Preliminery Ehs For Caustic Soda Plant
Preliminery Ehs For Caustic Soda Plant
Al Ghaith Industries
Prepared by:
Project Title:
Report Title:
Project No:
44130065
Report Ref:
44130065-REP-001
Status:
Initial Issue
Almamoon Al-Baadani
Al Ghaith Industries
URS Corporation Abu Dhabi
Issued By:
Name
Signature
Date
Position
Prepared
by
David Monaghan
Checked
and
approved
by
Andrew J Wilson
Principal Consultant
Date
Details of Revisions
?? August 2011
LIMITATION
URS has prepared this Report for the sole use of in accordance with the Agreement under which our
services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional
advice included in this Report or any other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied
upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. Unless otherwise
stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be
used for their current purpose without significant change. The conclusions and recommendations
contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that
all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested.
Information obtained from third parties has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise
stated in the Report.
COPYRIGHT
This Report is the copyright of URS Corporation Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage
by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
CONTENTS
Section
1.
INTRODUCTION
Page No
18
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
Summary
Error! Bookmark not defined.
Need for Project
18
Policy and Standards 23
Scope 24
2.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1.
2.1.1.
2.1.2.
2.1.3.
2.1.4.
2.1.5.
2.1.6.
2.1.7.
2.1.8.
2.1.9.
2.1.10.
2.1.11.
2.1.12.
2.1.13.
2.1.14.
2.1.15.
2.1.16.
2.1.17.
2.1.18.
2.1.19.
2.1.20.
2.1.21.
2.1.22.
Overview
27
Unloading and Storage of Salt 39
Brine Purification Process
40
Electrolysis Process
44
Brine Dechlorination
46
Hydrogen Gas Processing
47
Chlorine Gas Cooling 47
Caustic Concentration & Flaking Plant 47
Sodium Hypochlorite Plant
49
Hydrochloric Acid Plant 51
Demineralized water system 52
Cooling water unit
52
Chilled water system 53
Compressed air system
53
Steam supply system 53
Control and instrumentation system
53
Bagging Unit 54
Transportation System 54
Facility Construction
54
Air Emissions Control 55
Wastewater Treatment and Management
58
Solid Waste Treatment and Management
59
Fire and Toxic Gas Release Prevention and Control
3.
3.1.1.
3.1.2.
3.1.3.
3.1.4.
3.1.5.
3.1.6.
3.1.7.
3.1.8.
3.1.9.
3.1.10.
4.
4.1.
Air Emissions 74
27
60
CONTENTS
Section
Page No
Appendix A Figures
Photographs
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TBC
2.
INTRODUCTION
2.1.
2.2.
PER Consultants
URS Corporation Abu Dhabi (URS) has prepared this Preliminary Environment, Health
and Safety Review (PEHSR) on behalf of the Project proponents, Al Ghaith. The PEHSR
has been produced in accordance with the Environment Agency Abu Dhabi (EAD)
Technical Guidance Document for Preliminary Environmental Review (PER), and
Zonescorp Code of Practise on Environmental Health & Safety Impact Assessment
(EHS04). URS is an EAD-registered Class-A Environmental consultant. The name,
address, telephone number, and fax number of URS are detailed below:
URS Corporation Abu Dhabi
Mr Peter Mueller
Country Manager - UAE
102 Al Dhafra Tower
Istiqlal Street,
PO Box 43855, Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates
Tel: +971 2 634 3365
Fax: +971 2 634 3374
Email: [email protected]
www.urscorp.eu
This PEHSR was prepared by Mr. David Monaghan (Air Quality Scientist) and reviewed
by Mr. Andrew J Wilson (Principal Consultant). In addition to the above-mentioned project
team, URS have drawn upon other professional and technical staff in our Abu Dhabi office
including: Dominic Adams (Senior Geologist), and Angela Nicholson (Environmental
Scientist). We can provide additional resources, including US-based environmental and
engineering professionals as requested. The primary contact within URS for the ChloroAlkali Project is:
Mr. David Monaghan, Project Manager
Email: [email protected]
URS has extensive experience in undertaking large-scale, complex environment, health
and safety impact assessments across a wide range of sectors and has a long history of
providing innovative, cost-effective solutions to our clients engineering and environmental
needs. URS has strong capabilities in the areas of:
Environmental compliance;
including ecological surveyor, technical advisor, lead author, and project manager. She
has worked with a variety of stakeholders and clients including government agencies,
private companies, and non-governmental organizations in a variety of sectors, and also
has a strong background in environmental and technical reporting and analysis.
2.3.
Product
Capacity per
day
179 MT / Day
59,000 MT/Year
70 MT/ Day
23,100 MT/Year
70 MT/ Dat
23,100 MT/Year
This PEHSR study will focus on construction, commissioning and operation of the
Project, and will culminate in the submission of this report to Zonescorp and EAD for
review and approval.
2.4.
That all accident hazards have been identified and suitable control, mitigation and
recovery measures are proposed (for projects) or are implemented (for existing
facilities or operations). It must be demonstrated that operation can be achieved
within the Zonescorp quantitative criteria for risk tolerability and compliance with As
Low As Reasonabliy Practicable (ALARP) must be demonstrated in accordance with
principles that are compatible with those provided in Zonescorp CoP on EHS Risk
Management (CoP EHS03).
d. That all Occupational Health Risks have been systematically identified and suitable
action to mitigate these risks and to protect employees from these risks have been or
will be taken in accordance with Zonescorp CoP on EHS Risk Management (CoP
EHS03).
e. How all HSE risk - including that resulting from moderate and low risk hazards - will be
managed and controlled by Al Ghaith or project/site/operations specific EHS
Management Systems. Refer to Zonescorp CoP on EHS Management Systems (CoP
EHS02).
f.
That Emergency Response Plans (on-site and off-site where necessary) in relation to
Major Accident Hazards have or will be prepared based on credible emergency
scenarios, with the necessary stakeholder consultation. Refer to Zonescorp CoP on
Crisis Management Plan (CoP FE05).
In order to complete this PEHSR the following schedule has been followed. A project
Gantt Chart is shown in Table 2- 1 -1.
Sub-Task
1
10
11
Week
12 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
3.
3.1.
3.2.
EAD Standard Operating Procedures for Permitting of New Projects and Activities
in Abu Dhabi.
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Federal Law No. (8) of 1980;
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Ministerial Order No. (32) of 1982;
Federal Law No. (7) of 1993 concerning the establishment of the FEA;
Federal Law No. (24) of 1999 for the Protection and Development of the
Environment and subsequent Decree No. (37) for 2001 Executive Guidelines for
Federal Law No 24 of 1999, concerning Environmental Protection &
Development prescribing regulations pertaining to the following systems:
o
Protected Areas.
Federal Law No. (21) of 2005 for Waste Management in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi;
Federal Law No. (16) of 2005 concerning the reorganization of the Abu Dhabi
Environment Agency, replacing Federal Law No. (4) of 1996 as amended by Law
No. (1) for 1997, specifying EAD as the competent body for implementing federal
environmental law; and
Of these Federal Law No. (24) for 1999 provides the overarching framework for
environmental considerations in the UAE. This law aims to achieve the following goals:
Protection and conservation of the quality and natural balance of the environment.
Protection of society, human health and the health of other living creatures from
activities and acts that are environmentally harmful or impede authorized use of
the environmental setting.
Protection of the UAE environment from the harmful effects of activities undertaken
outside the region of the UAE.
Regulation for the Protection of the Maritime Environment. This is concerned with
the prevention of pollution of the marine environment from vessels, land based
sources and offshore platforms.
Furthermore the Executive Guidelines for Federal Law No. (24) for 1999, Concerning
Environmental Protection and Development, Decree No. (37) for 2001, states the
requirement to have a permit for new projects through EAD, and also states that
when analyzing the expected environmental reactions, the following elements must
be taken into consideration when conducting and EIA:
A) Any environmental impact on the ecological system that might get affected by the
project / activity.
B) Any impact on an Area/Place/or building that has an archaeological, amusement,
architectural, cultural, historical, scientific, or social values, or has other environmental
characterizes that form a value for the existing or future generations.
3.3.
Abu Dhabi Local Law No. (4) for 1996 (as amended)
As such, EAD is the nominated authority for implementing laws including Federal Law No.
(24) for 1999 and Decision No. 42 of 2009 Concerning the Environment, Health and
Safety Management System in Abu Dhabi Emirate (EHSMS Law)
The Competent Authority for this project, EAD, is responsible for the evaluation of the
environmental impacts of the project and the issue of associated permits and licenses.
EAD standards and guidelines of relevance to the Project which will be adhered to
include:
Standard Operating Procedures for Permitting of New Projects and Activities in Abu
Dhabi (SOP PNPS-01, 2002).
It should be noted that EAD has since issued updated standards and guidance The PEHSR will,
however, be produced in line with the new guidelines in so far as is possible. The new guidelines
include:
3.4.
Abu Dhabi Environment, Health and Safety Management System (EHSMS) and
associated Codes of Practice (CoP).
United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change for the year 1992;
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil, 1954 and
its amendments;
International convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC) 1969;
Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides
in International Trade (PIC Convention) 1998.
4.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4.1.
Statement of Need
Chlorine is essential to chemical industry; more than 85% of all pharmaceuticals and
more than half the products marketed by the chemical industries are derivatives of
Chlorine chemistry. Almost 1,500 of these products are used in different industrial and
economic sectors such as health, agro-food, building, textiles, transport, leisure activities,
cosmetics etc.
With every tonne of Chlorine that is produced 1.1 tonnes of Caustic Soda are also made.
More than half of the Caustic Soda manufactured is used in the chemical industry and the
rest goes into products such as soap and textiles, or is used in water treatment,
aluminium production and oil refining.
The UAE government has established heavy industry in order to increase diversification
of the economy. Foreign firms have been employed to provide expertise in planning,
construction, management and marketing in return for minority shares in the companies.
Oil revenues have funded the construction of plants and the development of
infrastructure; natural gas has been used as a source of power and as feedstock.
Petroleum and natural gas industries and their related manufacturing are the basis of the
national economy in the UAE.
A limited local production of Caustic Soda exists in Abu Dhabi, hence the requirement to
develop a local manufacturing plant that will provide additional supply to the required
industries.
4.2.
South-West boundary:
North-East boundary:
South-East boundary:
4.3.
Product
Capacity /Day
Capacity / Year
179 MT / Day
59,000 MT/Year
70 MT/ Day
23,100 MT/Year
70 MT/ Dat
23,100 MT/Year
Approximately, 2.588 Tons/hour of Chlorine gas and 0.0729 Tons/hour of Hydrogen gas
will also be produced as intermediate products during the electrolysis process. All
chlorine and hydrogen gas produced will be fed back into the production process and
converted to HCl and NaOCl, thus there will be no venting of chlorine or hydrogen during
normal operations.
The main raw material & chemicals consumed within the proposed project are presented
in the following Error: Reference source not found. All consumption figures are based on
per metric ton of caustic soda production (as 100%).
Acids and chemical precipitants will be used to remove impurities in salt/brine and in the
products. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or other ozone-depleting substances will not be utilized
at the Chlor-Alkali Plant.
The following ancillary materials will be used in various stages of the Chlor-Alkali industrial
process:
HCl will be used for pH adjustment of cells and also used for dechlorination of
brine;
Sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3) will be used for dechlorination of brine and in the final
stage to eliminate chlorine; and
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) will be used for removal of magnesium and heavy
metals.
The proposed project will comprise of a series of operations, as shown in Figure 4 -3.
The following are the major processes/operations involved in the project, and are
described in the subsequent sections:
1. Unloading and Storage;
2. Brine Purification;
3. Electrolytic Process;
4. Brine Re-saturation and Dechlorination;
5. Chlorine Gas Processing - Cooling and Treatment;
6. Hydrogen Cooling;
7. Production of Hydrogen Chloride;
8. Production of Sodium Hypochlorite;
9. Caustic Solution Concentration (Flaking Unit); and
10. Caustic Solution Concentration (Flaking Unit).
Other utilities and secondary operations, as listed below, will also be involved in the
proposed Al Ghaith project plant.
1. Demineralized Water (DM) system;
2. Cooling Water System;
3. Chilled Water System;
4. Compressed Air System;
5. Steam Supply System (Boiler);
6. Control and Instrumentation System;
7. Bagging Unit; and
8. Transportation System.
Following are the control measures included at the proposed Al Ghaith project plant.
1. Air Emissions Control;
2. Wastewater Treatment and Management;
3. Waste Treatment and Management; and
4. Fire and Toxic Gas Release Prevention and Control.
SL No
Storage
Proposed capacity
Remarks
materials
and description
Remarks
Salt
Caustic Soda
(50%)
7 m diameter x
8 m height
Mild steel
6 tanks x 150 m3
32% HCl
5.5 m diameter x
7 m height
4 tanks x 100 m3
4.5 m diameter x
6 m height
Rubber-lined from
inside.
Sodium
Hypochlorite
FRP or derakane-lined
Caustic soda
5,000 m3
Flakes
Covered Shed
Flow indication and control valves are installed in all the liquid lines connected to the ion
exchange system in order to automatically control the flow rates.
The resin regeneration process involves the following steps.
HCl regeneration
Caustic regeneration
Figure 4-7 Electrolyzer cell in operational reference plants (INEOS & AKCC)
A two-phase process stream of depleted brine and wet chlorine gas overflows from each
anode chamber and is separated at the collection manifold. The depleted brine will flow
by gravity through the branch pipe and common header into the depleted brine tank,
while the chlorine gas will be sent to chlorine gas processing section.
Depleted brine will be pumped to depleted brine dechlorination system by level controller.
Two hydrochloric acid additions have been considered for the brine recycling system in
order to maintain a low oxygen concentration in the chlorine gas. One will be located at
the inlet of the depleted brine tank, while the other will be situated at the cell feed brine
line.
Two types of chlorine gas seal pots will be installed to protect the electrolysers from
excessive pressure surging in process upset conditions: one for positive pressure relief
and another for negative pressure. Chlorine gas header pressure in the cell room will be
maintained by the pressure control of chlorine at cooler inlet. Recycled caustic will be fed
to electrolyser manifold through a caustic heat exchanger and then distributed to each
cathode chamber. The recycle caustic flow rate will be controlled by the flow controller
installed in the caustic feed line.
it is heated to approximately 430 C. The flue gases pass through a combustion air preheater and are then vented through a stack into the atmosphere. The burner placed on
top of the molten salt heater, is designed for operation with preheated combustion air.
The highly concentrated caustic melt leaves the final concentrator through seal pot and is
fed by gravity to a specially designed flaking machine, where it is processed into flakes at
low temperature. The flakes are fed by gravity to a semi-automatic bagging scale. The
bagging scale is of air tight design in order to avoid moisture pick-up of the hygroscopic
flakes. The filled bag will be transported via a conveyor to the bag closing machine. The
bag is a double walled bag with a PE inline and a PP woven outer bag. The PE inline is
closed manually by a drill binder and the PP woven outer bag will be closed by a sewing
machine.
4.3.7.3. Mode C - Evaporation and Concentration/ Flaking
In this mode liquid caustic and flakes can be produced at the same time. The process
description is, in principle, the same as for Mode B concentration and flaking.
However, the process parameters are slightly different. The concentration after the first
evaporation stage is about 40% NaOH. The concentration after the second evaporation
stage is 50% NaOH.
After the second evaporation stage the caustic flow is split into two streams, one feeding
the final concentrator and the second one leading to the battery limit. The caustic going
to the battery limit is passes through a set of two heat exchangers where the caustic is
cooled down to a temperature of 45 C.
The concentration plant is working with the same principle as described under mode B
except that the feed concentration is 50% instead of 61% NaOH. The plant is controlled
by instruments to ensure fully automatic operation of the process. Operating personnel
are required only at the bagging and bag closing station. However, start up and shut
down of the plant requires some manual interactions.
Chlorine gas from chlorine section as well as any leaked chlorine is sucked into the plant
through a suction blower. This blower handles only unabsorbed air and water vapors.
1st stage absorption
The 1st stage absorption system shall consist of caustic circulation tank, circulation pump,
chilled water PHE and packed column absorber. The 1 st absorber will face concentrated
chlorine. The maximum chlorine will get absorbed at this stage. Diluted caustic will be
circulated in the absorber from caustic circulation tank and pumped for absorption of
chlorine from passing through chilled water PHE to remove the heat of reaction. When
the batch is ready the same is transferred to sodium hypochlorite storage tank and fresh
diluted caustic is taken from polishing tower / 2nd absorber tank.
The reaction in the sodium hypochlorite plant can be summarized as below:
2 NaOH + Cl2 NaOCl + NaCl + H2O
Normally to get a stable product, 10 to 20 gpl of excess alkali is maintained in the product
and before transferring it is ensured that available chlorine is 150 gpl.
2nd Stage Absorption System
Since some chlorine will escape from 1 st absorber the 2nd stage absorption system will be
installed to absorb the remaining chlorine from waste air.
Additionally, this system will consist of one packed absorber with one circulation tank,
circulation pumps and plate heat exchanger.
The 2nd stage system consists of:
H2
(Gas)
Cl2
(Gas)
2HCl
(Gas)
This exothermic reaction generates a flame temperature of around 2,500C, and a heat
load of approximately 1,000 kCal / kg of HCl when producing a cooled 33% aqueous
phase of HCl. The combustion process is operated with a slight excess of H 2 over
stoichiometric conditions operating the system with this excess of H 2 ensures the
complete Combustion of chlorine gas, thus preventing it from escaping into atmosphere
and producing a pure hydrochloric acid.
4.3.9.2. Synthesis Unit
The heart of the process is synthesis unit (or integrated burner absorber), constructed of
impregnated graphite materials encased in a water-cooled shell. The functions / process
steps of the synthesis unit include:
Combustion;
Gas cooling;
Absorption; and
Solution cooling.
Hydrogen and chlorine gas enter the top of the synthesis unit and are burnt into a specific
burner designed to ensure the complete combustion. The burner consists of special
tubes fitted inside which are easily removable for maintenance.
The addition of absorption water to the HCl gas is carried out at the top of the unit. The
gases and absorption water are then cooled down in vertical channels at counter current
of service side cooling water circuit. The wetted parts of unit are of the selected material
to avoid any corrosion.
At the bottom outlet of absorber, the HCl solution is separated from the gas which is
processed in a tail gas tower scrubber to recover the remaining non-absorbed HCl gas.
The synthesis unit is normally operated close to atmospheric pressure, but it is protected
against over pressurization with a rupture disc. At the bottom of assembly, and vented to
a sump pot beneath the synthesis unit.
4.3.9.3. Tail Gas Tower:
The purpose of the tail gas tower is to absorb or to scrub the gases coming from the
bottom of absorber. The gas components are mainly inert with some burnt hydrogen and
a little unabsorbed HCl. The absorption water enters the top of the tail gas tower through
a distributor and flows downwards over a packing as the gases flow upwards to be
exhausted to atmosphere. During this operation, the remaining HCl will be absorbed.
4.3.9.4. Safety:
The overall control philosophy of the HCl synthesis system design is fail-safe, which is
defined by opening contacts under abnormal conditions. The following safety interlocks
are provided to either prevent the system from being started or to cause the system to
shut down & the purge itself.
Flame failure;
Low N2 gas pressure while purging the unit during startup; and
During operation, if either of the above events occurs, the synthesis unit shuts itself down
that a purge with nitrogen can be carried out.
In addition, the dry air system will be used for air blanketing (through various inlets) the
caustic flakes, starting from the hoppers up to the bagging area, in order to prevent the
flakes from absorbing the moisture.
Description
Meters
Voltage monitoring
equipment
pH meter, ORP
Conductivity
Cell House
All the process parameters (temperature, pressure,
flow etc)
Analyzers are linked with an Automated DCS with
safety trip logics
Civil works;
Pre-fabrication of piping spools and piping erection, testing and flushing systems
in all areas;
Construction phase impacts due to emissions of dust due to digging, piling and
other earth work;
Stack for natural-gas fired boiler (SPM, NOx, SOx, CH4, CO2);
The primary source of air contaminants during the construction phase will be the various
internal combustion engines used at the construction site, which will include both nonroad construction equipment and some on-road vehicles. These mobile sources will emit
carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NO x) and
sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere.
The operating horsepower of the equipment was estimated as the average horsepower
for a specific type of equipment utilizing the USEPA non-road emission factors.
Furthermore, since the specific number and type of equipment to be used onsite at any
given time has not yet been finalized, a conservative estimate of the type and number of
construction equipment to be used has been assumed. The corresponding NEVES
emission factors are presented in Table 4 -5 below. The maximum monthly and daily
estimated emissions during the construction period are summarized in Table 4 -6.
hp
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
VOCs
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
SO2
(g/bhp-hr)
Plate Compactors
3.1
0.83
9.3
0.93
Rollers
99
3.1
0.82
9.3
Excavators
143
5.2
0.71
10.75
0.93
Cranes
194
4.2
1.29
10.3
0.93
Off-Highway Trucks
489
2.8
0.86
9.6
0.87
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
77
6.8
1.43
10.1
0.93
Dumpers/Tenders
23
2.8
0.86
9.6
0.89
Generators < 50 hp
22
1.22
0.93
37
1.22
0.93
N/A
2.06
0.04
0.14
0.40
N/A
0.61
0.15
0.2
0.40
Bus*
N/A
1.56
0.49
3.93
0.40
50
5.0
1.22
8.0
0.93
Air Compressors
50
5.0
1.22
8.0
0.93
26
10
Qty
1
Rollers
99
6.0
1.6
17.9
1.8
Excavators
143
4.0
1.1
11.9
1.2
Cranes
194
4.8
1.3
14.3
1.44
Off-Highway Trucks
489
3.0
0.8
8.9
0.9
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
77
11.9
3.2
35.7
3.6
Dumpers/Tenders
23
6.0
1.6
17.9
1.8
Generators < 50 hp
22
11.9
3.2
35.7
3.6
37
23.8
6.4
71.4
7.2
***
10
59.5
16.0
178.5
18
***
59.5
16.0
178.5
18
Bus
***
Total Estimated Emissions
(kg/month)
Estimated Emissions (kg/day)
6.0
202
1.6
54
17.9
606
1.8
61
7.8
2.1
23.3
2.4
The movement of soils during construction activities will be anticipated to lead to the
generation of airborne dust. The occurrence and significance of dust generated by earthmoving operations will be difficult to estimate accurately, and depends upon
meteorological and ground conditions at the time and location of the earthwork.
Very small quantities of CO 2 emissions are released during the purification of brine with
sodium carbonate. It is estimated that 10 grams of carbon dioxide are released per ton of
caustic soda production. Fugitive CO2 emissions are also likely from the chlorine
destruction unit and handling.
During loading of caustic and NaOCl, fugitive emissions are not anticipated. However,
fugitive emissions are likely during HCl loading.
The depleted brine from the electrolysis section, containing free chlorine, will be
de-chlorinated in a brine de-chlorination tank where most of the free chlorine will
be stripped out by vacuum and the stripped chlorine gas will be sent to the main
chlorine gas header. The de-chlorinated brine leaving the de-chlorination tank
will be allowed to react with sodium bisulfite solution at a pH of 9-9.5 for further
removal of chlorine;
The steam boiler and the flaking unit will include low No x burners to effectively
reduce Nox emissions to meet the EAD permissible limit of 55 mg/Nm3. SOx
emissions will be below the MoEs permissible limit of 500 mg/Nm3;
Regular annual inspection of boiler and flaking unit will be conducted to avoid
any excess carbon dioxide release; and
A scrubbing unit with 95% efficiency will be provided to control fugitive emissions
during HCl loading.
Sulfate ions may often have a negative effect on the electrolysis process
(damages the anode coating). Bleeding of the brine treatment system will be
conducted periodically to reduce the levels of sodium sulfate and/or sodium
chlorate in the cells. Wastewater will be generated as result of bleeding of
the circuit.
As mentioned earlier, with the exception of blowdown water, the proposed plant will not
have any wastewater discharge from the cooling water unit.
Removal of brine filtration sludge by flushing with a weak HCl solution. The acid
will cause the precipitate to dissolve and the resultant solution will be discharged
with the liquid effluent to the onsite wastewater treatment plant; and
Tie-up of hydrogen gas generated in the cell room to the gas header;
4.4.
A little amount of hydrogen gas will be vented to the atmosphere during upset
conditions through safety release valves. Venting system will be so designed that
concentration level of hydrogen in air will be always less than 1% with following
auxiliary equipment:
o
Automatic purging of steam in the vent pipe (interlock with flame sensor
will be provided);
Installation of chlorine and hydrogen gas detectors in the electrolysis cell room;
Implementation of Waste Air Dechlorination (WAD) in the sodium hypo plant for
neutralizing quantity of waste gas arising out of electrolyzers operation. This
system, utilizing double-stage scrubbing mechanism, will be designed to
neutralize all chlorine produced at full capacity for 15 minutes;
The composition of the vent stream that will be vented from chlorine absorption
unit and WAD during the normal operation will be as follows:
HCl: Nil
Transportation of the raw materials and finished goods (in and out of the plant,
respectively) will be conducted safely and will be in compliance with applicable
UAE rules and regulations and international conventions.
5.
Air Quality
The climate of the region is bi-seasonal, characterised by high temperatures and low
rainfall. The summers (May to October) are distinctly hot, with daytime temperatures
regularly exceeding 40C. Rainfall occurs occasionally during the summer, but is
generally restricted to the cooler winter months (November to April) when temperatures
can drop to 4C in some areas (usually inland) at night. Seasonal fluctuations in
temperatures are less well pronounced along the coast, where they are buffered by the
maritime influence.
Annual rainfall amounts vary according to location, but precipitation generally decreases
from north-east to southwest along the UAE. Coastal areas such as Abu Dhabi receive
about 80 mm of rain annually.
Fog occurs on 31 days or an average of 106 hours per year near the coast. Also near the
coast fog is more frequent in winter (76 days on average) than in summer to (48 days on
average). Fog incidence can last from half an hour to 10 hours, depending on the time of
formation and the weather conditions.
Humidity peaks in July and August at over 90%, and decreases through October, with the
least occurring from November through to April. The humidity over the cooler months can
fall to 10-20%.
The weather during much of the year is dominated by a ridge of high pressure extending
southwards into central Saudi Arabia with lower pressure over the eastern Gulf. The
result of this is the prevailing winds from the north and north western quadrants, known
by their Arabic name shamal, meaning north. Shamals occur mainly during the cooler
months, however they can also occur during the hot season, typically June and July.
Along the western coastal plain, sea breezes tend to dominate with light south southeasterlies at night being replaced by moderate northwesterly winds during daytime. A
strong northerly shamal is usually preceded in the UAE by strong southerly winds, raising
desert sands and reducing visibility. The shift to northerly winds may be quite sudden
and can be accompanied by rain, thunderstorms, or dust storms.
5.1.1.2.
The main source of air pollutants in Musaffah is traffic in addition to different industrial
activities, all contributing to emissions from small workshops and larger industrial
processes in the area.
Figure 5-10 1-hour average NO2 concentrations (g/m3) from traffic emissions in Abu Dhabi
city (EAD, 2007)
Figure 5-11 Maximum 1-hour average NO2 concentrations (g/m3) from traffic and industrial
emissions in Abu Dhabi city (EAD, 2007)
SO2
The maximum 1-hour SO2 concentrations in Abu Dhabi city and surroundings does not
exceed the one-hour air quality guideline for SO 2 (350 g/m3), but it reaches a maximum
of 250 g/m3 in MIA (Error: Reference source not found). In the centre of Abu Dhabi city
the maximum 1-hour SO2 concentrations are between 100 and 125 g/m 3.
Figure 5-12 Maximum 1-hour average SO2 concentration (g/m3) from traffic and industrial
emissions in Abu Dhabi city (EAD, 2007)
Additionally, air quality in MIA was also measured in 2008 by a mobile laboratory over a
10-day period during the summer months. The mean measured values were averaged
to 1 hour, 8 hour, 24 hour and/or 1 year values for the parameters for which applicable
EAD Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) exist. Neither the measurements nor the
calculated averaged values (Error: Reference source not found) exhibited exceedances
of the EAD AAQS parameters, except PM 10. For PM10, the 10-day measured value mean
and the calculated averaged value both exceeded the respective EAD AAQS. This can
be attributed to the emissions from industrial activity with in MIA as well as the naturally
high levels of PM10 occurring in the region due to its sandy top land profile (EAD, 2007).
This averaging was carried out using an in-house calculation method. The averaged values were derived from
the 10-day measured mean value.
Minimum
Maximum
NOX
NO
83.7
20.2
4.5
0
446.4
120.9
NO2
52.8
3.3
120.2
SO2
14.7
1.9
67.2
H2 S
9.7
2.6
24.3
CO
0.6
0.1
1.5
O3
41.4
126.3
PM10
135
28
572
Calculated
Averaged Value
(compared to
Mean)
Averaging
Period
EAD
AAQS
N/A
N/A
N/A
158.0
83.7
44.0
23.3
7.2
N/A
1.8
1.2
123.9
81.7
214.0
1 hour
24 hour
1 hour
24 hour
1 year
N/A
1 hour
8 hour
1 hour
8 hour
24 hour
400
150
350
150
60
N/A
30,000
10,000
200
120
150
(g/m3)
More recently, the ADNOC carried out continuous air quality monitoring employing a
mobile air quality monitoring station (trailer) positioned at the ESNAAD MIA site between
11 May, 2009 and 27 September, 2009. The parameters monitored were: SO 2, NO2, O3,
CO, PM10, NMHC, CH4 and H2S. Details of the monitoring methodology and reporting are
available in the Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at ESNAAD report produced by Nahla
Medical Supplies (Nahla Medical Supplies, 2009).
In summary, the monitoring results demonstrated that NO 2 1 hour and 24 hour averaged
concentrations, SO2 1 hour and 24 hour averaged concentrations, and CO 1 hour and 8
hour averaged concentrations were in compliance with their applicable corresponding
Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS).
For O3, the 1 hour averaged concentration was in compliance with the applicable
corresponding AAQS. The 8 hour averaged concentration, however, exceeded the
applicable corresponding AAQS 9, 6, 2 and 2 times in May, June, July and August 2009
respectively.
For PM10, 24 hour averaged concentration exceeded the applicable corresponding
ADNOC AAQS 3, 21, 22, 18 and 6 times in May, June, July and August 2009 respectively.
According to the survey report (Nahla Medical Supplies, 2009), these exceedances can
be attributed to a dust haze episode occurring over the Middle East during the monitoring
period.
Construction
During the construction period, operation of vehicles and construction equipment with
internal combustion engines will lead to exhaust emissions of combustion products
including NO2, SO2, CO and PM10. Small amounts of volatile organic carbon compounds
(VOC) may also be emitted from unburned fuel in the equipment engine exhausts or other
fugitive emission sources such as fuel pipe fittings.
The air emissions inventory for all construction activities is presented in Table 4-4 and 45, in Section 4.3.18.
Due to the industrial nature of the Project area and existing operational emission sources
in adjacent industrial plants, incremental additions to the existing pollutant concentrations
from construction activities will be relatively small, transient, and restricted to the
immediate vicinity of the work site (i.e. within approximately 500 meters downwind of the
construction activity). It is to be noted that levels of particulate matter (PM 10) in the air are
already high in the region due to the surrounding desert environment, existing soil
disturbance, and winds.
Based on the above information, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to
air quality in the Project area for this aspect due to construction activities is of low risk.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Rare
Minor
Low Risk
Operation
This section presents the air quality impact assessment from potential air quality impacts
associated with normal operations of the proposed Chlor-Alkali Plant. The air quality
impacts have been assessed in terms of predicted changes to air quality in the vicinity of
the proposed plant.
Atmospheric emissions will be generated through the operation of gas-fired plant
equipment, boiler, and flaking unit within the plant site. The Chlor-Alkali Plant process
design will utilize low-NOx burners for its single steam boiler and flaking unit that will
comply with EAD equipment-specific emission standards. The air emissions inventory for
all construction activities is presented in Table 4-4 and 4-5, in Section 4.3.18.
Most of the emission sources are not expected to have high criteria or GHG emissions.
The GHG emissions from these stacks will be mostly CO 2 and negligible quantities of
Methane during certain phases of the process cycle. The process will also be equipped
for hydrogen venting during emergencies. These venting events will be of very brief
duration and are not expected to have any significant impact on the air quality.
The primary criteria air contaminants of interest for the Chlor-Alkali Plant project are NOx
and SO2, both of which are combustion derived. The proposed Chlor-Alkali Plant will emit
an overall total of 5 tons NO x/year and 32 tons SO2/year. Since the proposed project will
combust only natural gas, the resultant impact from CO and PM 10 will be minimal.
Due to the nominal magnitude of the NO x and SO2 emissions from the Chlor-Alkali Plant,
air quality dispersion modeling was not performed. The balance of the criteria pollutant
(i.e., CO, VOC and particulates) emissions are typically not under consideration for air
quality modeling.
Based on the above information, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to
air quality in the Project area for this aspect due to construction activities is of moderate
risk.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Likely
Minor
Moderate Risk
Decommissioning
At the end of lifecycle of the Chlor-Alkali Plant, it is assumed all the assets of the site will
be decommissioned and the site will be restored, so far as is possible, to its original
condition. It is also assumed, therefore, that the foundations of the plant will also be
removed.
The impacts to air from operation of fuel consuming vehicles and equipment are likely to
be very similar to those of the construction phase. Therefore, it is considered that the
overall environmental impact to air quality in the Project area for this aspect due to
decommissioning activities is of low risk.
5.1.2.2.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Rare
Minor
Low Risk
Construction
Accidental liquid or solid fuelled fires during construction activities would lead to
deterioration of ambient air quality. These fire(s) can be caused due to the presence of
an ignition source in the vicinity of the fuel storage tanks or an electrical short-circuit
taking place in the equipments internal or external wiring connections. Such a situation
would lead to emission of typical combustion products such as CO, NO x, SO2 etc.
In addition to this, ignition of any flammable maintenance-related chemicals within the site
temporary facilities or site, as well as occupation of the site offices by construction
personnel poses a risk to ambient air quality due to a fire occurring within these buildings.
Potential causal factors for this could include human accidents involving ignition sources
Consequence
Significant
Rare
Minor
Low Risk
Operation
Accidental chlorine gas release impacts generally associated with chlor-alkali industrial
facilities are unlikely to occur during the operation of Chlor-Alkali Plant based on the
proposed preventive and control measures.
The common causes of chlorine gas release at chor-alkali facilities are listed below.
These causes are ranked in the order of severity of the leak and the hazard posed by its
occurrence.
1. Fire
2. Flexible connection failure
3. Fusible plug corrosion
4. Accidents caused by carelessness and ignorance
5. Valve packing failure
6. Gasket failure
7. Piping failure
8. Equipment failure
9. Physical damage of containers in collision accidents
10. Container failure
11. Chlorine pressure gauge failure
The USEPA has determined that chlorine is not a persistent pollutant, in that it photolyzes
rapidly to hydrochloric acid (HCl), a much less toxic substance, following the release.
Chlorine, as a powerful oxidizer, attacks the lungs, causing inflammation (pneumonitis)
and fluid accumulation (pulmonary edema), and is intensely irritating to the eyes;
prolonged and/or acute exposure may be fatal. Table 5 -8 below summarizes typical
symptoms of exposure to various concentrations of chlorine.
Table 5-8: Summary of Chlorine Health Effects
Concentration (ppm in air)
Health Effects
1-3 ppm
5-15 ppm
30 ppm
40-60 ppm
430 ppm
1,000 ppm
The Emergency Response Planning Guideline Level 2 (ERPG-2) value for chlorine gas is
3 ppm, which is set as end point concentrations for chlorine gas plume during emergency
response.
ERPG-2 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed that nearly all
individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing or developing
irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms which could impair an individuals
ability to take protective action.
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) publishes ERPG levels for various
chemicals (http://www.aiha.org/Committees/documents/erpglevels.pdf.). If an EPRG-2
value has been published, the Emergency Response Guideline uses this number for
setting the Protective Action Distance (PAD). If an ERPG-2 value has not been
established, the PAD is set at 0.01 x Lethal Concentration (LC) 50.
The other useful exposure limits for chlorine are presented below in Table 5 -9.
Permissible Exposure,
(ppm)
Description
National
Institute
of
Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH)
0.5
Recommended
Limit (REL)
American Conference of
Governmental Industrial
Hygienist (ACGIH)
0.5
0.5
USEPA
0.5
1.0
NIOSH
1.0
ACGIH
1.0
STEL
UK HSE
1.0
STEL, OEL
NIOSH
10
Immediately Dangerous to
Life or Health (IDLH)
Exposure
Therefore, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to air quality in the
Project area for this aspect due to operational activities is of moderate risk.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Rare
Major
Moderate Risk
Decommissioning
At the end of the lifecycle of the Chlor-Alkali Plant, it is assumed all the assets of the site
will be decommissioned and the site will be restored, so far as is possible, to its original
condition. It is also assumed, therefore, that the foundations of the plant will also be
removed.
The impacts to air from accidental events occurring are likely to be very similar to those of
the construction phase, especially due to the similar equipments that will be used during
both phases, as well as movement of flammable substances off site. In the events of a
fire occurring due to an accident during the decommissioning activities, typical
combustion products will be emitted. Similar to the construction phase, it is expected that
air quality impacts from any of the afore-mentioned events would only occur until the fire
is extinguished.
Therefore, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to air quality in the
Project area for this aspect due to decommissioning activities is of low risk.
5.1.2.3.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Rare
Minor
Low Risk
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol developed and issued by the World Resources Institute
and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD) defines
different sources of greenhouse gas emissions into a series of categories or scopes.
These definitions, as described below, have been used to determine the scope and
sources of emissions to be considered for the carbon footprint of the proposed Al Ghaith
Chlor-Alkali Plant:
Scope 1 Direct Emissions these are defined as GHG emissions from sources the
reporting company owns or controls including the following examples:
Scope 2 Indirect Emissions these are defined as GHG emissions from the generation of
purchased electricity that is consumed in a companys owned or controlled equipment or
operations.
Scope 3 Other Indirect Emissions these are defined as indirect GHG emissions that do
not fall within Scope 2.
Some of these activities will be included under scope 1 if the pertinent emission sources
are owned or controlled by the company (e.g., if the transportation of products is done in
vehicles owned or controlled by the company).
GHG emissions from the Chlor-Alkali Plant will consist primarily of nominal quantities of
CO2. CO2 emissions from normal operation of the natural gas fired units (boiler and
flaking unit) were estimated using USEPA AP-42 emission factors, and are provided in
Table 4 -5 and Table 4 -6. These estimates amount to a total of only 5521 t/year of CO 2.
This proportion is expected to be significantly lower based on future estimates of national
CO2 emissions when the Chlor-Alkali Plant is operational.
Fugitive emission of CO2 is likely during the purification of brine with sodium carbonate,
and it is estimated that 10 gm of carbon dioxide is released per ton of caustic soda
production. Fugitive CO2 emission is also likely from the chlorine destruction unit and
handling.
It is considered that the overall environmental impact to air quality in the Project area for
this aspect due to construction, operation and decommissioning is of low risk.
Probability
Consequence
Significant
Likely
Insignificant
Low Risk
Phase
Consequence
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Risk
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Construction
Rare
Operation
Minor
Emissions from
Operation of
Fuel-Consuming
Vehicles and
Plant Equipment
Low
Minor
Decommissioning
Rare
Low
Construction,
operation and
decommissioning
Consequence
Insignificant
Emissions of
Greenhouse
Gases
Phase
Likely
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Risk
Low
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Not Applicable
Phase
Consequence
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Risk
Construction
Minor
Rare
Emissions from
Accidental
Events
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Low
Major
Operation
Rare
Minor
Decommissioning
Rare
Low
5.1.3.2.
scrubber to produce sodium hypochlorite. The chlorine absorption unit will be designed
with a treatment capacity sufficient to absorb the full cell-room production in the event of
emergencies.
The chlorine absorption unit will lower the chlorine content in the emitted gas during
operation to less than 1.72 ppmv (5 mg/Nm3) in the worst-case scenario compared to 20
ppmv of USEPAs permissible limits - Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT).
In addition, the emitted HCl vapour will be less than 6.70 ppmv (10 mg/N m3) in the worstcase scenario compared to 12 ppmv of USEPAs permissible limits (MACT).
All of the hydrogen gas produced during electrolysis of salt in the production will be used
onsite as chemical feedstock for production of HCl in the HCl synthesis unit. The
hydrogen gas will be safely handled in the production of HCl by providing an emergency
vent in the process line. The entire vent system will be designed to include a flame sensor
and a steam and nitrogen purging mechanisms. In addition, the process safety relief
valves will be connected to vent system, and during process upset, these safety relief
valves will be activated for venting the hydrogen gas to avoid unsafe conditions. The
Chlor-Alkali Plant will also install hydrogen gas holder in the system to minimize the
process upsets and to reduce venting.
During loading of caustic and NaOCl, fugitive emissions are not anticipated. However,
fugitive emissions are likely during HCl loading. A small scrubbing unit with an efficiency
of 95% will be provided to control these fugitive emissions during HCl loading.
Expected HCl concentration at the loading area will be less than 0.033ppm (0.05 mg/m 3)
and the HCl concentration in the scrubber outlet during loading operation will be
approximately 0.17 ppm (0.25 mg/m3).
In summary, the air emissions under normal operations for the Al Ghaith Chlor-Alkali
project are not expected to have any significant impact.
Decommissioning
Same as for the Construction phase above.
Emissions of Greenhouse Gases
Construction, Operation and Decommissioning
The EPC Site Environmental Manager and/or EPC Maintenance Manager will encourage
implementation of good construction practices with respect to handling GHG containing
materials such as refrigerants, as mentioned in Section Error: Reference source not
found. This will be to ensure that fugitive emissions from improperly closed storage
containers are prevented.
This would typically involve ensuring that safety valves on refrigerant gas containing
cylinders are only opened when they are in use and otherwise kept normally shut to
reduce the potential for fugitive emissions.
However, the best form of mitigation would be to utilize alternate refrigerant gas that does
not have a GHG impact.
Emissions from Accidental Events
Construction
The EPC Site Environmental Manager will ensure that appropriate internal wiring is
utilised in construction machinery and it is run according to the manufacturers
specifications in order to reduce the potential for a fire occurring due to a short-circuit and
therefore the resulting combustion emissions. Additionally, it will also be ensured that the
machinery is regularly inspected and maintained in order to reduce the potential for nondesign performance of the equipment and therefore resulting higher direct exhaust
emissions.
The EPC Site Environmental Manager will also ensure that flammable chemicals on site
are temporarily stored in accordance with the manufacturers and MSDS requirements, in
order to reduce the potential for an accidental fire occurring.
As a further fire preventative measure, the EPC Site Environmental Manager will also
enforce an indoor no-smoking policy within the site buildings (i.e. offices) to reduce the
potential for human-induced fires occurring. Relevant employees will also be trained in
the measures to be followed in case a fire breaks out so that it can be controlled soon
after break-out and the risk to employees health reduced.
The EPC Site Environmental Manager will also prepare a project emergency response
strategy/plan addressing appropriate emergency procedures to be followed in case of a
fire occurring during construction works. Again, this will ensure that a fire can be
controlled soon after it breaks out and the risk of deterioration of ambient air quality and
employees health is reduced.
Operation
The potential for accidental release of chlorine gas poses a risk in chlor-alkali plants, and
that can be addressed on several levels requiring mitigation/control measures and
emergency response programs.
A quantitative risk assessment (QRA) will be performed at the Al Ghaith plant subsequent
to commissioning of the plant to further assess the accidental chlorine release hazards.
The caustic scrubber, with an overall operating efficiency of at least 95%, will be the
primary chlorine gas control device. As discussed earlier regarding the control measures,
entire chlorine gas produced will be sent to the main chlorine gas header in the HCl
synthesis unit. Moreover, chlorine-containing waste gas streams from the HCl synthesis
unit will be diverted to the chlorine absorption unit (hypo unit) where the gas will be
absorbed by diluted caustic in a double-staged scrubber to produce sodium hypochlorite.
The chlorine absorption unit will be designed with a treatment capacity sufficient to
absorb the full cell-room production in the event of emergencies.
Excess chlorine vented to the scrubber can deplete the active scrubbing material and
cause over-chlorination of the scrubber. This will result in release of toxic chlorine gas.
Therefore, active safeguards will be incorporated within scrubbing mechanism to avoid
over-chlorination.
Following active safeguards will be included in the scrubbers to prevent over-chlorination:
Use of contactors in the scrubbers to maintain slight vacuum on the chlorine vent
lines to reduce leaks to atmosphere.
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Daily
Daily
Daily
Monthly
Daily
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Operation
Monthly
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Project Phase
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Daily
Daily
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Monthly
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Industries
Reporting
Al Ghaith Environmental
Manager
Decommissioning
Responsibility
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Construction
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Quarterly
Al Ghaith
Operations Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Weekly
EPC Site
Maintenance
Coordinator
Monthly
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Weekly Environmental
Inspection Checklist,
Quarterly Environmental Audit
Report
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Operation
- Concentrations of CO2
Decommissioning
Monitoring Activity
Appropriate internal wiring utilized in
construction machinery
Project Phase
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Quarterly
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
N/A
Once
Al Ghaith Health
and Safety
Manager / Al
Ghaith Executive
Management
Quarterly
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Weekly
EPC Site
Maintenance
Coordinator
Monthly
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Weekly Environmental
Inspection Checklist,
Quarterly Environmental Audit
Report
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Operation
Project Phase
Monitoring Activity
Fire response procedure documented
and relevant employees trained in it
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Quarterly
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Monitoring programs suggested in Sections Error: Reference source not found will minimise the impact as far as considered
practical, with commitment to these measures provided in Section 7 Statement of Commitments of the EIA. These measures will
also be reflected in the EPC Contractors Project Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and the Al Ghaith
Industries Operations Environmental Management Plan (OEMP). Compliance monitoring carried out as part of implementation of
the afore-mentioned documentation (e.g. periodic inspections, audits) will assess for compliance of monitoring with the specified
mitigation measures.
5.1.4.2. Monitoring Program for Cumulative Impacts
The monitoring program presented in Section 5.1.4.1 is designed to help address both non-cumulative and cumulative impacts. No
additional monitoring is planned to deal with cumulative impacts specifically.
5.1.4.3. Monitoring Program for Residual Impacts
The monitoring program presented in Section 5.1.4.1 is designed to help evaluate residual impacts. No additional monitoring is
planned to deal with residual impacts specifically.
5.2.
Marine Water
5.3.
Waste Management
In case of contract with the private sector for transporting, storage, treatment or
disposal of waste, the following must be carried out by Environmental Service
Providers permitted by the Competent Authority.
Waste generated from the Project will be managed using a lifecycle approach, which
takes into account the HSE risks associated with storage, handling and disposal. The
guiding philosophy is to ensure where possible waste is reduced, reused or recycled.
This is achieved through a process of identifying the waste; maintaining an inventory;
characterising the wastes; segregation; and then looking for ways to minimise waste
generation. Certain plastics, metals, glass, paper products, waste oil, and organic
material will be recycled wherever possible.
The Abu Dhabi Municipality is responsible for municipal solid waste treatment and
disposal in the Emirate. There are approximately ten operational landfill sites within the
Emirate. The largest is the Al Dhafra landfill which is approximately 60 km south west of
Abu Dhabi city. It is expected this landfill will receive the majority of solid wastes
generated by the Chlor-Alkali Project. Recycling centres at the Al Dhafra landfill include
construction waste and a proposed tyre recycling facility. The Abu Dhabi Municipality has
also planned a composting facility, a new sanitary landfill, and an inert waste landfill area
beside the existing landfill at the Al Dhafra site. There are additional plans for five
transfer stations for solid waste in the Western Region on the sites of existing landfills; a
new sanitary landfill beside the site of the existing landfill of Ruwais; a green waste
composting facility at the Ruwais site; upgrade of the green waste composting facilities at
Liwa and Ghayathi, and improved transportation systems for waste between the different
sites.
Liquid wastes from Al Ghaith are planned to be treated at the 300,000-cubic-metre-a-day
(cm/d) Al-Wathba wastewater treatment plant in Abu Dhabi or the 65,000-cm/d Al-Saad
wastewater treatment plant in Al-Ain.
Hazardous wastes will be removed by the appointed Environmental Service Provider for
treatment and disposed at approved Municipality sites. Solid hazardous wastes are
mostly disposed to landfill however a specialised plant to treat 15,000 tonnes of
hazardous waste has been proposed by the Centre of Waste Management Abu Dhabi for
Al Dhafra, about 12km from the current landfill site.
Medical waste will be treated within Musaffah and then removed to Al Dhafra landfill for
disposal. In Abu Dhabi there are currently only two private companies that collect,
transfer and treat medical waste by non-incineration techniques.
Hazardous liquid industrial wastes will be treated on site before being either discharged
into a sewerage network through consent with Abu Dhabi Sewerage Services Company
(ADSSC) or given to an appointed Environmental Service Provider for treatment and
disposal.
Solid Waste
Construction
The Al Ghaith Project will generate approximately 50 m 3/week of solid waste during the
construction phase. This may comprise of scrap metal, timber, rocks, plastic, insulation
and packing material used for transport of materials; used lubricating oils, solvents and
cleaners from the maintenance of construction equipment; paint; and other wastes.
These could potentially impact the soil and groundwater.
Solid waste management on site will be described in detail in the CEMP and be done in
accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Given the control measures in place the magnitude of impacts from solid waste during
construction is considered to be local to the project site. Waste arising from construction
operations will occur but will be limited to a finite time period. The consequence of
disposing this waste from site will be insignificant. Overall, the risk posed by effectively
managed waste disposal will be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
Solid wastes generated at the Chlor-Alkali Plant during the brine purification will consist of
used materials such as pre-coat and feed material made of cellulose. The pre-coat filter
sludge from the brine softener will consist mainly of alpha-cellulose, contaminated with
iron hydroxide and silica.
During operation of sludge filtration, Chlor-Alkali Plant is expected to produce
approximately 475 tons of brine sludge waste /year.
The sludge filtration system will consist of:
Sludge filter
Sludge conveyer
Filtrate tank
Associated pumps
Spent membranes and gaskets from membrane cells will be other waste streams
remaining after their service life. Solid waste management on site will be done in
accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Waste from site will require frequent disposal, however the consequence of disposing this
waste from site will be insignificant. Overall, the risk posed by effectively managed waste
disposal will be moderate.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Frequent
Insignificant
Moderate
Decommissioning
Decommissioning of the Al Ghaith Plant is expected to create a significant quantity of
solid waste, and waste water.
Solid waste management on site will be described in detail in the DEMP and be done in
accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Given the control measures in place the magnitude of impacts from solid waste during
construction is considered to be local to the project site. Waste arising from construction
operations will occur but will be limited to a finite time period. The consequence of
disposing this waste from site will be insignificant. Overall, the risk posed by effectively
managed waste disposal will be low.
5.3.2.2.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Liquid Waste
Construction
It is expected that the Al Ghaith Project construction workers (approximately 500 workers)
will be housed within existing worker camp/camps located in the MIA labour camp area,
and as a result, approximately 62,500 litres of sanitary wastewater will be generated per
day.
Aqueous commissioning wastewater will be generated (the bulk being approximately 300
m
3) during hydro-testing; although it should be noted that hydro-testing will take place
infrequently) during the commissioning process.
Liquid waste management on site will be described in detail in the CEMP and be done in
accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Liquid waste arising from construction operations will occur but will be limited to a finite
time period. The consequence of disposing this waste from site will be insignificant.
Overall, the environmental risk posed as a result of liquid waste management during the
construction phase will be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
It is expected that 8 m3/hour of wastewater will be generated intermittently during normal
process by the Chlor-Alkali Plant. Minimal amount of wastewater is also expected to be
generated via rainwater/stormwater runoff (approximately 12 liters/hour
discontinuously).
i.
Waste water generated at the plant will originate from various operations as
listed below:
electrolysis. Due to the recycling of the brine, the following components may
build-up;
o
As mentioned earlier, with the exception of blowdown water, the cooling water unit at the
proposed plant will not have any wastewater discharge.
ii.
iii.
Removal of brine filtration sludge by flushing with a weak HCl solution. The
acid will cause the precipitate to dissolve and the resultant solution will be
discharged with the liquid effluent to the onsite wastewater treatment plant;
and
Al Ghaith plans to install a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) onsite to treat the
wastewater generated. The treated effluent will be re-used in the plant as process water
and also as irrigation water for the green belt.
The effluent from each process/utility area will be collected in trench drains, from where
the effluent will be diverted to the collection pit and further to the onsite combined WWTP.
Al Ghaiths WWTP will have a 100 m 3 tank with dual-compartments for neutralization and
storage of the wastewater streams.
RO filtration; and
RO permeate recirculation.
The non-recyclable effluent with high Total Dissolved solids (TDS) and RO reject water
from the wastewater treatment plant will be disposed off in MIA Waste Management
Centre as per the current discharge practices from EAD.
It is expected that up to forty five (45) new staff will be required for the Chlor-Alkali Plant
(total for both shifts). This will result in generation of approximately less than 12 m 3/day
of sanitary water (based on 0.25 m 3/day sanitary wastewater generated per person and
the fact that a person will be within the Chlor-Alkali Plant for a few hours per day).
Liquid waste management on site will be managed in accordance with AD EHSMS CoP
16 Waste Management.
Liquid waste arising from operations will over regularly over a time period of 20 to 30
years. The consequence of disposing this waste from site will be insignificant. Overall,
the risk posed by effectively managed waste disposal will be moderate.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Frequent
Insignificant
Moderate
Decommissioning
Decommissioning of the Al Ghaith facilities could potentially create a significant quantity
of wastewater (if decontamination is required).
As mentioned above, a decommissioning plan will be prepared which will also include
and provide measures to manage and adequately dispose of wastewater generated
during decommissioning. The project will keep its existing wastewater treatment plant in
service and decommission it last, whereby the wastewater generated can be treated, thus
helping to potentially reduce the impacts.
Liquid waste management on site will be described in detail in the DEMP and be done in
accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Liquid waste arising from decommissioning operations will occur but will be limited to a
finite time period. The consequence of disposing this waste from site will be insignificant.
Overall, the environmental risk posed as a result of liquid waste management during the
construction phase will be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
5.3.2.3.
Insignificant
Low
Hazardous Waste
The Al Ghaith Plant is not expected to generate hazardous waste; in case it does
generate this, then this can be disposed off at the local Hazardous Waste Management
facility. Other facilities within MIA will also be generating wastes, but it is expected that
the MIA WMF (for regular and hazardous waste) will be able to meet the demands thus
helping mitigate the cumulative impacts arising due to waste generation.
Hazardous waste management on site will be described in detail during each project
phase and will be managed in accordance with AD EHSMS CoP 16 Waste Management.
Only designated, trained personnel will have access to the storage area. A spill response
plan will be in place and staff will be trained in handling hazardous waste and spill
response procedures. Spill kits will be easily accessible around the site during
construction.
Given the control measures in place the magnitude of impacts from hazardous waste is
considered to be local in nature. Overall, it is considered the impact as a result of solid
and liquid hazardous waste management during the construction, operation and
decommissioning phases will be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Possible
Insignificant
Low
Operation
Frequent
Construction
Likely
Solid Waste
Consequence
Insignificant
Phase
Insignificant
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Environmental Risk
5.3.3.1.
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Low
AD EHSMS CoP
16 Waste
Management
Environmental Risk
Consequence
Decommissioning
Insignificant
Phase
Probability
Impact
Description
Likely
Score
Moderate
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Construction
Insignificant
Liquid Waste
Likely
CEMP
include
liquid
management.
Colour to
coded
skips
andwaste
rubbish
bins around site.
Monitoring
andfor
treatment
of allstorage
effluentareas.
discharges to the
Clear signage
solid waste
marine environment to ensure that they meet ADWEAs
Training
of staff
in waste
management
permissible
discharge
limits
set for this procedures.
project.
Materialswater
ordered
a hydrotesting.
as needs basis.
Potable
usedonfor
Preparation
of arecycling
decommissioning
Reduce, reuse,
of wasteswaste
wheremanagement
possible.
plan.
Dedicated liquid waste storage area on site.
AD EHSMS CoP
16 Waste
Management
Operation
Environmental Risk
Consequence
Insignificant
Phase
Frequent
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Moderate
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Environmental Risk
Consequence
Decommissioning
Insignificant
Phase
Probability
Impact
Description
Likely
Score
Low
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Environmental Risk
Phase
Consequence
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Construction,
operations and
decommissioning
Minor
Hazardous
Waste
Possible
AD EHSMS CoP
16 Waste
Management
5.3.3.2.
Final solid, liquid and hazardous waste mitigation measures will be presented in the
CEMP. It is planned that all mitigation measures presented in Section 5.3.3.1 will be
implemented as per best practice outlined in EAD Code of Practice AD EHSMS CoP 16
Waste Management.
5.3.3.3.
The mitigation measures presented in Section 5.3.3.1 are designed to help address both
non-cumulative and cumulative impacts. No additional mitigation measures are planned
to deal with cumulative impacts specifically.
5.3.3.4.
Residual Impacts
Residual impacts associated with all waste management practises will be reduced to low
with the implementation of selected mitigation. Impacts will not be removed there will
continue to be the potential for accidental impacts from spills and leaks as well as the
ongoing impacts from solid waste and controlled effluent discharges. Therefore, scores
as presented in Section Error: Reference source not found remain applicable.
Waste type
Measurements
Solid waste
Daily
Liquid waste
Daily
Hazardous waste
Daily
Process water
discharge
Water quality testing against ADWEAs permissible discharge limits set for this
project
Monthly
Water quality testing against ADWEAs permissible discharge limits set for this
project
Monthly
Stormwater discharge
Water quality testing against ADWEAs permissible discharge limits set for this
project
Monthly
Water quality testing against ADWEAs permissible discharge limits set for this
project
Monthly
Frequency
Responsibility
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Shared Facilities
Environmental
Officer
5.4.
General Geology
The Arabian Peninsula has a variety of environments, including sand and rock desert,
sabkha, and mountains. The UAE occupies a north-east corner of the Arabian Peninsula,
and is characterised by the Hajar Mountains running parallel to the east coast and south
into Oman along the UAE boarder, vast sand desserts stretching from the plains by the
mountains south to the Empty Quarter bordering Saudi Arabia, and coastal Sabkha flats.
The coastline is also characterised by a number of offshore islands.
The Project site is located on to the south of Abu Dhabi Island. Bedrock in the area is
recorded to comprise interbedded variable beds of clastic and carbonate sandstones,
gypsiferous mudstone, siltstone, gypsum, limestones, and conglomerates which are
mostly Pleistocene or recent in age.
Superficial deposits in the area are generally considered to comprise predominantly sand
dunes, wind-blown (aeolian) deposits and evaporite deposits interbedded with marine
sands and silts. Sabkha deposits are also common along the coastline of the UAE and
are generally encountered in the typically flat foreshore zone, where groundwater levels
are at or near the surface. The regional geological setting of the Project site is indicated
in Figure XXX.
5.4.1.2.
Seismicity
EAD (2008) describes the main tectonic province in Abu Dhabi as a passive plate margin
(intracratonic) which is dominated by large, gentle folds of various shapes and size
related to differential regional subsidence or uplift along the deep-seated basement faults.
Abu Dhabi Emirate is located in the northeast Rub Al Khali basin. The boundaries of this
basin are controlled by faults of different ages. Several left-lateral wrench faults have
been identified. Around Abu Dhabi a NE-SW fold alignment is dominant (the Jarn
Yaphour trend) with a system of faults running parallel to this trend. On the Arabian
Shield of the UAE mainland maximum predicted magnitudes are 5.0 5.5 (Richter).
In general, the Arabian plate is considered to be relatively stable and there is a low risk of
a large earthquake occurring in the vicinity of the site. While it remains a low risk, it
should be noted that where very loose, water bearing silty fine soils are present on site
there is a potential risk of liquefaction under earthquake loading. Liquefaction of fine soils
can result in excessive settlement of structures founded above such material. The Al
Ghaith Chlor-Alkali Plant site area comprises an upfilled platform of imported material.
Figure 1-13
Figure 1-14
5.4.1.3.
The Project site borders a tidal channel and has a low gradient coastal profile. According
to EAD (2008) historically the landscape consisted of wide and extensive intertidal
cyanobacterial mats and evaporative flats. The tidal flat sediments and evaporites are
flanked by stranded high energy beach ridges and reworked late Holocene Aeolian and
outwash fans. The Holocene sediments accumulate on Neogene sedimentary rocks
consisting of a sequence of marls, sandstones, limestones and evaporates. Banked up
against the Neogene rocks and covering them are Quaternary carbonates. The
sedimentary rocks were deposited during the last major glacial eustatic low stand in the
Arabian Gulf. These largely Aeolian sands line the inner margins of the present day salt
flats or sabkhas, and their surface often lies close to the present water table. They
underlie much of the Holocene carbonate/evaporate complex.
Since development of the MIA the site has been up-filled and levelled which has changed
the nature of the site. The original coastal sabkha characteristics can generally be
observed after drilling below two meters below ground level. The up-fill is likely to have
been a mix of dredge spoil and imported soil from nearby borrow pits, consisting of
carbonaceous materials and silicates. The site is no longer influenced by tidal inundation.
It will however experience occasional heavy rainfall from storm events. Due to its close
proximity to the channel the water table will largely mirror the average seawater level.
Water levels are therefore likely to be two or three meters below ground level and
experience some mixing with the seawater.
Due to the high salinity of the groundwater it is not used for any potable, irrigation or
industrial use. It is not known whether there are any monitoring wells on site. The site
has been used for general material storage up until now and there is no known
contamination of soil or groundwater on site.
5.4.2.1.
Construction
During construction, there is a risk of spills of fuel and oil from construction equipment
and temporary storage tanks. Other substances, such as paints, coating and cleaning
products may be used on site, and there is a potential of spills onto the ground, resulting
in the contamination of soil and groundwater. These potential impacts should be
managed through the use of environmental management plan for the construction phase
(CEMP). Storage and disposal areas should be clearly segregated and designed to
prevent spills from reaching the ground.
Other potential impacts relate to construction phase wastewater. The operation and
maintenance of temporary washing areas and toilets should be well managed to prevent
the accidental discharge of wastewater onto the ground. The construction wastewater
will be collected in a concrete-lined pit, neutralized, filtered and will be reused.
Similar potential impacts and management measures apply for the commissioning and
start-up phases. In addition, wastewater will be generated due to hydrotesting, cleaning,
boil-out and chemical washing of lines, vessels and tanks. A commissioning phase
management plan should be developed and followed to prevent the discharge of any
effluents and chemicals to the ground.
It is considered that the construction impacts relating to soil contamination will be
restricted to the site and immediate surrounding areas. The impacts are considered to be
temporary (as they will occur during the construction period of the project only) and
reversible as long as appropriate clean up operations are carried out allowing excavation
and removal of contaminated soils. The impacts could potentially be cumulative if
contamination of soils occurs associated with the construction of plant on adjacent
industrial facilities. Overall the environmental impact associated with soil contamination
during construction is low risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Rare
Minor
Low
Operation
The solvents and other chemicals proposed to be used in the process pose a risk of
contamination of the soil and groundwater if they are not handled and stored cautiously.
Moreover, spills of HCl and sodium hypochlorite might release large amount of acid
fumes and chlorine gas, respectively.
Any impacts are considered to be reversible through appropriate remediation works. The
impacts could potentially be cumulative if contamination of soils occurs associated with
the operation of the adjacent plant. Overall the environmental risk associated with soil
and groundwater contamination during operation is moderate.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Minor
Moderate
Decommissioning
During decommissioning of the plant there will be the potential for contamination of site
soils and groundwater as a result of the planned activities of dismantling and demolition
of plant structures and equipment. Details of the decommissioning plan are not available
at the time of writing, therefore it is assumed that decommissioning will comprise the
removal of all site structures above ground level. Contamination of soil and groundwater
could potentially occur as a result of: spillage of residual fluids, oils and chemicals within
plant equipment during dismantling; spills and leaks of waste materials stored on site;
inappropriate handling of waste materials.
A decommissioning phase management plan should be developed and followed to
prevent the discharge of any effluents and chemicals to the ground.
It is considered that the decommissioning impacts relating to soil contamination will be
restricted to the site and immediate surrounding areas. The impacts are considered to be
temporary (as they will occur during the period of decommissioning only) and reversible
as long as appropriate clean up operations are carried out allowing excavation and
removal of contaminated soils and groundwater. The impacts could potentially be
cumulative if contamination occurs on adjacent industrial facilities at the during the same
period of decommissioning. Overall the environmental impact associated with soil
contamination during construction is low risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Rare
Minor
Low
Construction
Consequence
Contamination of Soil
and Groundwater
Minor
Phase
Probability
Impact Description
Rare
Score
Significance
Low
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
EHSMS CoP 12
Water Quality and
CoP 13 - Land
Management
version 1.2 July
2009
-
Phase
Consequence
Impact Description
Probability
Score
Significance
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Minor
Operation
Likely
Moderate
EHSMS CoP 12
Water Quality and
CoP 13 - Land
Management
version 1.2 July
2009
-
Decommissioning
Consequence
Minor
Phase
Rare
Impact Description
Probability
Score
Significance
Low
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
EHSMS CoP 12
Water Quality and
CoP 13 - Land
Management
version 1.2 July
2009
-
5.4.3.2.
14. Construction activities will not be scheduled when there is a significant potential
for rainfall and torrential run offs.
15. Adequate dust suppression, erosion and sedimentation controls will be
established as part of the CEMP, and appropriate soil conservation measures
taken including limiting the disturbed area.
16. Wherever possible use will be made of approved recycling facilities within the
UAE.
17. Temporary sewage units will be regularly inspected, maintained and emptied by
authorised waste management contractors.
18. All contaminated wastewater will be treated to within appropriate discharge limits
prior to disposal.
19. Treated sanitary wastewater will be treated to within appropriate discharge limits
prior to release to soakaways.
These measures when followed properly as part of a rigorous CEMP are considered
appropriate to mitigate against the potential for soil and groundwater contamination.
Operation
During operation of the plant there will be a potential for soil and groundwater
contamination from planned activities. Mitigation measures considered to be appropriate
for this project comprise the following:
1. EPC contractor to develop OEMP including an environmental monitoring plan.
2. Appropriate protocols will be established for the transfer and disposal of
contaminated fuel, oil and soil in accordance with Municipality requirements in the
Waste Management Plan.
3. Fuel, oil and chemical storage facilities to include 110% secondary containment.
4. Refuelling & maintenance to be carried out at designated sealed hardstanding
area/s with appropriate spill clean up and containment facilities.
5. If any inadvertent leakage or spillage of hydrocarbons occurs, the operator will
implement spill response measures to contain and excavate any contaminated
soil present.
