Individual Differences
Individual Differences
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
3
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
It is often said that no two individuals are exact duplicates; they differ from each other in some way or the other. Hence the job of the psychologist is to identify and understand this uniqueness in individuals. Such a similarity or difference between persons reveals individual differences. It happens in our day-to-day life when we see people around us. A question comes to mind; how and why people appear similar or different to each other? For example when we think about their physical appearance, we often ask ourselves why some people have dark or fair complexion, why some people are tall and some are short, why some are thin and why some are very fat. When we think about their psychological characteristics we often come across people who are very talkative or less talkative, some laugh too much whereas others take much time even to smile, some are very friendly whereas some prefer to be alone. The present lesson tries to answer all such queries which can bother us in our everyday life. In psychology, these are called individual differences referring to the extent and kind of variations or similarities among people on some of the important psychological aspects such as intelligence, personality, interest, and aptitude. This lesson will also help us understand how to assess such similarities or variations among individuals.
OBJECTIVES
After studying this lesson, you will be able to: describe the nature of individual differences; understand how to assess individual differences; discuss the nature and definition of intelligence and tools to measure it; explain the nature and definition of aptitude and tools to measure it; explain interest and tools to measure interest; and discuss the nature of personality and describe the different techniques used in personality assessment.
20
Individual Differences
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
Fig. 3.1 Distribution of height of a large sample of persons The fact that people are different from each other is a very common observation. The differences in psychological characteristics are often consistent and form a stable pattern. By consistent, we mean that people tend to show regularity in their behaviour and their patterns of behaviour do not change very frequently. This consistency and stability in behaviour is unique to every person. People develop their unique traits/ characteristics and patterns of behaviour due to their genetic make up and the environment in which they are brought up. Once we know these differences systematically we can utilize the capabilities of people efficiently for their healthy development. Knowing about the specific characteristics of a person is necessary in order to extend support and utilize his or her potential to optimal level. Individual differences occur due to interaction of genetic and environmental factors. We inherit certain characteristics from our parents through genetic codes. The phenotype or the expressed forms of our characteristics depend on contributions of the socio-cultural environment. This is the reason why we are not exactly like our parents and our parents not exactly like our grandparents. We do share similarities with our parents in respect of many physical attributes like height, colour of eyes, shape of nose etc. We also inherit certain cognitive, emotional and other characteristics from our parents like intellectual competence, love for sport, creativity etc. However, our own characteristics develop largely by the support from the environment which we inhabit. The environment is responsible as how we are reared, the kind of atmosphere at house, whether it is liberal or strict, the type of education that we get, what we learn from people, around us, books, cultural practices, peers, teachers and media All these aspects refer to environment which help in developing our potentials.
PSYCHOLOGY SECONDARY COURSE
21
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Individual Differences Psychology Secondary Course Environment, by providing models and other opportunities, helps us develop many traits and skills. Our inheritance alone cannot decide what we become but our environment also contributes. We know the example of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, who was born in a very poor family but, with the right education and environment, became a great lawyer and also designed the Constitution of India. The latest and most well known example would be of our former President Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. You can also remember many such examples, who did not become great because of inheritance but because of the environment. Now you know that our genetic codes vary. At the same time, surrounding environment also differs from person to person. It sets limits or defines a range by offering different opportunities. That is why the pattern of development of each of us is different from others. It makes us think why we are similar in certain ways and different in others.
Notes
Individual Differences Finally, in order to be useful, an assessment tool should be standardized. Standardization involves establishing the procedure of administration of a test to all persons in the same way under the same conditions. It also involves establishing group norms so that an individuals score can be compared with those of others in a defined group. It is very important because a test score is only a relative score. It does not provide an absolute value as found in physical measurement. Standardization ensures uniformity and objectivity in administration and makes the results interpretable. Psychologists have developed tests to measure different human characteristics. In schools, we use achievement tests which measure what people have learnt. Psychologists frequently use tests of ability and personality. The tests of ability tell what an individual can do when he or she is at his/her best. Ability tests measure capacity as potential rather than achievement. Tests of intelligence and aptitude come under this category. Aptitude refers to the ability to learn a particular kind of skill required in a specific situation. Personality tests measure the characteristic ways of thinking, feeling or behaving.
