Scribd
Upload
98 views19 pages

Control System TMA

This document contains information about a student named Ganeash A/L Shanamuganathan in class 4CTR1. It includes calculations and graphs related to control systems and topics like transfer functions, damping ratio, natural frequency, rise time, and settling time. The document also contains Routh-Hurwitz stability analysis and calculations for proportional gain.

Uploaded by

Idiots Idiotss
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
98 views19 pages

Control System TMA

This document contains information about a student named Ganeash A/L Shanamuganathan in class 4CTR1. It includes calculations and graphs related to control systems and topics like transfer functions, damping ratio, natural frequency, rise time, and settling time. The document also contains Routh-Hurwitz stability analysis and calculations for proportional gain.

Uploaded by

Idiots Idiotss
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Name : Ganeash A/L Shanamuganathan

Tma :2
Class: 4CTR1
Control Systems
Tutor : Chai Yoon Yik

1a)
The overall transfer function

+
2
=

1+

+2

= +2

1++2

+
2
=
+ 2 +
+2
=

+ 2 +

()

=
)(+ 2 +

+ 2 +

b) Damping ratio from given Overshoot (OS= 10%)



ln 100%

=

+ ln
100%
10
ln 100%

=
10
+ ln
100%
= 0.59

c) = 1.5

. .

= 1

2.09 = 1 (0.59)
= 2.589

= = (2.589)
= 6.70

2( )( ) = 2

2(2.589)(0.59) = 3.055

3.055 2 = 1.55
= )(1.055

6.70( = )1.055

= 0.157

d) Tr ( rise time)

=
=

2.09
(0.59)(2.589)
2.09

= 1.054

e) The settling time


i) 2%

1
1
=

100

2 1 (0.59)
1
=

(0.59)(2.589)
100

= 2.698
ii) 5%

1
1

=

100

5 1 (0.59)
1
=

(0.59)(2.589)
100

= 2.099

Peak time (tp) = 1.508sec

Rise time = 1.056 sec

f) Comparison of and from calculation and graph simulation

Tp (peak time ) =

2.09

= 1.503
= 1.054

Theoretical Calculation
(sec)
1.054
1.503

Simulation result (sec


1.056
1.508

2a)( Routh Hurwitz Tabulation method)

()()()()

1
10

()()

= 30
=

()()

-38

264

()()

264

()()

35
50

1
10
30
38
264

0
0

264
0
0
0
0

2 . 2
2

2B)

)3
= 29

= 2.85

=) (

2.85
= 0.35625
8

0.5

0.5(2.85) = 1.425

0.6

0.6(29) = 17.4
+ 1 +

1.425 + 1 (1.425 0.3562) +17.4


1

1.425
+ 5 + 6

1.425 + 1 (0.5075) +12.2


) + 5 + 6(

1.425 + 1 (0.5075) +12.2


) + 5 + 6(

Caption of the graph

Lab1
Q1)

input

Control device

Actuator

Process

Sensor

Block Diagram

Q2) The Amplifiers function is to amplify the voltage gain in order to raise the temperature of the
sensor accordingly .

VP

VT

Temperature Equilibrium

0
2.5
3.0
3.3
Table 1

2.52 v
2.94v
3.44v
3.74v

25
29
34
37

Q3) Calculation

1) 1 + =

2.52 = 1 +
=

()

2.52
10.1

= 0.25

( 25)

output

91
2) 2.94 = 1 +
)(
10
2.94
10.1

= 0.29

) 29 (

91
3) 3.44 = 1 +
)(
10
3.44
10.1

= 0.34

) 34 (

91
4)3.74 = 1 +
)(
10
3.74
10.1

= 0.37

) 37 (

Lab2
Q1) Calculate the proportional gain (Kp) when Rp is -:

) 100
=

) 39
=

) 22
=

=1

= 2.56

= 4.56

CAPTION OF OUR LAB EXPERIMENT CIRCUIT


Q2) As for the experiment for us it was never a successful one. This is because of the circuit
dysfunction caused by the Op-amp failure to operate . This error was cause by our negligent to connect
the -9v of the power supply to the op-amp , as the op-amp requires both the +9v and the -9v to operate
Q3) The temperature will net get closer is because of the function of the proportional controller. Which
the function is whenever the error gets bigger the control of the controller will proportionally gets
bigger . Which in the case of the lab the point is the error and the temperature will deviate from the set
point which is the error .

You might also like