Valuation 101 for Pre-Seed Cybersecurity Startups

Valuation 101 for Pre-Seed Cybersecurity Startups

How to make sense of sky-high expectations in a market built on invisible threats

Let’s be honest: Pre-seed valuations are more art than science

If you're looking for perfect spreadsheets or clean comps at pre-seed—especially in cyber—you're looking in the wrong place. This is the domain of imperfect signals, asymmetric bets, and founders selling a vision rather than a product.

But that doesn’t mean you have to fly blind.

Why Cyber is Different (and Hotter Than Ever)

Cybersecurity is a $300+ market growing double digits YoY. What makes pre-seed in cyber unique?

  • High technical moat: Often led by technical founders with deep specialization.
  • Shorter path to validation: MVPs can be tested via paid pilots with CISOs.
  • Massive acquirer appetite: Incumbents like Palo Alto, Cisco, and CrowdStrike are constantly buying.
  • Macro tailwinds: AI = more data = bigger attack surface.

Translation: it’s easier to bet early if you know what to look for.

So… What’s a Fair Pre-Seed Valuation in Cyber?

Here’s the hard truth: there’s no “fair.” There’s only “what the market is willing to pay.”

But here are benchmarks from recent US and LATAM deals (2024):

Article content
LATAM tends to price 20–30% below US unless the team is global-first and exits are already modeled.

How to Value a Pre-Seed Cyber Startup

Forget DCFs. At this stage, investors price risk, not cash flow.

Instead, ask:

  • Is the founding team world-class? Look for: ex-hackers with OffSec certs, ex-military talent, repeat founders.
  • Is the wedge clear? What specific problem do they solve better than anyone? Think "phishing-resistant email for DevOps" not "AI for security."
  • Is there signal from the market? Even 2–3 CISOs giving verbal interest or an LOI is huge.
  • Does the tech actually work? A working POC > any deck with buzzwords.

Most pre-seed cyber deals get priced at 10–15x forward-looking ARR potential—based on customer validation, not revenue.

Berkus Method: “What’s the startup really bringing to the table?”

This method sets a dollar value (typically ~$500k) to five key elements — with an upper bound of $2–3M historically. However, in hot sectors like cybersecurity, with high exit potential, some investors apply multipliers.

Example (with $1.6M per factor cap):

  • MVP ready and integrated with Microsoft 365: ✅ +$1.6M
  • Technical team with OffSec and ex-Palo Alto engineers: ✅ +$1.6M
  • Clear go-to-market via MSSPs: ✅ +$1.6M
  • Paid pilot with 2 fintechs: ✅ +$1.6M
  • Modular product with clear roadmap: ✅ +$1.6M

→ Adjusted Valuation: $8M pre-money

Risk Factor Summation: “What could go wrong?”

Start with a base and adjust up/down across 12 key risks.

Example:

  • Base valuation: $5M
  • Team: +1 → +$500k
  • Product: +2 → +$1M
  • Market size: +1 → +$500k
  • GTM execution: +1 → +$500k
  • Regulatory alignment: +1 → +$500k

→ Final Valuation: $8M pre-money

Scorecard Method: “How does this startup stack up?”

Compare to other startups in the same stage and sector.

Example:

  • Avg valuation for pre-seed cyber in US: $6.5M Startup scores:
  • Team: 120%
  • Product: 110%
  • Market: 125%
  • GTM: 120%
  • Traction: 90%

Weighted average multiplier: ~1.23x

→ Valuation: $8M pre-money

First Chicago: “Let’s build a 3-scenario model.”

Used by more sophisticated investors (angels or micro-VCs).

Article content

Expected value: $61M Required return: 7.6x → $61M / 7.6 = $8M post-money

→ Pre-money (for $1M investment): $7M

Comparable Multiples: “What are similar startups actually worth?”

One of the simplest—and most overlooked—ways to anchor a valuation is by looking at what the market is already paying for comparable startups.

In cybersecurity, this means understanding the typical revenue multiples at each stage, especially for early-stage M&A and Series A deals.

Here’s how to apply it:

  1. Identify the Right Peer Set: Focus on startups with similar go-to-market models (e.g., MSSP channels, direct-to-enterprise), tech stack (e.g., endpoint, identity, cloud security), and geography.
  2. Use Forward Revenue Multiples: Most cyber M&A deals price at 8–12x forward ARR. If the startup is projecting $1M in ARR within 12–18 months, and peers are being acquired at 10x, that implies a $10M valuation floor for strategic buyers.
  3. Adjust for Stage and Signal: Pre-seed startups won't have full ARR, but if they show strong validation (e.g., paid pilots or LOIs from CISOs), investors often apply a discount to these multiples (e.g., 50–70% of the full value) to price risk and time-to-execution.

For example:

  • Projected ARR in 12–18 months: $800k
  • Peer multiple: 10x
  • Adjusted for stage and signal (65%) → → Implied pre-money valuation: $5.2M

4. Cross-check with public comps: Public cybersecurity companies still trade at ~10x EV/Revenue. For high-growth private startups, early investors often accept higher risk for a similar or better multiple down the road.

Why it matters: This method is grounded in actual market behavior, not theoretical models. It’s especially powerful when:

  • You’re investing in a hot subsegment (e.g., identity, LLM security)
  • There are recent acquisitions in that niche (check PitchBook, CB Insights, Momentum Cyber reports)
  • You want to reverse-engineer a likely acquirer’s price ceiling

VC Method Example

A Series A investor targets 20% ownership, planning for a $200 million exit in 5 years, and seeking a 30% IRR.

1. Projected Exit Value

Assume an acquisition at $200 million five years out—anchored in observed cyber deal ranges

2. Discount to Present Value

To calculate the startup’s value today, we work backward from the projected $200 million exit using the investor's desired return.

The investor expects a 30% annual return, compounded over 5 years. To find the present value (i.e., what the company would need to be worth today to justify that return), we divide the future exit value by the growth factor over those 5 years.

That growth factor is calculated by compounding 30% annually: 1.30 × 1.30 × 1.30 × 1.30 × 1.30 = approximately 3.71

Then, we divide the $200 million exit value by this growth factor:

$200 million ÷ 3.71 = approximately $53.9 million

This means the investor would only be willing to value the company at $53.9 million post-money today to hit their 30% IRR target, assuming the company exits for $200 million in 5 years.

3. Investment and Implied Valuation

  • Post-Money Valuation: ~$50 M (rounded to market)
  • Check Size: 20% × $50 M = $10 M
  • Pre-Money Valuation: $50 M − $10 M = $40 M

4. Upside Context

  • Public cyber firms still trade at ~10× EV/Revenue on average, underscoring strong exit multiples
  • Landmark exits—like Google’s $32 billion acquisition of Wiz—highlight massive strategic upside

Key Takeaways

  • Series A valuations today average $45–$50 M; this example lines up with those comps.
  • $200 M exit is conservative for top performers, given median exits and middle-market deal sizes.
  • A $10 M check for 20% at $40 M pre-money delivers ~30% IRR if a $200 M sale materializes in 5 years.
  • Grounding valuations in exit scenarios keeps founder and investor expectations aligned—and reflects the real dynamics of cyber M&A and public multiples

SAFE – When You Can’t Agree on Valuation

When it’s too early to define a fair market value — common at pre-seed — SAFEs (Simple Agreements for Future Equity) bring speed and simplicity.

Why Use a SAFE in Cyber Pre-Seed:

  • You avoid negotiating valuation too early.
  • Founders stay focused on building.
  • Investors still get upside through:

What’s the Floor Clause?

The floor is a minimum valuation at which the SAFE converts — protecting the startup if the next round is unexpectedly low.

Example:

  • SAFE: $500K investment
  • Cap: $8M
  • Discount: 20%
  • Floor: $5M

Next round happens at $4M (down round). Without a floor, the SAFE converts at $3.2M (4M x 80%). With the floor, it converts at $5M — avoiding excessive dilution in tough markets.

This hybrid setup balances upside for investors and survival for founders — especially relevant in volatile or highly regulated sectors like cybersecurity.

Strategic vs Financial Logic

In cyber, acquirers rarely wait for profitability. They buy:

  • Talent
  • Tech
  • Time-to-market advantage

That’s why your pre-seed bet isn’t on revenue—it's on velocity to strategic relevance.

Red Flags That Kill Valuations

Avoid these profiles like malware:

  • Solo CISOs trying to become CEOs — Often lack product or GTM chops.
  • Hackers with no customer empathy — Can’t build what the market needs.
  • Buzzword overload — AI, Zero Trust, Blockchain... all in one? Run.

Pro Tips for Investors

  • Back founder-market fit > idea fit. Ideas evolve. Talent doesn’t.
  • Use scenario modeling instead of fixed pricing. Set SAFEs with valuation caps + MFN clauses to derisk.
  • Anchor your entry price around strategic exits. Ask: “Who would buy this, why, and for how much?”
  • Build a portfolio, not a fantasy. 1 or 2 out of 10 might hit. Price accordingly.

Closing Thought

Early-stage investing in cyber is like buying fire insurance in a drought. Everyone ignores it—until the fire starts.

If you're early and right, you don’t just get returns. You get front-row seats to the next billion-dollar infosec exit.

Enjoyed the insights?

If you're looking for more perspectives on the cybersecurity market or need support with investments and pitch strategies, follow me to stay updated with the latest articles. Feel free to share this post with others who can benefit from this knowledge. For investment opportunities or strategic advice, reach out—let's connect!

Farid Singh

VP Product | INSEAD | VC 37 Investments, 50+ deals | Innovation | Defence Dual Use Cybersecurity | Deeptech Startups | 🚀 Bringing Technology, Business and Creativity together | Edge, Private Networks & 5G |

6mo

I think one metric/skill critical to early stage cybersecurity startup success is the ability to sell. Cybersec inherently is a trust business, and with a startup that is very difficult to establish. So I normally look for the ability and track record to sell, in different countries/markets and outside the friends and family circle. There are some short cuts and ways to hack these first few sales, and generally founders figure them out after wasting years trying to sell to customers. With 40+ investments in Early Stage Cybersecurity and Defence AI, I am glad you highlighted some good tips and insights here.

Gerard Cervelló

CEO & Co-Founder @ Secrets Vault | Cybersecurity, Cryptography, Blockchain

6mo

Very interesting article, that regretfully hardly applies to Europe, or at least South Europe... Based on my experience, many VCs want to get into cybersecurity, but lack knowledge and apply their standard methodology (one size fits all). And others that are "focused" on cyber tend to apply revenue metrics, etc. even in very early stages... I hope that with the revival of defense needs in Europe, more financing will be available for local cybersec startups, so we can compete in similar terms with USA and Israel startups. Happy to hear other opinions :)

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Junior Santos

Others also viewed

Explore content categories