6. Chemical Management, Waste Management, Emergency and Spill Response
plans will be established for the site.
7. All contaminated wastewater will be treated to within appropriate discharge limits
prior to disposal.
8. Routine and regular documented inspections of the
chemical/oil/fuel storage facilities and waste storage areas.
plant
including
5.5.
Marine Ecology
5.6.
Terrestrial Ecology
Construction
Information gathered during the site walkover indicated that the ecological diversity and
abundance is very low. The site is considered to be of little conservation interest. This is
likely due to the reclaimed and levelled nature of the site.
In all likelihood the flora and fauna associated with the site will be lost during construction
activities. Removal of terrestrial habitats will be permanent and irreversible within the
footprint of the plant and transportation routes for the duration of the construction phase
of the Project and also for the operational phase. Habitat removal on the site will,
however, be of rare probability and insignificant consequence due to the low diversity and
abundance of common species on site. Overall, the environmental impact associated
with this removal of habitat is considered of low environmental risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Rare
Insignificant
Low
Operation
The footprint of the works established during the construction phase will remain during
the operational phase. Removal of terrestrial habitats will be permanent and irreversible
for the duration of the operational phase of the Project. Should any future maintenance
or extensions be planned for the site, potential for the removal of additional habitats
should be assessed at this time. Habitat removal on the site will, however, be of rare
probability and insignificant consequence due to the low diversity and abundance of
common species on site. Overall, the environmental impact associated with this removal
of habitat is considered of low environmental risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Rare
Insignificant
Low
Decommissioning
The footprint of the works established during the construction and operation phases will
be removed during the decommissioning phase.
At this point there is no
decommissioning plan in place and it is not known if the site shall be used for another
purpose or returned, in so far as is possible, to its original state. As shown by the
evidence of ecological succession on the site since previous filling/levelling activities, it is
reasonable to assume that species recolonisation will occur if the site is cleared and
restored. Therefore, assuming this case, the impacts will be temporary and reversible.
Overall, the environmental impact associated with this activity is considered of low
environmental risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Rare
Insignificant
Low
Consequence
Environmental
Risk
Construction
Insignificant
Loss of habitat /
Disturbance to
Flora and Fauna
Phase
Rare
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Insignificant
Rare
Operation
Insignificant
Rare
Al Ghaith Industries
Decommissioning
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
5.6.3.2.
Loss of Habitat
Construction
The impact of loss / disturbance will be realised during the construction phase. As such:
1. Clearing of vegetation will be confined to that necessary for the establishment of
the plant.
Areas for clearance will be established with the EPC Site
Environmental Manager before works.
2. Management strategies will be implemented to protect any remaining native
vegetation communities by controlling the occurrence and spread of weeds and
minimising the impact of soil erosion/sedimentation. This will include general
good housekeeping on site and assessment during the daily site inspection by
the EPC Site Environmental Manager.
These measures will not fully mitigate the loss of the present habitats as this impact is
unavoidable due to the footprint of the plant facilities. These measures will, however,
reduce the impact from loss of habitat as far as possible.
Operation
No specific measures have been identified to mitigate the loss of native habitat on site.
However:
1. Planting vegetation composed of local species, preferably coastal, within the
available space will provide green areas. Such landscaping within the plant
fence line will provide some habitat/shelter for species including insects and birds
on site, and though not directly mitigating for the impact, will provide areas of
some limited value. Such areas would also be visually appealing, particularly if
instated in administration or office areas. Basic landscaped areas also cost
relatively little to instate and maintain.
It should be noted that the impact of habitat loss will be realised during the construction
phase and that the operational phase will not further increase this impact. In addition,
landscaping mitigation will only provide alternate habitat and limited compensation and
will not provide any habitat recreation.
Responsibility for landscaping during the operational phase will be with the Al Ghaith
Plant Environmental Manager. This activity will be a continual activity, likely falling within
the plant maintenance schedule.
Decommissioning
A decommissioning strategy has not yet been developed for this project. Potential
mitigation measures as identified within Section Error: Reference source not found will be
considered further prior to the decommissioning phase and selected mitigation measures,
Residual Impacts
Loss of Habitat
With the implementation of the mitigation as selected in Section 5.9.3.2, the impact will
remain low as loss of habitat is unavoidable. Scores as identified in Section 5.9.2 remain
applicable.
Disturbance to Flora and Fauna
No potential mitigation measures have been identified for any project phase due to the
fact the site contains a low density and abundance of species and is of low conservation
interest. As such, the scores as attributed in Section 5.9.2 remain, and the overall impact
on flora and fauna is still considered to be low.
5.7.
Noise
Construction
Operation of light and heavy vehicles and construction equipment (such as those for
piling) on site will lead to generation of noise in their vicinity. However, due to the
transient nature of these construction works as well as the existing industrial nature of the
wider area in which the Project is located, the overall incremental increase in noise levels
due to these activities is likely to be minor.
Keeping the above in view, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to noise
levels in the Project area for this aspect due to construction activities is of low
significance.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
It is envisaged that during operation of the Chloro-Alkali plant, only light vehicles will
operate within the confines of the plant, with heavy vehicles or temporary constructionrelated equipment employed very rarely for certain maintenance work, as needed. This
coupled with the transient and infrequent nature of light vehicular traffic and constructionrelated equipment operation render the overall incremental increase in noise levels due to
these activities as minor.
Keeping the above in view, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to noise
levels in the Project area for this aspect due to operation activities is of low significance.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Decommissioning
Similar to the Project construction phase, operation of light and heavy vehicles and
construction equipment on site during decommissioning and demolition works will lead to
generation of noise in their vicinity. However, due to the transient nature of these
activities as well as the existing industrial nature of the wider area in which the Project is
located, the overall incremental increase in noise levels due to these activities is likely to
be minor.
Keeping the above in view, it is considered that the overall environmental impact to noise
levels in the Project area for this aspect due to decommissioning activities is of low
significance.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Frequent
Insignificant
Moderate
Construction
Consequence
Insignificant
Emissions from
Operation of
Vehicles and
Temporary
Equipment
Phase
Likely
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Environmental
Risk
Low
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
EAD Noise
Allowable Limits
Phase
Consequence
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Environmental
Risk
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Insignificant
Operation
Likely
Construction
Insignificant
Decommissioning
Likely
Low
No impact
Not applicable
EAD Noise
Allowable Limits
Phase
Consequence
Impact
Description
Probability
Score
Environmental
Risk
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Emissions from
Operation of
Chlor-Alkali Plant
Al Ghaith Industries
Moderate
Decommissioning
Insignificant
Operation
Frequent
No impact
Not applicable
5.7.3.2.
Upon review of the potential mitigation measures in Section 5.7.3.1, appropriate and
feasible measures will be selected for enforcement on site and their implementation
frequency decided. Details on the suggested mitigation measures are provided
hereunder.
Emissions from Operation of Vehicles and Temporary Equipment
Construction
The EPC Site Environmental Manager will enforce speed restrictions on site traffic and
ensure that equipment used on an intermittent basis (such as bulldozers or idling cars)
will be shut down or throttled down to a minimum to cut down on unnecessary noise
emissions. Moreover, any known noisy activities such as piling will be scheduled such
that they occur during daylight hours in order to minimise potential disturbance to humans
as well as fauna during the night time when they are more sensitive to changes in noise
levels.
The EPC Site Environmental Manager will also ensure that all known noisy construction
equipment (such as hand tools or air compressors) have acoustic covers installed on their
noisy parts (e.g. engines), which are kept closed at all times.
The EPC Maintenance Manager will also ensure that all construction machinery and
vehicles operational on site are maintained according to a set schedule as per the
manufacturers specifications so that they are in good working condition at all times and
consequently non-design noise emissions are minimised.
Operation
Same as for the Construction phase above.
Decommissioning
Same as for the Construction phase above.
Emissions from Operation of Chlor-Alkali Plant
Construction
Not applicable.
Operation
Since the potential mitigation measures concern the design of the plant facilities, the EPC
Contractor in coordination with the Project Proponent will select the appropriate mitigation
measures to be implemented in order to reduce noise emissions from operation of the
plant. These measures are detailed hereunder.
Plant equipment will be selected and installed that has been designed to adhere to the
Project noise philosophy as well as local regulations to minimise the potential for
exceedance of noise limits during normal operation of the plant.
The Chlor-Alkali Plant Operations Manager also will ensure that all plant equipment are
regularly maintained to manufacturer specifications in order to reduce the potential for
non-design performance of the equipment that can result in higher noise emissions from
equipments.
It is recommended that low noise valves are used where practicable to minimise noise
emissions during emergency situations and to protect any worker at a position close to
these valves.
Decommissioning
Not applicable.
5.7.3.3. Mitigation Measures to Address Cumulative Impacts
The cumulative impacts identified are those that will impact ambient air quality from the
combined operation of the current Project (Construction, Operation and Decommissioning
phases) and the existing noise emissions sources in the wider area where the Project is
located.
With respect to the cumulative impacts identified for all construction phase aspects, these
will be transient in nature since they will exist only for the time the construction activities
are in progress, therefore as long as the selected mitigation measures for these aspects
detailed in Section 5.7.3.31 are adhered to, no additional mitigation measures are
required to address their cumulative impact.
With respect to the cumulative impacts identified for all operation phase aspects, on the
current Project the noise emissions from operation of the Chlor-Alkali plant are the only
ones that can be controlled and minimised by implementing the selected mitigation
measures for these aspects detailed in Section 5.7.3.31. Assuming that the noise
emissions contributing facilities above are complying with the relevant mitigation
measures addressing their operational emissions, it is envisaged that no additional
mitigation measures are required to address the cumulative impact of all the facilities
including the Al Ghaith Chlor-Alkali Plant.
5.7.3.4. Residual Impacts
After application of the mitigation measures discussed in Section 5.7.3.2, the residual
impact for all the aspects during all three Project phases will remain unchanged from the
assessments provided in Section Error: Reference source not found.
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Monthly
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Daily
Operation
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Project Phase
Decommissioning
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Daily
Daily
Monthly
Al Ghaith
Operations
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Daily
Daily
Al Ghaith Industries
Reporting
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Responsibility
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Daily
Al Ghaith
Environmental
Manager
Monthly
Al Ghaith
Operations
Manager
Monitoring Activity
Frequency
Responsibility
Reporting
Construction
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Once
EPC Engineering
Contractor
Plant Description
Documentation
As per manufacturer
specifications, Plant
Maintenance Philosophy
Al Ghaith Operations
Manager
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Operation
Decommissioning
Monitoring programs suggested in Sections Error: Reference source not found will
minimise the impact as far as considered practical, with commitment to these measures
provided in Section 7 Statement of Commitments of the PEHSR. These measures will
also be reflected in the EPC Contractors Project Construction Environmental
Management Plan (CEMP) and the Al Ghaiths Operations Environmental Management
Plan (OEMP). Compliance monitoring carried out as part of implementation of the aforementioned documentation (e.g. periodic inspections, audits) will assess for compliance of
monitoring with the specified mitigation measures.
5.7.4.2. Monitoring Program for Cumulative Impacts
As stated in Section 5.7.3.3, since the cumulative impacts from construction of the plant
will be transient and controlled by implementation of the selected mitigation measures
detailed in Section 5.7.3.2, no additional monitoring program is required to address them
other than the Project monitoring mentioned in Section Error: Reference source not
found. The same applies to the decommissioning stage of the Project.
5.7.4.3. Monitoring Program for Residual Impacts
As stated in Section 5.7.3.4, since no residual impacts have been identified after
application of the selected mitigation measures and their associated monitoring detailed
in Section Error: Reference source not found, no such additional monitoring is required.
5.8.
Traffic
The impact associated with additional traffic on the roads around ICAD-1, MIA and the
wider emirate of Abu Dhabi introduced by the construction of the Chlor-Alkali Plant will not
be measureable and as such is deemed to be an insignificant factor in this PEHSR. As
such, the environmental impact resulting from traffic will not be considered.
5.9.
Socio-Economic
Figure 5-1-15 Total population of each UAE Emirate and their respective male to
female ratios in 2005 (United Arab Emirates Ministry of Economy, 2006)
Age Distribution
The age structure of the population in the UAE is detailed in Figure 5- 1 -16. The peak
population within the UAE as a whole lies within the 25 to 40 age range, with a peak at
30-34 years. The population is weighted heavily in favour of expatriate men between the
ages of 20 to 55 (United Arab Emirates Ministry of Economy, 2006).
Figure 5-1-16 UAE population by age group (United Arab Emirates Ministry of Economy, 2006)
Economy
The UAE economy has prospered in recent years with the country ranked 56th out of 180
countries worldwide in its contribution to the global GDP in 2007. Within the GCC, the
UAE ranked second to Saudi Arabia in its contribution according to the classification of
the International Monetary Fund in 2007 (Abu Dhabi Economic and Social Report, 2008).
5.9.1.2.
Population
Total estimated residential population of Musaffah is approximately 151,000 (Municipality
of Abu Dhabi City Website, 2009). The detailed demographics of the residential
population and total worker population in MIA are not available in public domain.
On the east of MIA, lies a residential area, which is primarily intended for accommodation
of workers employed in MIA. In addition, the residing population mostly comprises of
migrant male expatriate workers, typical of the general demographic of the MIA, with few
UAE nationals.
Age Distribution
The predominant male bias is expected to be even more pronounced in this area since
the majority of the population are male expatriates, working predominately on projects of
an industrial nature. No age structure data is available for the Musaffah Area however
the age structure is considered to be typical of the UAE, in favour of expatriate men
between the ages of 20 to 55.
Nearby Sensitive Receptors
Bul Syayeef Marine Protected Area (MPA) lies to the west of MIA, separated by an
approximately 500 m wide navigational channel. Bul Syayeef was declared as a Marine
Protected Area by EAD in 2007.
5.9.1.3.
Land Use
The land use around the site consists of heavy industries and logistics, with XXX to the
east, XXX to the west and proposed XXX plant to the south. A naval school lies 1 km to
the southeast of the site on the Musaffah South Channels southern bank.
Economic Impacts
The AED XXX million / billion project will help relieve the increasing demands for caustic
and chlorine within the Emirate. The long term economic benefits both to the national,
regional and local community will be significant.
Population
No additional manpower shall be contracted. Local labour in Musaffah shall be utilized
for this development.
Construction
There are no requirements to displace local residents through this project as the site is
designated for industrial purposes. There is very little public activity around the site.
Equipment and materials needed for the construction of the plant will be transported
along existing roads to the site.
In general, impacts on land use during construction are expected to be low as
development is in accordance with regional plans and in an area designated for such
works.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
The Chlor-Alkali plant will operate within the boundaries of the MIA / ICAD-1, and as such
there is considered to be no impact on land use of the area. There is likely to be an
insignificant increase in environmental impact of the plant through air. Air quality impacts
are unlikely to affect the general community due to low volume of emissions and
dispersion. The impacts from the operation on the land use and community are
anticipated to be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Decommissioning
The operational life cycle of the Chlor-Alkali Plant is likely to be 20 years or more.
Typically Chlor-alkali plants are upgraded and retrofitted over time to extend their
operational life cycle and meet ever more stringent environmental guidelines. Even when
the plant does become redundant it is likely the site will still be used for industrial
purposes due to the land zoning. So it is unlikely that full decommissioning and
restoration of the site will be required for many years. If decommissioning is eventually
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
5.9.2.2.
Social Impacts
Construction
During construction the project will require up to an estimated 100 workers on site. Most
workers will be expatriate male labourers who will most likely be accommodated in worker
camps within MIA. The influx will not change the demographic gender and ethnic
dynamics of the population.
The impacts from the construction on the social aspects are anticipated to be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
During operation the impacts on employment are less significant than during construction.
However, those who are employed will have longer term job security and are more likely
to bring their family and integrate in the community. They will require a higher standard of
housing and facilities such as shops, entertainment, a school, and a hospital. They are
also more likely to interact with the local Emiratis. It is estimated that the operational
workforce will be around 100 people. Including families the number of people that will be
added to the community is significant and is likely to help develop the area.
The impacts from plant operation on the social aspects are anticipated to be low.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Decommissioning
During decommissioning the number of workers on site will increase. There may be a
short term benefit to the community through employment opportunities. But once the
plant is dissembled and removed the social benefits will be gone. The roughly 100
people working on-site permanently will no longer be required. So unless the land can be
used for some other purpose which helps employee local people the social impacts will
be negative. It is entirely likely that when the Chlor-Alkali Plant is decommissioned in the
future a new plant may take its place or other industry will move in. Alternatively in 20
years time if the population of the area continues to expand this land with ocean views
may become valuable for residential purposes as has happened in many other parts of
the world.
5.9.2.3.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Economic Impacts
Construction
The total estimated expenditure for construction and operation of the project is USD xxxx
mil.. A large proportion of this expense will be early on in the construction phase when
the major components will be purchased and up to approximately XXX workers will be on
site. While the major system units will be imported other construction materials such as
concrete and steel rebar will be sourced locally.
