This document describes an experiment on simple harmonic motion. The objective was to understand Hooke's law and how oscillating masses on springs relate to frequency and spring constant. The experiment involved collecting data on position over time for different added masses on a spring using a computer interface and sensor. The results were meant to show the relationships between force, position, frequency, and mass and allow calculations of spring constant and damping constant. However, the group struggled to determine the period from the position-time graphs which prevented them from reaching a conclusion about the mass.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages
Simple Haronic Motion
This document describes an experiment on simple harmonic motion. The objective was to understand Hooke's law and how oscillating masses on springs relate to frequency and spring constant. The experiment involved collecting data on position over time for different added masses on a spring using a computer interface and sensor. The results were meant to show the relationships between force, position, frequency, and mass and allow calculations of spring constant and damping constant. However, the group struggled to determine the period from the position-time graphs which prevented them from reaching a conclusion about the mass.
Objective: The objective of this particular lab is to
understand Hookes law and simple harmonic motion of oscillating masses on a pulley and springs. Theory: In this experiment we understand the use of Hookes law. We explored the relationship between frequency, spring constant and stable masses. Apparatus: Computer with Pasco Model 700 Interface Rotary Motion Sensor Strings Weight Hanger Spring Balance Varying Masses
Procedure:
1. Adjust the apparatus. Setup the apparatus as shown
in the figure. The 500 g weight on the right pan goes on the floor that the spring is attached to and on the other pan (that is on left) you put 40 g weight, so that the spring and the scale are vertical. 2. Take that position of the pan as the equilibrium position. 2- Start the data collection add extra mass m such as 10g, 20g, 30g and 40g to further stretch the spring. 3. For each extra mass m, allow the pan to go down very slowly to the maximum position x and stop the data collection. 4. Enlarge the positions table you can record the extra stretch x. Repeat this with the different weights.
Ezedonmwen 3
5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
Plot mg vs. x, draw a straight line through the origin
and all the points. (g is the gravity acceleration constant ). The slope of the line is the spring constant k Remove the extra masses and come back to the equilibrium position (with 40g). Displace the whole weight by a small vertical distance (an inch or two). Release the system and start the collection data at the same time. When the oscillations (vibrations) vanish, stop the data collection. On the graph of the position vs. time, use the sine fit to fit all sinusoidal plots. You can read the period of oscillations and calculate the value of the corresponding frequency Now, using the formula, calculate the real mass m1 . What is your conclusion? Use the computer pencil to draw the line that connects the top peaks of the positions waves. Use the Natural Exponent fit to fit that line. The exponent C gives you the value of / 2 . Infer the value of the damping constant . Repeat the same experiment for the extra mass of 40 more grams. Print all graphs and tables
14.
Calculations: (Attached on a separate paper)
Conclusion: For this experiment we had
tremendous difficulties. As a whole we do understand how the slope of the force versus position graph is equal to the spring constant. While attain the period from each graph we should be able to find the frequency. Unfortunately, the period to frequency correlation is what my group and I struggled with,
Ezedonmwen 4
which then left us at no conclusion to find the mass ,
correctly. So far for this experiment, I have calculated everything up except the mass. I also found the damping, which does not correlate to my mass at all.