadership insights. The journey toward improvement may not be glamorous, but it is undeniably necessary!
Embrace the power of collective intelligence and ask these three questions before your next retrospective. Use the insights gained to find common themes, outliers, and diverse voices in your organization. Embrace the mini transformation!
#Leadership #AgileLeadership #ContinuousImprovement #BusinessTransformation #DigitalTransformation #Innovation #ProjectManagement #ProductManagement
Talent Development | Leadership Development | Sales Enablement | Organizational Development | Change Management | Former Global Capability & Learning Lead
1yGreat article Matthew Douglass! Running retrospectives with my team has been invaluable in pinpointing areas for improvement and addressing gaps in our processes. This is a great read for those aspiring to be transformational leaders, providing practical guidance on how retrospectives can drive meaningful change. 👏
Matthew Douglass- Great insights, Retro to harness power of collective intelligence, importantly it is part of ongoing improvement. Indeed familiar with the cousin" Shame and dishonor". What has been your experience , how often should the retro be done to make it more effective ?
Senior Managing Director
1yMatthew Douglass Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.