While there is likely to be a beneficial multiplier effect from the money spent on this
project, which will spread through the economy, it may not be as high as in other places
as expatriate workers typically save a high proportion of their salaries to send home. As
they stay in fully catered camps they are not likely to spend large sums of money in the
local shops. Workers are also not taxed on their incomes. Therefore a large proportion
of money may move offshore. However, for every direct job created by the project there
will be supporting indirect jobs created. A project like this is only likely to benefit the
economy.
There is potential for inflationary pressure as a result of this project due to the shortage of
certain building materials locally and already strong demand for these products. The
added people involved in the project will also increase demand for foodstuffs and other
supplies. However, the overall impacts are not likely be significant or long term as once
operational the numbers of people on site will be relatively minor.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Operation
The economic benefits of the new plant are large. Abu Dhabi is growing at a fast rate in
terms of population and new developments. This has put a significant strain on the
energy infrastructure of the Emirate. Without the development of new industry the
Emirates growth would slow. The construction of the Chlor-Alkali Plant is important to
the future of Abu Dhabi, and the oil and gas industry in particular. As such, the operation
of the plant is of major positive impact, and therefore low risk.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Decommissioning
Decommissioning will have obvious negative impacts on the economy. Approximately 50
people will be out of work and the Chlor-alkali production will no longer be available which
will increase the overall caustic and chlorine for consumers in Abu Dhabi. While there
may be some employment opportunities during the decommissioning process these will
be short term.
Probability
Consequence
Risk
Likely
Minor
Moderate
Consequence
Insignificant
Low
Insignificant
Low
Operation
Likely
Decommissioning
Construction
Likely
Social
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
No mitigation identified
Insignificant
Construction
Environmental
Risk
Low
Insignificant
Land Use
Probability
Phase
Likely
Impact Description
Likely
Score
Low
No mitigation identified
Probability
Consequence
Likely
Insignificant
Low
Insignificant
Low
Insignificant
Phase
Likely
Impact Description
Likely
Score
Low
Environmental
Risk
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Decommissioning
Construction
Operation
Likely
Economic
Insignificant
Operation
Provide adequate assistance and facilities to allow
permanent workers to integrate in the local
community.
No mitigation identified
Low
No mitigation identified
Consequence
Minor
Phase
Probability
Impact Description
Likely
Score
Environmental
Risk
Applicable
Environmental
Standard / Limits
Potential Mitigation
Decommissioning
Moderate
5.9.3.2.
As the socio-economic benefits of the project are primarily beneficial mitigation measures
have not been identified for most aspects of the project. The only mitigation measure that
has been selected as an ultimate requirement of the project is:
1. A decommissioning plan for the site is produced. The decommissioning plan will
be the responsibility of the Operations Manager prior to any decommissioning
activities commencing and will need to consider issues such as waste handling
and disposal, site investigations, and restoration of the site. This plan will need
to be approved through EAD.
Note that other environmental mitigation measures including traffic management that will
benefit the community are addressed in separate sections.
5.9.3.3.
Residual Impacts
As only one mitigation measure has been selected, and this is a mandatory requirement
of the project, the residual impacts will remain unchanged. They are all considered Low
with the exception of the operational impacts on the social and economic factors, which
remain of major positive benefit.
No monitoring program is considered necessary at this stage of the Project. When the
site is eventually decommissioned post closure monitoring is recommended to ensure the
fitness of the land for the intended future use. This shall be determined within the
decommissioning plan.
5.9.4.2.
Emissions
from
operation of
fuel
consuming
vehicles
and
equipment
Phase
Signific
ance
Low
Air Quality
Impact
Construction
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Low
Combustion
and Fugitive
Emissions
from
Operation of
AL GHAITH
Plant
No Impact
Low
Operation
Emissions
from
operation of
fuel
consuming
vehicles
and
equipment
Air Quality
Emissions
from
operation of
fuel
consuming
vehicles
and
equipment
Decommissioning
Signific
ance
Construction
Phase
Air Quality
Impact
Air Quality
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Operations Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Operations Manager
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Low
Combustion
and Fugitive
Emissions
from
Operation of
AL GHAITH
Plant
Operations
Air Quality
EPC Engineering
Contractor
Maintenance of plant equipment as per
manufacturer specifications and Plant
Maintenance Philosophy to be documented
in Plant Maintenance Checklist
No Impact
Combustion
and Fugitive
Emissions
from
Operation of
AL GHAITH
Plant
Decommissioning
Air Quality
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Al Ghaith Plant
Operations Manager
(Third Party
Specialist if
required)
Not applicable.
Emission of
Greenhouse
Gasses
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Impact
Construction
Air Quality
Receptor
Responsible Party
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Low
Emission of
Greenhouse
Gasses
Decommissioning
Air Quality
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Low
Emissions
from
accidental
events
Construction
Air Quality
Responsible Party
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Emissions
from
accidental
events
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Impact
Operation
Air Quality
Receptor
All
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Low
Decommissioning
Cumulative
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Air Quality
Emissions
from
accidental
events
Air Quality
Responsible Party
Residual
Phase
Signific
ance
Impact
All
Air Quality
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Solid Waste
Construction
Waste Management
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Solid Waste
Operation
Waste Management
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Site Environmental
Manager
(Contractor)
Solid Waste
Decommissioning
Waste Management
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Liquid
Waste
Moderate
Waste Management
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Liquid
Waste
Critical
Waste Management
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Liquid
Waste
Decommissioning
Waste Management
Site Environmental
Manager
(Contractor)
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Hazardous
Waste
Moderate
Waste Management
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Hazardous
Waste
Moderate
Waste Management
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Site Environmental
Manager
(Contractor)
Hazardous
Waste
Decommissioning
Waste Management
No monitoring identified.
No monitoring identified.
Residual
impact
Cumulative
Impact
Disturbance
to site soils
Low
Monitoring
No mitigation identified.
Disturbance
to site soils
Low
Mitigation
All Phases
Signific
ance
All Phases
Phase
Construction
Impact
Operation
Waste
Waste
Management Management
Receptor
No mitigation identified.
Responsible Party
Disturbance
to site soils
Phase
Signific
ance
Low
Impact
Decommissioning
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Contaminati
on of soil
Moderate
Operation
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Contaminati
on of soil
Phase
Signific
ance
Moderate
Impact
Decommissioning
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Site Environmental
Manager
(Contractor)
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Contaminati
on of
shallow
groundwate
r
Moderate
Operation
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Residual
Impacts
Signific
ance
Cumulative
Impact
Phase
All
Impact
All
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Low
Loss of
habitat
within Al
Ghaith
project site
Construction
Terrestrial Ecology
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Low
Loss of
habitat
within
Chlor-Alkali
project site
Operation
Terrestrial Ecology
No monitoring identified.
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
No monitoring identified.
Site Environmental
Manager
(Contractor)
Low
Loss of
habitat
within
Chlor-Alkali
project site
Decommissioning
Terrestrial Ecology
Low
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Low
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Low
Residual
impact.
Monitoring
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Cumulative
impact.
Mitigation
No monitoring identified.
Construction
Disturbance
to flora and
fauna within
Chlor-Alkali
Project site
All
Operation
Disturbance
to flora and
fauna within
Chlor-Alkali
Project site
All
Decommissioning
Terrestrial
Ecology
Disturbance
to flora and
fauna within
Chlor-Alkali
Project site
Terrestrial
Ecology
Signific
ance
Terrestrial Ecology
Phase
Terrestrial
Ecology
Impact
Terrestrial
Ecology
Receptor
Responsible Party
Emissions
from
operation of
vehicles
and
temporary
equipment
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Impact
Construction
Noise
Receptor
Low
Emissions
from
operation of
vehicles
and
temporary
equipment
Operation
Noise
Responsible Party
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Noise
Emissions
from
operation of
vehicles
and
temporary
equipment
Decommissioning
Noise
Emissions
from
operation of
Chlor-Alkali
Plant
Construction
Mitigation
Monitoring
Low
Signific
ance
Impact
No Impact
Phase
Receptor
Not applicable.
Not applicable
Responsible Party
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
Al Ghaith Plant
Operations Manager
Moderate
Emissions
from
operation of
Chlor-Alkali
Plant
Operation
Noise
No Impact
Emissions
from
operation of
Al Ghaith
Plant
Decommissioning
Noise
Not applicable.
Note applicable.
Emissions
from
abnormal
events
Phase
Signific
ance
Low
Impact
Construction
Noise
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Responsible Party
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
Emissions
from
abnormal
events
Phase
Signific
ance
Low
Impact
Operation
Noise
Receptor
Mitigation
Monitoring
Low
Emissions
from
abnormal
events
Decommissioning
Noise
Responsible Party
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
EPC Site
Environmental
Manager
No monitoring identified.
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
No monitoring identified
Land used
and
community
impacts
Low
Residual
impact
No mitigation identified.
Land used
and
community
impacts
Low
All
All
Cumulative
impact
Construction
Monitoring
Operation
Mitigation
Noise
Signific
ance
Noise
Phase
Socioeconomic
Impact
Socioeconomic
Receptor
Responsible Party
Receptor
Impact
Phase
Signific
ance
Mitigation
Monitoring
Low
Land used
and
community
impacts
Decommissioning
Socio-economic
Responsible Party
Al Ghaith Plant
Environmental
Manager
Decommissioning
Low
Operation
Social
impact
No monitoring identified.
Major
Construction
Socioeconomic
Social
impact
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Low
Socioeconomic
Social
impact
Socio-economic
Decommissioni
ng
All
Residual
impact
All
Socio- Socio-economic
economic
Socioeconomic
Cumulative
impact
Low
Operation
Economic
impact
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Major
Construction
Socioeconomic
Economic
impact
Monitoring
No mitigation identified.
No monitoring identified.
Low
Socioeconomic
Economic
impact
Mitigation
Signific
ance
Impact
Phase
Receptor
Responsible Party
Failure of materials
Failure of equipment
Examples of accidental environmental impacts include (but are not limited to) the
following:
Spills
Leaks
Uncontrolled discharge
Uncontrolled emissions
Fire
Explosion
Process blow-downs
Within the EHSMS, AD EHSMS CoP05 Risk Management (v1.2 July 2009) presents the
methodology for the environmental assessment of accidental impacts.
The
environmental consequence and probability of an accidental impact is used to determine
the level of Risk which may result from the associated project activity. Each
environmental impact is ranked to yield both a consequence and probability score. This
is achieved through the use of prescriptive tables which provide a definition for each
assigned rank (see Table 5 -11 and Table 5 -12).
Environmental consequence of project interactions are ranked between 1 (insignificant
consequences) and 5 (catastrophic consequences), while probability of occurrence is
also ranked from 1 (rare) through to 5 (frequent). Once scores for consequence and
probability have been established, they are then used to determine the Risk of the
environmental impact through the use of a matrix.
The Risk Categories matrix determines significance through the product of the
environmental consequence of the interaction and the probability of the action occurring,
and is expressed as Risk = probability x consequence. This Risk is expressed as a
number between 1 and 25, with:
The lower half of the matrix provides details on the action which must be taken for
environmental impacts defined within these categories. If a risk is identified as extreme,
the activity/industry can not proceed in its current form as the risk is too high. Other
required actions include design or procedure modifications such as remedial planning and
further action subject to the environmental assessment. The Matrix is shown in Figure 1
-17.
Section 5.11.1 presents the Environmental Hazard and Effects Register (EHER).
Accidental environmental impacts for the Al Ghaith Project are identified and assessed for
the magnitude of the potential environmental risk within the EHER.
Table 5-11
Score
1.
Insignificant
Consequence
Potential Environmental Impact and Potential Incident Consequence Rating from AD EHSMS CoP05
Land-based Ecosystem
Insignificant environmental
impact. Occasional damage by
erosion, or of flora and fauna.
Some disruption to flora or
fauna habitats
Aquatic Ecosystem
2.
Minor
Consequence
Score
3.
4.
Moderate
Consequence
Major
Consequence
Land-based Ecosystem
Aquatic Ecosystem
Significant changes in
flora/fauna populations and
habitat. Disruption to, or some
death of, rare flora or fauna, but
not resulting in eradication of
endangered species. Nonpersistent but possibly
widespread damage to land;
damage that can be remediated
without long-term loss; localised
persistent damage; or
significant temporary damage
(<1 year) to ecosystem.
Moderate damage to
structures / items of cultural
significance, or significant
infringement of cultural values /
sacred locations.
5.
Catastrophic
Consequence
Catastrophic environmental
impact due to uncontained
release, fire or explosion with
detrimental effect. Outside
assistance required.
Extensive chronic discharge of
persistent hazardous pollutant.
Results in the generation of
significant quantities of
intractable wastes
Table 5-12
Description
Likely Frequency
Probability
Frequent
Often
Likely
Possible
Rare
Probability
(from Table 5 -12)
Insignificant (1)
Minor (2)
Moderate (3)
Major (4)
Catastrophic (5)
Rare (1)
Possible (2)
10
Likely (3)
12
15
Often (4)
12
16
20
10
15
20
25
15 25
Extreme Risk
8 12
High Risk
Activity should be modified to include remedial planning and action and be subject to
detailed EHS Assessment
46
Moderate Risk
13
Low Risk
Figure 1-17
The level of environmental risk associated with each identified hazard (accidental
event); and
Control and recovery measures that will be implemented to minimise risk and
occurrence of each hazard (accidental event).
Accidental environmental risks associated with the Al Ghaith Project are qualitatively
screened using the AD EHSMS CoP05 methodology (as described in the previous
section) to determine the risk consequences.
Table and Error: Reference source not found present the EHER for the Construction and
Operational phases of the Al Ghaith project respectively. Decommissioning has not been
included within this section specifically as no information is available at this point in the
schedule to confirm the methodologies or equipment which will be utilised at this point, or
to document the scale of the decommissioning activities. It is therefore assumed that
when the Chlor-Alkali Plant has reached the end of its operational life, the site will be
returned, in so far as is possible, to its pre-Chlor-Alkali construction state. As such, it is
also assumed that any decommissioning activities that take place will mirror the activities
of the construction stage, and therefore the EHER as developed for the construction
phase (see Table ) can be used as a guide to the expected potential accidental impacts of
the decommissioning phase. Accidental impacts during the construction phase should be
considered within the future Decommissioning Plan.
No High or Extreme Environmental Risks have been highlighted for this project. Only
Low and Moderate Environmental Risks have been identified. As such, the CEMP and
OEMP shall be required to include the control and mitigation measures for accidental
environmental impacts as identified within Table and Error: Reference source not found
as the necessary management and/or modification required as part of the EHSMS.
LPGs during
construction
Fire/
explosion risk.
Insignificant Consequence
Rare Probability
Rare
H-01.03
Equipment
damage,
personnel
injury/
fatality,
damage to
environment,
reputation.
Low Risk
Fire/
explosion risk.
Potential
consequences
include
equipment
damage,
personnel
injury and
fatality,
damage to
environment
and damage to
reputation.
Insignificant
Natural gas
for boilers
General
H-01.06
Risk Potential
Consequences
Sources
HAZid
General
Guideword/Activity
Table XXX
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Flame
scanners
should be
installed. Gas
line
inspections to
be carried
out regularly.
Additional
preventative
maintenance
procedures to
be carried
out regularly.
Use of LPG
during
construction
adheres to
Health and
Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Insignificant Consequence
Rare Probability
Rare
H-02.01
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
lube/ seal oil.
Insignificant
Fire/
explosion risk.
Consequences
Sources
HAZid
Guideword/Activity
General
Acetylene
Equipment
damage,
personnel
injury/
fatality,
damage to
environment,
reputation.
General
H-01.03
Risk Potential
Damage to
environment.
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Use of
Acetylene
during
construction
adheres to
Health and
Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
Oil held in
appropriate
containers,
regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in
place.
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Corrosion
inhibitors
Insignificant Consequence
Insignificant
Rare Probability
Rare
H-21.11
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
corrosion
inhibitors.
Low Risk
Diesel fuel
General
H-02.03
Breach of
diesel fuel
containment
resulting in
spill and
potential
source of fire.
Damage to
environment.
Equipment
damage,
environmental
damage,
personnel
injury and/or
fatality,
damage to
reputation.
Insignificant
Hydraulic oil
General
H-02.02
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
hydraulic oil.
Rare
Consequences
Sources
HAZid
General
Guideword/Activity
Risk Potential
Damage to
environment.
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Oil held in
appropriate
containers,
regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in
place.
Oil held in
appropriate
containers,
regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in
place.
Corrosion
inhibitors
held in
appropriate
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Sodium
hypochlorite
Insignificant
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
sodium
hypochlorite.
Insignificant Consequence
Rare Probability
Consequences
Damage to
environment.
Insignificant
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
used engine
oils.
Rare
H-22.04
Al Ghaith Industries
Damage to
environment.