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
23
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
In psychology, the term intelligence has been defined in many ways. One of the earliest definitions of intelligence was given by Binet and Simon in 1905 who defined it as the ability to judge well, to understand well, and to reason well. One of the most popular definitions of intelligence was given by Wechsler who defined it as the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with the environment. Gardner defined intelligence as the ability or skill to solve problems or to fashion products which are valued within one or more cultural settings. He used the term Multiple Intelligences and advocated that there are eight types of intelligences such as Linguistic, Logical-mathematical, Spatial, Musical, Bodily-kinaesthetic, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Naturalistic. Though the first attempt to measure intelligence was made by Sir Francis Galton a more systematic approach was developed by Alfred Binet, a French Psychologist. In 1905, Binet gave the concept of Mental Age (MA) which refers to an individuals level of mental development relative to the environment in which he/she lives. The term Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was first devised by William Stern, a German psychologist, in 1912. IQ is defined as mental age divided by chronological age, and multiplied by 100: (IQ = MA/CA 100). For example if the mental of a child is 12 and his/her Chronological age is 8 then the IQ of the child would be 150. The intelligence test developed by Binet was revised subsequently and in 1916 the test was given the name of Stanford - Binet test of intelligence. One of the most popular and widely used tests of intelligence is Wechsler Scales of Intelligence. These scales have been designed for individuals of different age groups such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) for adults and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) for children between the age of 6 and 16 years. Intelligence tests are of two kinds Individual test and Group test. An individual test of intelligence can be administered to a single individual at a given time whereas a group test is administered to more than one individual at a time. On the basis of nature of items, intelligence tests are Verbal, Non-verbal, and Performance Tests. A verbal test requires understanding of written words. Hence it can be administered to literate individuals only. In non-verbal test, pictures or illustrations are used as item of the test. Performance tests are made up of certain concrete tasks. Both non-verbal and performance tests can be administered to literate and illiterate individuals.
24
Individual Differences
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
25
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Individual Differences Psychology Secondary Course The term personality has been defined in diverse ways. Allport in 1937 gave a very popular definition of personality which is still referred to by scholars. According to him personality is the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment. Psychologists have approached personality from different perspectives. Each of these perspectives explains some aspects of personality. Now let us study in brief about some of these perspectives: I) The trait perspective tries to describe personality in terms of various traits. Some times the traits are grouped into clusters. These clusters are called types. For instance introversion and extraversion are two types of personality traits. II) The psychodynamic perspective calls attention to the unconscious needs and conflicts as well as the influence of earlier stages of development on our lives. Sigmund Freud, a noted psychologist, provided the core concepts for this perspective. III) The socio-cultural perspective highlights the importance of the social and cultural environment. In view of this theory, our personality and behaviour patterns are acquired through interaction with others and adoption of social and cultural norms. IV) The humanistic perspective emphasizes the enormous potential for freedom and growth present in each one of us. It is a view which is optimistic and emphasizes-on positive aspects of life and potentialities.
Notes
26
Individual Differences A. Objective or Self-Report Measures of Personality In measures of this kind, the person is asked to report about himself/herself on a set of statements organized in the form of a questionnaire or inventory. The nature of the statement can be either closed ended or open ended. In the case of closed ended statements, rating scales or optiional answers are given whereas in the case of openended statements, the person is free to describe himself or herself. A number of tests have been developed to assess different trait domains of personality. Some of the self-report measures of personality, which are widely used to assess personality, are being discussed below. (i) Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness- Personality Inventory-Revised (NEOPI-R): This test is currently one of the most popular personality assessment tools being used across the world. This test has been developed by Costa and McCrae (1992) and is based on Five-Factor Model of Personality. The test has been developed based on longitudinal studies over 15 years. It provides scores on five major dimensions of personality. These five dimensions and facets are as follows: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. (ii) Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF): This test was originally developed by Raymond B. Cattell, Karen Cattell and Heather E. P. Cattell in 1949. Since then, the test has undergone four revisions in 1956, 1962, 1967-69, and 1988-93. Currently the fifth edition developed by Conn & Ricke (1994) is in practice. This test is popularly known as 16 PF and is used for age group of 16 and above. It yields scores on 16 primary traits such as social boldness, dominance, vigilance, emotional stability and rule consciousness.It also measures five global factors, which are Extraversion, Anxiety, Tough-Mindedness, Independence and Self-control. (iii)In India a number of self- report measures of personality have been developed. Some of these modified versions are Bell Adjustment Inventory by Mohsim and Hussain, Maslow Security-Insecurity Inventory by Singh and Jamuar, Maudsley Personality Inventory of Eysenck in Hindi by Singh and Jodhpur Multiphasic Personality Inventory by Joshi and Malik, amongst others. B. Projective or Indirect Measures of Personality Projective or indirect measures of personality are widely used personality assessment tools. Unlike the self-report measures where the individual is provided with structured test stimuli, in projective tests the individual has to respond to unstructured or ambiguous stimuli. The basic assumption behind using unstructured test stimuli in projective tests is that the individual projects his/her latent or unconscious feelings, needs, emotions, motives etc. on to the ambiguous stimulus. The responses of the individual in the form of projection reflect the nature of his/her personality.
