0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

(A All XL1: All: Beam-Column Example 3 Sheet3of3 Rev

This document provides a worked example of analyzing the lateral torsional buckling resistance, minor axis bending resistance, and combined axial load plus bending resistance of a rolled I-section beam-column. It determines the buckling reduction factor to be 0.81 based on the section dimensions and material properties. It then calculates the lateral torsional buckling resistance as 22.7 kNm, the minor axis bending resistance as 128 kNm, and verifies the combined load is less than 1.0 by calculating a value of 0.88, confirming the section is adequate.

Uploaded by

lyhalim
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

(A All XL1: All: Beam-Column Example 3 Sheet3of3 Rev

This document provides a worked example of analyzing the lateral torsional buckling resistance, minor axis bending resistance, and combined axial load plus bending resistance of a rolled I-section beam-column. It determines the buckling reduction factor to be 0.81 based on the section dimensions and material properties. It then calculates the lateral torsional buckling resistance as 22.7 kNm, the minor axis bending resistance as 128 kNm, and verifies the combined load is less than 1.0 by calculating a value of 0.88, confirming the section is adequate.

Uploaded by

lyhalim
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Worked example

Beam-column example 3

599

Sheet3of3

I Rev

For the case of rolled and equivalent welded sections, for I-sectionswith h / h 52.0, use buckling curve 'b' ( a = 0.34). For rolled sections, , 0 = 0.75 and All = 0.4. Buckling reduction factor XL1:
OL1= 0.5[1+all
= 0 4I

U K N A to BS EN 1993-1-1

(xll-Ill,,) + ,0&

+ 0.34(0.80- 0.4) + (0.75 x 0.802)]= 0.81


1 1 0.81+ 40.812- 0.75 x 0.802

BS EN 1993-1-1 Cl 6.3.2.3
= 0.82

XrT

OL1+

= /,=

Lateral torsional buckling resistance:


Mb nil = X r T

f, 2 75 w, = 0.82 X 992 X l o i -X 10 YWl 1.0


: . OK

= 22.7 k N m > 9.4 kNm = M , bd

BS EN 1993-1-1 Cl 6.3.2.1

Minor axis bending resistance


M<,?,Kd

w~Jizfu ~

465
1.0

275 x 10-O = 128 k N m > 2.3 kNm = Mi,bd: . OK

YM 0

BS EN I 99.3- I - I (26.2.5 (2)

Combined axial loud plus bending


For a column in simple construction, the ,following simplified interaction check may be performed:

= 0.81 +0.04+0.0.3 = 0.88 I 1.0 :.OK

:.Adopt 254 x 254 x 73 UKC Note how the ,first term (axial load) dominates for this arrangement, illustrating why great precision is not required with the two bending terms and justifying the use of conservative interaction factors.

You might also like