Rare
Used engine
oils
General
H-21.17
Sources
HAZid
Guideword/Activity
General
Scale
inhibitors
General
H-21.12
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
scale
inhibitors.
Risk Potential
Minor injury,
minor
environmental
impact.
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Scale
inhibitors
held in
appropriate
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
Engine oils
held in
appropriate
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
Sodium
hypochlorite
held in
appropriate
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Al Ghaith Industries
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage.
Insignificant Consequence
Moderate Risk
Minor
Damage to
environment,
chemical
burns.
Possible
H-30.01
Dangerous
goods in
transport
activities
Insignificant
Possible
Caustic soda
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
caustic soda.
General
H-23.04
Possible Probability
Consequences
Sources
HAZid
Guideword/Activity
General
Hydrochloric
acid
Damage to
environment,
chemical
burns.
General
H-23.02
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage of
hydrochloric
acid.
Risk Potential
Environmental
, personnel
injury.
Project Number 44130065
Page 174
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
HCl held in
appropriate ,
bunded
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
Caustic soda
held in
appropriate
bunded
containment
units,
operational
procedures in
place.
All dangerous
goods in
transit held
in
appropriate
containment
tankers,
operational
safety
procedures in
place.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Al Ghaith Industries
Ref
ER operations
Damage to
environment.
Damage to
environment.
Low Risk
ER operations
Low Risk
Possible
Ref
Release of
compressor
oil.
Waste water
exceeds
environmental
discharge
limits.
Rare Probability
Consequences
Environmental
impact.
Rare
Waste Water
System
PEHSR Chlor-Alkali Plant
Rare
Ion exchange
regeneration
waste
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage.
Environmental
impact.
Rare
Filter
backwash
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage.
Environmental
impact.
Insignificant
Ref
Sources
HAZid
Guideword/Activity
Primary
Brine
Section
Ref
Waste sludge
Instrument Air
System
Secondary
Brine
Section
Secondary
Brine
Section
Ref
Breach of
containment
resulting in
spillage.
Risk Potential
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Sludge held
in
appropriate
containment
units.
Brine held in
appropriate
containment
units.
Appropriate spill/
splash kits available.
Liquid must
be held in
appropriate
containment
units.
Safety valve
controls
implemented.
Regular
maintenance
and checking
of safety
valves.
Appropriate
procedures
for informing
regulator in
place.
Appropriate spill/
splash kits available.
Appropriate spill/
splash kits available.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site.
Ref
Neutralization
tank
Off spec
discharge.
Insignificant Consequence
Rare Probability
Consequences
Sources
HAZid
Effluent
Neutralization
System
Guideword/Activity
Risk Potential
Damage to
environment.
Risk Controls
Prevention
Controls
pH
adjustment
prior to
discharge.
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
None
5.12.2.1.
EAD will evaluate the subsequent management plans as required for the Project, namely
the CEMP and OEMP. EAD will need to issue a Construction Environmental Permit or No
Objection Certificate (NOC), potentially with additional conditions, prior to the start of
construction for the Project. At their discretion, EAD may carry out site inspections to
verify compliance with the required plans.
5.12.2.2.
With overall responsibility for the Project, the Al Ghaith must demonstrate that the Project
minimises or removes any impact to the environment during the lifecycle phases
(construction, operation and decommissioning). The Al Ghaith will be required to formally
review and approve the subsequent management plans (CEMP, OEMP etc) prior to their
submission to EAD.
During Construction the Al Ghaith is responsible for:
Reviewing internal
management.
and
external
audit
reports
relating
to
environmental
Liaison with EAD representatives throughout the construction and operational phase
of the Project. Al Ghaith will:
o
Inform EAD immediately should any event occur on site that could have a
significant negative impact on the environment.
Implementation of the OEMP. Even when specific activities (for example, waste
disposal) are assigned to Subcontractors, it is ultimately the responsibility of Al
Ghaith to ensure OEMP compliance
Liaison with EAD representatives throughout the construction and operational phase
of the Project. Al Ghaith will:
o
Inform EAD immediately should any event occur on site that could have a
significant negative impact on the environment.
Oversee the implementation of the OEMP and ensure that each Subcontractor is
made aware of, and compliant with, its requirements.
5.12.2.3.
EPC Consortium
Al Ghaith has appointed XXXX as their EPC Contractors during the construction phase.
The EPC Consortium is responsible for:
Implementation of the CEMP. Even when specific activities (for example, site
preparation or waste disposal) are assigned to Subcontractors, it is ultimately the
responsibility of the EPC Consortium to ensure CEMP compliance.
Carrying out periodic HSE audits and review of the Project during the construction
phase to verify that the CEMP is being effectively implemented.
Oversee the implementation of the CEMP and ensure that each Subcontractor is
made aware of, and compliant with, its requirements.
5.12.2.4.
Subcontractors
It is the responsibility of those Subcontractors whose activities have at least one interface
with identified key environmental aspects to be fully knowledgeable of the environmental
management requirements and project environmental requirements.
Subcontractors directly in charge of activities such as waste transportation and disposal
will be registered and approved by EAD. Registration documentation must be provided to
Al Ghaith prior to commencement of any activities.
Subcontractors are expected to demonstrate a proactive behaviour towards
environmental concerns. It is their responsibility to provide information requested by
either the Al Ghaith or the EPC Consortium (during construction) with regard their scope
of activities and to demonstrate compliance with the applicable environmental
requirements.
Spill response;
Emergency response;
Waste handling.
It is expected that the majority of training sessions will be organised by the EPC
Consortium during the construction phase due to the high number of workers on site and
conducted internally, by the Site Environmental Manager or a nominated third party.
5.12.4. Communication
Communication required for effective environmental management of the Al Ghaith Project
shall be determined within the CEMP/OEMP, through it is envisaged the following will be
considered:
5.12.4.1.
Meetings
5.12.4.2.
Construction Signage
The following information should be posted to notice boards at the main construction site
office:
Signs (as well as cones and high visibility warning tape) should be used around any open
trench excavations, No smoking / No open fire signs should be displayed in areas of high
fire risk, and Emergency Response Charts displayed in prominent locations.
The Site Environmental Manager will also post prepared Environmental Emergency
Response Charts, detailing procedures, at prominent locations (for example, at the site
office, in the canteen, at notice boards, etc.). The Emergency Response Charts should
be produced in languages such that it can be understood by all personnel (e.g. Arabic,
English, Hindi and Urdu).
5.12.4.3.
Operational Communication
Internal Audits
During construction, the Site Environmental Manager should arrange regular inspections
and monthly internal environmental audits to:
Provide a summary of the Projects status with respect to construction works and
the environment;
The Site Environmental Manager during conastruction and the Environmental Manager
during operation will ensure the follow-up of corrective actions and recommendations for
formal closeout.
The audit report should include, but not be limited to:
For construction phase internal audits, the status of the Project shall be reported
including notification of any schedule changes for the construction programme.
Each Internal Environmental Audit report will be submitted for review to the Site Project
Manager during construction and the Operatons Manger during the operational phase.
5.12.6.2.
External Audits
Al Ghaith is responsible for ensuring regular (quarterly) external HSE audits are carried
out by an EAD-approved third party auditor for both construction and operational phases.
Al Ghaith should usually be informed in advance of any impending audit, which in order
to:
Enable HSE personnel to be available to answer any questions or conduct any site
inspections.
As part of the external audit all site environmental practices should be reviewed to ensure
compliance with local, national and international requirements.
Findings are required to be reported in a Site Visit Report via Aconex (a project
collaboration, document management software and online project management system)
with a date for the responsible party to respond with the mitigation actions taken. EAD
are also likely to undertake compliance audits on an adhoc basis.
6.
6.1.
Summary
An assessment of the health and safety risks for the construction and operational phases
of the Project was undertaken at the HAZID/ENVID session. The HAZID/ENVID looked in
detail at the construction phase and also highlighted any key issues for the
commissioning and operations phase.
No High Risk Occupational Health Hazards have been identified by the HAZID/ENVID.
All risks were classified as Medium or Low according to the Zonescorp Risk Matrix.
Overall, the facilities and nature of construction of the Chlor-Alkali Plant at the All Ghaith
site will be typical of chlor-alkali plants elsewhere in the UAE, and wider world. No
significant new or unusual hazards have been identified. No new or different occupational
issues are anticipated for the construction of the facility.
The operations at the new facility will involve operation, and maintenance of plant
equipment, these or similar operations are already carried out at within ICAD-1, and in
MIA. No new or different risks or hazards are anticipated during the operational phase.
The existing hazards are already managed by the ESNAAD HSEMS.
6.2.
Overview
The Zonescorp Code of Practice (CoP) on HSEIAs and CoP on Risk Management states
that the HSEIA should demonstrate that all High Occupational Health Risks have been
systematically identified, and suitable action to mitigate these risks and to protect
employees from these risks have been or will be taken in accordance with Zonescorp
Codes of Practice on Environment, Health, and Safety guidance.
A systematic Health and Safety Risk Assessment has been conducted for the Project
construction, commissioning and operations phases as part of this PEHSR and this has
not identified any Extreme or High health and safety risks as defined in the Zonescorp
Codes of Practice on Environment, Health, and Safety guidance.
The following section of the PEHSR therefore focuses on discussing the Moderate and
Low risk hazards identified and how all HSE risk - including that resulting from
Moderate and Low risk hazards - will be managed and controlled via the Al Ghaith /
EPC Contractor project/site/operations specific HSE Management System.
Health and safety risk assessment is a discipline devoted to anticipation, recognition,
evaluation, and control of environmental factors or stresses arising in the workplace,
which may cause sickness and impaired health to workers.
As part of the Preliminary Environment, Health and Safety Review (PEHSR) performed
for the Chlor-Alkali Plant in ICAD-1, the PEHSR describes the health hazards involved
and arising from the activities involved in the construction, pre-commissioning,
commissioning and operations phases of this project.
These activities will expose personnel to a variety of occupational health risks, which may
impact worker health. These are classified as:
Physical e.g.: noise, heat, vibration, UV
Chemical e.g.: exposure to solvents, oils
Biological e.g.: legionella, food poisoning
Ergonomic e.g.: posture, manual handling
This assessment was performed by a multi-disciplined team as part of the HAZID/ENVID.
During construction, the main significant physical occupational health risks will be heat
stress, high exposure to sun and outdoors UV radiation, dust exposure from grit blasting
operations and vehicle movements, and noise from compressed air tools etc. Suitable
controls will be in place for all these hazards including prevention/ minimisation strategies,
controls and awareness / monitoring programmes, procedures and PPE as necessary.
In terms of biological health risks particular attention will be given to fitness to work
assessments of labourers with medicals being required for all workers from abroad.
Only relatively low hazard chemicals will be used during construction and operations.
These are in common use and staff will be suitably trained and familiar with their safe
handling. The solvents and other chemicals proposed to be used in the Chlor-Alkali
process may spill and present potential environmental impacts.
The operating design for the facility incorporates a standard suite of controls to avoid
accidental releases. Moreover, the equipment configuration at the proposed plant will
conform to best practices for modern Chlor-Alkali plants.
In terms of ergonomic health hazards, these are numerous and include a wide range of
activities such as lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling or carrying. These occupational
hazards are relevant to both the construction and operations phases and will be
controlled by appropriate training and work procedures and practices.
Management has a duty of care and must be sensitive to the diversity and individual
requirements of its workforce. Elements that must be considered by management and in
particular by health care personnel include:
occupation
dietary habits
sanitation
culture
hygiene standards
language
public health
religion
endemic conditions
tradition
superstition
gender
family
The importance of familiarity with cultural norms of the workforce is an important factor in
the successful implementation of health and safety controls, etc.
6.3.
Four steps are accepted as being essential in the health and safety risk assessment
process:
1. Hazard identification. Identifying the agent responsible for the health problem and
its adverse effects.
2. Dose/response assessment. Describing the potential health effects of the hazard at
different levels of exposure.
3. Exposure assessment. Estimating the magnitude, duration and frequency of
exposure and the number of people exposed via different routes.
4. Risk characterization. Combining steps 2 and 3 to quantify the risk level in a specific
population.
OHRA is not an exact science; in assessing the implications of exposure to occupational
hazards for human health there are many uncertainties.
6.3.1.
As per the Zonescorp guidelines, the cornerstone of a health and safety risk assessment
is to carry out a Risk Assessment, in which the activities of an operation are reviewed in
order to:
Identify and create an inventory of agents potentially hazardous to health;
Evaluate (assess) the risk to health associated with exposure to these agents
against specified screening criteria;
Decide on the control measures required, if any, to remove or reduce the risk to
health to a level as low as reasonably practicable;
Consider any emergency (recovery) measures needed to mitigate acute and/or
chronic health effects, should control measures fail.
When applied systematically within an organisation, risk assessments can be used as a
management tool to assist in:
The comprehensive identification of work place health hazards for risk and health
impact assessments;
Prioritising the implementation of risk assessments, focusing first on those activities
involving the greatest potential risk to health;
Prioritising the implementation of additional control measures, where necessary, to
minimise the health risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable;
Including risk assessments as an integral component of introducing new, or
changes to existing, plants/processes/activities to ensure health hazards are
adequately controlled before the new/revised operation commences;
Educating staff on the health hazards, risks and measures of control appropriate to
their tasks;
Determining appropriate records on staff exposures to health hazards which, when
combined with health surveillance records, can be used to identify health trends and
problem areas for action, to fulfil legal requirements and to safeguard the company
against unforeseen liabilities.
6.3.2.
In addition to the Zonescorp requirement that throughout industrial activities the risks to
health are to be identified, it is a legal requirement in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that
employee health is to be protected. Occupational health matters in the emirate of Abu
Dhabi are regulated by:
UAE Federal Law No 8 of 1980: Regulation of labour relations
UAE Federal Law No 77 of 2005: regarding the handling of hazardous material;
UAE Federal Law No 1 of 2002: regarding the handling of radioactive material;
UAE Federal Law No 3 of 1978: regarding the conservation of petroleum resources
where there are some preventive measures to be followed;
Ministerial Order No. 32 of 1982 regarding the protection of workers;
Ministerial Order No. 467 of 2005 regarding the restriction of outdoor working hours
in summer.
The health and safety risk assessment has been performed in compliance with the
Zonescorp CoP EHS04 and EHS03 as well as local laws. Also international regulations
on occupational health were consulted in order to provide the most accurate and relevant
assessment.
6.3.3.
Scope of Work
The activities involved in the construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the
project will expose employees to a variety of health hazards. These include various
environmental factors or stresses that can be classified as physical, chemical, biological,
ergonomic and psycho-social.
PHYSICAL HAZARDS such as
Noise
Vibration: Whole Body and Hand-Arm vibration
Non-ionizing radiation
6.4.
Methodology
A comprehensive HAZID/ENVID/OHRA study has been undertaken for Phases 1-3 of the
Project. The study was carried out at the Al Ghaith offices in Musaffah, Abu Dhabi, on
10th July, 2011. The study team consisted of representatives from Al Ghaith Industries
and URS.
The output from the study has been used to develop a HER for the Project, which is
contained within this section of the PEHSR. The hazards have been assessed against
the Zonescorp risk matrix to assess their impact in terms of:
Minor (B)
Moderate (C)
Major (D)
Catastrophic (E)
Rare (1)
A1
B1
C1
D1
E1
Possible (2)
A2
B2
C2
D2
E2
Likely (3)
A3
B3
C3
D3
E3
Often (4)
A4
B4
C4
D4
E4
Frequent (5)
A5
B5
C5
D5
E5
Red
Amber
Yellow
Green
1.
2.
3.
Extreme Risk
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
The severity was assessed on the basis of the unmitigated hazard and the probability of
occurrence was assigned based on the likelihood of that scale of event occurring given
the safeguards (prevention, control, detection, mitigation) provided.
The impacts addressed in this section are grouped into categories related to the
causative factor, such as physical presence, air emissions, noise, fluid discharges, solid
wastes, and wastewater.
6.4.3. Hazards
Accidents and hazard can be defined as an event or process, which presents a threat,
and may lead to severe or catastrophic consequences, to people, assets, the
environment and/or company reputation. Consequences may be immediate or delayed
and may occur outside as well as inside the site. There will generally be a high potential
for escalation.
Examples of hazards and accidents would include, but are not limited to:
Loss of containment of flammable and/or toxic fluids leading to fire, explosion and/or
toxic injury;
Events resulting in structural failure which could lead to further progressive collapse;
Gas leakage;
Well blowouts;
Ships colliding with offshore installations or onshore jetties used for bulk loading
explosive, flammable or toxic substances;
Delivery vehicles colliding with or otherwise affecting industrial facilities;
Risk to
Risk to People
Risk to Environment
Risk to Assets
Risk to Reputition
Extreme
0
0
0
0
Low
25
26
37
43
H-01.03
LPGs during
construction
Consequences
Potential
consequences include
equipment damage,
personnel injury and
fatality, damage to
environment and
damage to
reputation.