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
27
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Individual Differences Psychology Secondary Course Some popular Projective Technique are Rorschach Ink Blot Test, Thematic Appreception Test and Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank. C. Situational or Observation Measures of Personality.
Notes
Another technique to assess personality is to observe the behaviour of the individual in purposefully designed situation. Such tests are more effective in the assessment of leadership, dominance, responsibility, extraversion-introversion etc. One of the first situational tests was developed by Hartshorne, May, and their associates (1928, 1929, 1930) for the Character Education Enquiry (CEE). This test measures traits like altruism, honesty and self-control. However, situational measures of personality came into light during World War II when the United State Office of Strategic Services (OSS) used situational tests for selection of military personnel for critical overseas assignments. One of the variants of this test is Situational Stress Test in which the individual has to react to various stressful, frustrating, or emotionally disruptive situations where his helpers are obstructive and uncooperative.
28
Individual Differences which it assesses what it intends to assess. Standardization involves establishing the procedure of administration of a test to all persons in the same way under the same conditions. Intelligence refers to multifaceted abilities of people. In psychology the term intelligence has been defined in many ways. Binet and Simon in 1905 defined it as the ability to judge well, to understand well, and to reason well. One of the most popular definitions of intelligence was given by Wechsler in 1939. He defined intelligence as the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with the environment. Gardner used the term Multiple Intelligences and advocated that there are eight types of intelligences such as Linguistic, Logical-mathematical, Spatial, Musical, Bodily-kinaesthetic, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Naturalistic. The first systematic effort to assess intelligence was made in 1905 by Alfred Binet, a French psychologist, who gave the concept of Mental Age (MA). The term Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was at first devised by William Stern, a German Psychologist, in 1912. IQ is defined as mental age divided by chronological age, and multiplied by 100. IQ= MA/CA 100. There are several Intelligence Scales developed by Wechsler such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) for adults. There are salient differences between intelligence, aptitude, and achievement. Intelligence refers to the ability of a person to do a certain thing at a given time. Aptitude refers to the potential ability of the individual to learn to perform a task. Achievement involves performance at any given point of time in a particular subject (e.g. mathematics) with which you have been made familiar. Aptitude tests are used for prediction of success in various kinds of vocations such as clerical aptitude, mechanical aptitude, musical aptitude, typing aptitude, etc. Several multiple aptitude test batteries have been developed to assess aptitude. The most widely used is Differential Aptitude Test (DAT). Personality refers to a persons unique and relatively stable behaviour patterns which remain consistent across situations and over a period of time. Allport defined personality as the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment. Psychologists have approached personality from different perspectives. These viewpoints can be grouped in to four major types: Psychodynamic perspective, Socio-cultural perspective, Humanistic perspective, and Trait perspective. Personality measures are classified into three categories: Self report measures, Projective measures, and Situational measures.
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
29
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
TERMINAL QUESTIONS
1. What do you understand by the term individual differences? Notes 2. Define Intelligence. Name any two Intelligence Tests. 3. Explain the differences between Intelligence, Aptitude and Achievement. 4. Identify the major perspectives towards the understanding of personality.
30
Individual Differences 3.6 1. Person is asked to report about himself / herself on a set of statements. 2. Individual has to respond to unstructured or ambiguous stimuli. The responses in the form of projection reflect the nature of his/her personality. 3. Behaviour of individual is observed in purposefully designed situations. Hints for Terminal Questions 1. Refer to section 3.1 2. Refer to sections 3.2 & 3.3 3. Refer to section 3.4 4. Refer to section 3.5
MODULE - I
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
31