From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data |
Date: | 2025-06-11 15:53:15 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Nathan Bossart
> IMO we should try to make the terminology consistent everywhere. I'd
> suggest putting the renaming stuff in separate prerequisite patches for
> your new CHECKPOINT option.
Ack, done in v4.
I haven't implemented a WAIT option yet since I didn't want to decide
that without more votes in either direction.
Christoph
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Rename-checkpoint-options-immediate-and-flush-all.patch | text/x-diff | 17.7 KB |
v4-0002-Add-mode-and-flush_unlogged-options-to-CHECKPOINT.patch | text/x-diff | 10.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-06-11 16:07:59 | Re: [19] Proposal: function markers to indicate collation/ctype sensitivity |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-06-11 15:22:53 | Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE |