Hef Comtentecs Agence canacteme
Ingpection Agency inspection des akments
ATIP Services
1400 Mevvale Road
Tho.4u9
Ottawa, Ontario
KIAOYS
(Our File Number: A-2014-00216 / NF
March 4, 2015
Mr. James Thompson
38 Melgund Ave
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 282
Dear Mr. Thompson:
This refers to your request pursuant to the Access to Information Act for copies of
31 CFIA Inspection Verification Reports for Alberta North, for November 1, 2014 to January 31,
2015 and the corresponding MRAP (Management Review Action Plan) to address deficiencies in
the inspection report.
2. Western Area Record of Decision for Inspection, from November 1, 2014 to January 31, 2015.
ZThis Is signed by Craig Price in consultation with Kelvin Mathiuk, Rick James-Davies, and Bruce
Archibald.”
‘The Canadian Food Inspection Agency received your request on February 4, 2015
Enclosed, please find the documents peraining to your request. Portions of the information have been
‘exempted under section 21(1)(a), 21(1)(¢) of the Access 10 Information Act. copy of this section is
enciosed for your ease of reference.
This completes the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's response to your request. Should you have any
Questions. please communicate with Natasha Farina at (613) 773-6564 or by e-mail at
natasha
[email protected].
Please be advised that you are entitled to complain to the Information Commissioner concerning the
processing of your request within sity days ofthe receipt ofthis notice. In the event you decide to avail
yourself ofthis right, your notice of complaint should be addressed to
Suzanne Legault, Information Commissioner
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada
30 Victoria Streot
Gatineau, Québec KiA 1H3
Rocky Crupi
Team Leader
‘Access to Information and Privacy
Encl
CanadaAccess to Information Act
Loi sur I’accés a |'information
21, (1) The head of a government
21. (1) Le responsable dune institution
Institution may refuse to disclose any record _| fédérale peut refuser la communication de
‘requested under this Act that contains
(2) advice or recommendations developed
by or for @ government institution or @
minister of the Crown,
(0) an account of consultations or
Celiberations involving officers or
employees of @ government institution, a
‘minister of the Crown or the staff of a
minister of the Crown,
(@) positions or plans developed for the
Purpose of negotiations carried on or to be
‘ried on by or on behalf of the
Government of Canada and considerations
relating thereto, or
(q) plans relating to the management of
personnel or the administration of a
‘government institution that have not yet
been put into operation, if the record came
Into existence less than twenty years prior
to the request.
1980-81-82-83, ¢. 111, Sch. I '21",
documents datés de moins de vingt ans lors de
la demande et contenant :
4@) des avis ou recommandations élaborés
ar ou pour une institution fédérale ou un
ministre;
2) des comptes rendus de consultations ou
délibérations oi sont concernés des cadres
‘ou employés d'une institution fédérale, un
ministre ou son personnel;
© des projets préparés ou des
renseignements portant sur des positions
eenvisagées dans le cadre de négociations
‘menées ou & mener par le gouvernement
du Canada ou en son nom, ainsi que des
renseignements portant sur les
considerations qul y sont liges;
©) des projets relatifs 3 la gestion du
Personnel ou & ladministration d'une
institution fédérale et qui n‘ont pas encore
été mis en oeuvre,
1980-81-62-83, ch, 111, ann. I «21»,ei
8.211)
Rel Sarason Fooe seers
-——_—_——_—_ -—_——___ __ 2
Western Area
Record of inspection Decision
Title AAberta North Region Food inspection Stategy for Panned Werk Pian
Reductions
‘Summary of Situation Iman effort to ensure we live within our resources, we need tobe smart
bout deciding what work we will do now, what we will defer end what we
‘won't do at all, Inspectors have been advised that these types of decision are.
‘ot for them to make as individual contributors - the risk ofthese decisions is
for the Inspection Manager or the Regional Chief inspector.
Te that end, Brad Parker, Inspection Manager, has worked with his
{cadership team to develop 2 Food Inspection Strategy for Planned Work-
Plan Reductions (Attached).
“Regulatory Authoriles Canada Agricultural Products Act, Meat inspection Ani, Food & Drags AG,
Consumer Packaging and tabelling Act, Fish inspection act
These acts and related regulations prescribe standards that industry must
meet. Inspections are conducted to assess industry compliance with the
legislation. These Acts 60 not prescribe levels of inspection presence.
Poticy and Procedure or There are several policies, procedures and export requirements that @o
Collective agreement References Prescribe a level of inspection presence.
| Decision Taken, with Rationale
= | Ketvin Mathuik, Area Director General -2014-Dec-10 (ema)
Or. Rick James-Davies, Area Chief inspector — 2014.Dec-10 (email)
Yes,
concurrence wrch conse ation
Bre Hh, 2
~~” Decision Taken by:
eee, DEC 19 20%
ES Jompiement the decision effective January 1, 2015.
Canada
000018.21(1)(a)
s.21(14)
= = ork Pi juctior
Fiscal Year 2014/15
Craig for your consideration, the following is a plan to reduce work plan activities
for the balance of the fiscal year 2014/15. Meat Hygiene processing plan for
implementation is based on a Jan S" date. Agri-Food/Fish and IMFP used a
December 1/14 to March 31/15 implementation period,
4. Meat Hygiene Processing — planned reductions
RDIMS #5 188863, PagetPages 3to/a8
are withheld pursuant to sections
sont retenues en vertu des articles
24(1)(a), 24(1)(d)
of the Access to Information
de la Loi sur l'accSs ... l'information