LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION
JoAnn (Jodi) Crandall a1
a1 University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Abstract
Language teacher education programs are likely to be housed in departments of
applied
linguistics,
education,
or
languages
and
literature:
These
three
disciplines provide the knowledge base and opportunities for developing skills
and dispositions for both prospective and experienced teachers. Until recently,
applied
linguistics
(psycholinguistics,
sociolinguistics,
discourse
analysis,
language description, and language teaching and testing methodology) formed
the core of language teacher education, not unexpected, since language
teaching has historically been the primary focus of applied linguistics (BardoviHarlig and Hartford 1997, Crandall 1995; 1996). However, during the last
decade, general educational theory and practice have exerted a much more
powerful influence on the direction of the education of both preservice and
inservice language teacher education, resulting in a greater focus on: 1) practical
experiences such as observations, practice teaching, and opportunities for
curriculum
and
materials
development
(Crandall
1994,
Johnson
1996b,
Pennington 1990, Richards 1990, Richards and Crookes 1988); 2) classroomcentered or teacher research (Allwright and Bailey 1991, Chaudron 1988, Edge
and Richards 1993, Nunan 1989, van Lier 1988); and 3) teacher beliefs and
teacher cognition in language teacher education (Freeman 1996; 1998, Freeman
and Johnson 1998a, Richards and Nunan 1990). In fact, the last decade can be
viewed as a search for a theory of language teaching and, by extension, of
language teacher education at both the micro and macro levels (Freeman and
Johnson 1998b, Johnson 1996a, Larsen-Freeman 1990, Richards 1990). Language
teacher education is a microcosm of teacher education, and many of the trends
in current language teacher education derive from theory and practice in general
teacher education. These trends include at least four major shifts.