Equipment damage,
personnel injury/
fatality, damage to
environment,
reputation.
D1
A1
A1
A1
D1
A1
A1
A1
C1
A1
A1
A1
General
H-01.03
Acetylene
Equipment damage,
personnel injury/
fatality, damage to
environment,
reputation.
General
H-05.02
Argon
Canister becomes
projectile due to
uncontrolled release
of gas.
Equipment damage,
personnel injury/
fatality, reputation.
Reputation
H-01.06
E1
A1
Assets
General
Sources
Environment
General
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
B1
B1
Prevention Controls
Flame scanners
should be installed.
Gas line inspections
to be carried out
regularly. Additional
preventative
maintenance
procedures to be
carried out
regularly.
Use of LPG during
construction
adheres to Health
and Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
Use of Acetylene
during construction
adheres to Health
and Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
Use of Argon during
construction
adheres to
applicable Health
and Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Emergency response
team, first aid,
emergency response
procedure
Risk Potential
H-02.03
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of lube/ seal oil.
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Hydraulic oil
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of hydraulic oil.
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Diesel fuel
Equipment damage,
environmental
damage, personnel
injury and/or fatality,
damage to
reputation.
B1
Equipment damage,
personnel injury
and/or fatality,
damage to
reputation.
A1
Personnel injury.
B1
Personnel injury.
D1
General
H-03.05
Hydrogen
General
H-05.03
Water under
pressure
General
H-06.01,2
Consequences
Reputation
General
H-02.02
Assets
General
H-02.01
Sources
Environment
General
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
Personnel at
height
Lack of control/
improper use of fire
fighting equipment.
Fall from height.
A1
A1
Prevention Controls
Oil held in
appropriate
containers, regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in place.
Oil held in
appropriate
containers, regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in place.
Oil held in
appropriate
containers, regular
equipment
maintenance,
operational
procedures in place.
Purging of hydrogen
adheres to Health
and Safety
guidance,
operations
procedures
implemented.
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
B1
Platforms with
handrails to be used
at all times along
with safety harness,
appropriate training
and hazard
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Risk Potential
Consequences
Reputation
Assets
Sources
Environment
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
Prevention Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
awareness provided.
General
H-06.03
Overhead
equipment
C1
A1
A1
General
H-08.05
Equipment
with moving/
rotating parts
Fingers or limbs
trapped in rotating
equipment.
Personnel injury.
C1
A1
A1
General
H-08.06
Use of
hazardous
hand tools
Personnel injury.
C1
A1
A1
General
H-08.07
Use of knives,
machetes etc
Careless and
improper use.
Personnel injury.
C1
A1
A1
H-10.03
Engine &
turbine
exhaust
systems
General
Personnel exposure
to hot exhaust.
Personnel injury.
A1
A1
A1
Overhead
equipment
maintained
regularly. No work
carried out
underneath moving
equipment.
Guards installed,
maintenance for
guards kept up to
date, work permit
system applied.
Maintenance of hand
tools, appropriate
training provided,
PPE available
Maintenance, PPE,
safety procedures &
appropriate training
provided.
PPE, access to
exhaust restricted,
appropriate
operational controls
in place, training
provided.
Risk Potential
General
Consequences
Reputation
H-14
Assets
Sources
Environment
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
Prevention Controls
Only to be carried
out be certified
welders, welding
procedures should
be followed at all
times, PPE, work
permit, protection
area
Burner management
systems, operating
procedures,
preventative
maintenance
Misuse/ improper
handling.
H-14.02
Direct fired
furnaces
D1
D1
C1
General
H-14.03
Flares
Equipment damage,
personnel injury/
fatality, damage to
reputation.
A1
A1
A1
Flame arrester,
elevated dispersion
stack
General
H-15.01
Short circuit.
D1
D1
B1
Design to British
Standards, UAE
design codes
General
H-15.02
Short circuit
D1
D1
B1
Design to British
Standards, UAE
design codes
General
H-15.03
Short circuit
D1
D1
B1
Design to British
Standards, UAE
design codes
General
H-15.04
Lightning
discharge
Lighting strike.
D1
D1
B1
General
C1
B1
A1
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Trained first aider on
site.
Risk Potential
B1
No confined space
working situations
present on site.
C1
Small working
volume, PPE,
operational
procedures, training
Fatality.
H-20.06
Chlorine
Uncontrolled release
from process pipes
(10kg max release).
Personnel injury,
fatality.
General
H-21.11
Corrosion
inhibitors
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of corrosion
inhibitors.
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
General
H-21.12
Scale
inhibitors
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of scale inhibitors.
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
H-21.17
Used engine
oils
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of used engine oils.
Damage to
environment.
General
H-22.04
Sodium
hypochlorite
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of sodium
hypochlorite.
A1
A1
A1
A1
General
H-23.02
Hydrochloric
acid
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of hydrochloric acid.
Damage to
environment,
chemical burns.
C2
A2
A2
A2
A1
Prevention Controls
Asphyxiation.
General
D1
Reputation
Consequences
Assets
Excessive N2
General
H-19.04
Sources
Environment
General
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
D1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
Corrosion inhibitors
held in appropriate
containment units,
operational
procedures in place.
Scale inhibitors held
in appropriate
containment units,
operational
procedures in place.
Engine oils held in
appropriate
containment units,
operational
procedures in place.
Sodium hypochlorite
held in appropriate
containment units,
operational
procedures in place.
HCl held in
appropriate ,
bunded containment
units, operational
procedures in place.
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Emergency response
team follow
emergency response
procedure, trained
first aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Risk Potential
Damage to
environment,
chemical burns.
C2
General
H-23.04
Caustic soda
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage
of caustic soda.
General
H-25.01
Manual
materials
handling
Misuse/ improper
handling.
Personnel injury.
General
H-25.04
Heat stress
Over exposure.
General
H-25.05
High humidity
General
H-30.01
Dangerous
goods in
transport
activities
Primary Brine
Section
Ref
Waste sludge
Secondary
Brine Section
Ref
Filter
backwash
A2
A2
A1
A1
A1
Dehydration,
personnel injury.
C2
A2
A2
Over exposure.
Dehydration,
personnel injury.
C2
A2
A2
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage.
Environmental,
personnel injury.
B2
B2
A2
A2
Environmental
impact.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Environmental
impact.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage.
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage.
A2
Reputation
Sources
Assets
Consequences
Environment
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
Prevention Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Trained first aider on
site.
Risk Potential
Risk Controls
HAZid
Sources
Environment
Assets
Reputation
Secondary
Brine Section
Ref
Ion exchange
regeneration
waste
Breach of
containment
resulting in spillage.
Environmental
impact.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Electrolysis of
Salt
Ref
Maintenance
activity
Misuse/ improper
handling.
Personnel injury.
B1
B1
C1
A1
Caustic Conc./
Flaking
H-25.01
Manual
materials
handling
Exposure to caustic,
Spill/ splash
Chemical burns.
C2
A2
A2
Hydrochloric
Acid
H-25.01
Manual
materials
handling
Chemical burns.
C2
A2
A2
Consequences
People
Guideword/
Activity
A2
Maintenance, PPE,
safety procedures &
training
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Over pressure
receiver.
Equipment damage,
personnel injury.
C1
A1
A1
A1
Instrument Air
System
Ref
ER operations
Release of
compressor oil.
Damage to
environment.
A1
B1
A1
A1
Page 202
A2
ER operations
Appropriate spill/
splash kits available.
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site, trained first
aider on site.
Ref
Al Ghaith Industries
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
Maintenance, PPE,
safety procedures &
training
Instrument Air
System
Prevention Controls
Appropriate spill/
splash kit equipment
on site.
Risk Potential
Reputation
Prevention Controls
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
Appropriate
procedures for
informing regulator
in place.
Damage to
environment.
A1
A1
A1
A1
pH adjustment prior
to discharge.
Ref
ER operations
Waste water
exceeds
environmental
discharge limits.
Effluent
Neutralization
System
Ref
Neutralization
tank
Al Ghaith Industries
Consequences
Assets
Sources
Waste Water
System
Environment
HAZid
People
Guideword/
Activity
Risk Controls
Mitigation/Recovery
Controls
None
Exposure
Rating
Occupation
al Health
Risk
Site watering
PPE
Medium
National Legislation
Rest area provided with water / hydrolite provided
Medium
Noise emissions
PPE
Piling activities during daytime
Regular maintenance
Medium
Application of
waterproofing
Toxicity
Fire
PPE
Application method statement/procedures
Low
Application of
epoxy coatings
Toxicity
PPE
Low
PPE
Competent Personnel
Chemical handling procedures
Low
Consequence
s / Escalation
Hazard
Rating
Earthworks
Dust Generation
Weather and
environment
High temperatures
Heat Stress
2.7
Piling Activities
2.10
Construction methods
4.2
Construction methods
No.
Keyword
2.1
Site preparation /
groundworks
2.3
6.6
Chemical Handling
Application/use of
lube oils, resins,
paints.
Fumes
As the hazard effect register above shows, most hazards either present a low risk, or will
be effectively managed by the safeguards and controls provided (Probability A Exposures are negligible, or B - Exposures are controlled and likely to remain so in
accordance with screening and performance criteria).
The exposure rating or one hazard has been assessed as Probability C (Exposures are
currently controlled to meet screening and performance criteria, but control cannot be
assured). This being the hazard of weather and environment. Obviously, the weather is
outside the direct control of the construction team. It is therefore necessary to mitigate
the effects of the weather to ensure that the risk is acceptable. It is considered that the
safeguards proposed meet good practice and are suitable and sufficient to reduce risk to
ALARP.
Table 7-16 Hazards Safeguards Rationale
No.
Hazard
Rationale
Construction Phase
2.3
6.5.
6.5.1. Noise
Table 7-17 Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Noise
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Noise
General in all the areas associated with the use of all rotating and moving
equipment, Use of compressed air / electric tools, portable generators etc.
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Excessive exposure to noise over a period of time may result in Noise
Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL). This is a progressive form of deafness
categorised largely by the loss of hearing response at a particular
frequency in the ear (4 KHz). This is clearly shown by a marked dip in
Health Effects of Hazard hearing response at the 4KHz band when audiometry is performed on an
affected individual.
Noise exposure may also result in Tinnitus. This is a constant ringing in
the ears that, in many cases, is highly distressing for the individual
affected.
It is not expected that any of the Construction areas will be subject to high
noise levels from existing plant since these are located away from noisy
plant areas.
Risk Control
Recommendations
Crane Operations
Floor cleaning
Workshop activities
Mechanical Technicians
Painting Operatives
Main Personnel Involved
Contractors
Inspection
Control at Source
6.5.2. Lighting
Adequate natural or artificial lighting must be provided particularly in workshops and work
areas as well as in surrounding service areas.
Table 7-18 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Lighting
Hazard Title
Lighting
Location of hazard
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Health Effects of Hazard
Risk Control
Recommendations
Area / Location
Illumination
(Lux)*
Area / Location
Illumination (Lux)*
Ablution Block
200
Office Area
500
Bakery
300
Recreation Room
300
Clinic
500
300
Dining Room
300
Sleeping Rooms
150
200
Stairways (Interior)
150
50
Storage Areas
200
Galley
500
Toilets
200
Hallways
150
Walk In Freezers
100
Kitchens
500
Walkway (Exterior)
50
Laundry Room
250
Workshops
300
6.5.3. Vibration
Table 7-20 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Hand- arm Vibration/Whole Body
Vibration
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Health Effects of
Hazard
Hazard Title
Risk Control
Recommendations
Activities / Tasks
Cutting
Drilling machine/lathe operations
Grinders and needle gunners
Personnel Involved
Mechanical Technicians (grinders).
The construction of the facilities will involve the use of percussive equipment (such as
jack hammers), hand-held power tools, powered equipment such as pneumatic drills and
air lances and non-powered work equipment such as hammer and bolster. This
equipment can cause hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). This is a painful condition
which represents a range of potentially permanent injuries affecting the circulation,
nerves, bones, and muscles in the hands and arms. It gives rise to the effect known as
vibration white finger (VWF). This aspect can be controlled by the adoption of hand arm
vibration exposure limits (ISO 53491).
Construction activities will also involve the deployment of earth-moving equipment,
dumper trucks, etc which can subject an operator to whole body vibration (WBV). This
1
ISO 5349-1:2001 - Mechanical vibration - Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration -Part 1: General requirements. ISO 5349-2:2001 - Mechanical vibration - Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to
hand-transmitted vibration -- Part 2: Practical guidance for measurement at the workplace.
can cause lower back pain and spinal damage. This aspect can be controlled by the
adoption of the WBV limits given in ISO 2631 2. Practical control measures would include
responding to worker complaints and symptoms (e.g. of bad back), minimising exposure
periods by rotating work activities, and improved vehicle seating.
WBV can cause serious musculoskeletal disorders affecting the spine and is associated
with back pain. Other work factors such as posture and heavy lifting activities are also
known to contribute to back problems. Whole body vibration symptoms range from a
general feeling of discomfort and motion sickness to lower jaw symptoms, chest and
abdominal pains, urge to urinate and influence on breathing movements.
Engineering Controls
Examining alternative methods of working that do not require use of high vibration
tools
Purchasing equipment with improved axle and/or cab suspension for heavy
machinery.
Fitting anti-vibration mounts where possible
Routing of the exhaust of hand held engine powered equipment through the
handles reduces the effect of vibration in cold climates, but is not expected to be of
significant benefit in this climate
Management Practices
Means to reduce hand-arm vibration include:
Reducing exposure time of machinery operators though work breaks and job
rotation and allocation
Ensuring the right tool is used for the right job under adequate supervision
Labelling all equipment and tools (new tools if acceleration exceeds 2.5 m/s 2 as
required by CoP V3-05)
Ensuring the use of anti vibration or low vibration tools, hand tools, grips and
gloves
ISO 2631-1:1997 - Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration -- Part 1: General
requirements.
Designing the job so that poor posture (which may cause strain on hands and
arms) is avoided
Ensure rotating parts are checked for balance and replaced if necessary;
Providing tool support to take the weight of the tool (e.g. tensioners or
balancers),so:
o
NIEMR
Source
Ultraviolet (UV)
The sun
Spotlights
Visible light
Arc welding
Laser devices
such as laser
levels
Very Low
Frequency (VLF)
and Extra Low
Frequency (ELF)
Infrared (IR)
The sun
Flares
Hot surfaces
Lasers.
Skin burns
Molten glass.
NIEMR
Source
Infrared lamps.
Mobile
communications
Radiofrequency
Fields
(phones, CB
radios, walkie
talkies)
Table 7-22 Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Non-Ionising Radiation Ultraviolet light
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Health Effects of Hazard Welding operations / gas cutting arc-eye. This is a painful, acute condition
caused by the exposure of the cornea to the intensive UV light derived from
the electric arc that is used during welding procedures. When unprotected
eyes are exposed to strong ultraviolet rays, such as an electrical arc, they
will become inflamed and sore and exposure can result in a temporary loss
of sight
Using evidence systematically collected from the scientific literature, nine
adverse health outcomes have been identified that are clearly caused by
UV exposure. The nine diseases assessed were:
Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM): Melanoma of the skin is a
malignant cancer of great severity. Although treatment is improving,
melanoma still carries a significant risk of death. Between 50% and 90% of
the burden of disease from melanoma is due to UV exposure.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCC): This is another type of
malignant skin cancer which generally progresses less rapidly than
melanoma and is less likely to cause death or ongoing disability. Of the
total SCC disease burden, 50-70% is attributable to UV exposure.
Basal cell carcinoma of the skin (BCC): This skin cancer appears
predominantly in older people and grows slowly by local spread. The
incidence and mortality of BCC were estimated to be 50-90% attributable to
UV exposure.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cornea or conjunctiva (SCCC): This is a
rare tumour of the surface of the eye. Some 50-70% of the disease burden
due to SCCC is attributable to UV exposure.
Hazard Title
Risk Control
Recommendations
Burners goggles
Labourers wear protective clothing during daily work
Protective shelters. Suitable protective clothing and administrative controls,
including job rotation and rest breaks, should be provided where
engineering controls are unavailable or ineffective to reduce exposure
levels.
Welding.
Activities / Tasks
Work outside during summer.
Maintenance Technicians
Personnel Involved
Operators
Labourers
The UV region covers the wavelength range 100-400 nm and is divided into three bands:
Worldwide some 12 to 15 million people become blind from cataracts annually, of which
up to 20% may be caused or enhanced by sun exposure according to WHO estimates.
Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that environmental levels of UV
radiation may suppress cell-mediated immunity and thereby enhance the risk of infectious
diseases and limit the efficacy of vaccinations. UAE is located close to the equator and
hence, people are exposed to the very high levels of UV radiation that occur in these
regions.
It is a popular misconception that only fair skinned people need to be concerned about
overexposure to the sun. Although darker skin has more protective melanin pigment and
the incidence of skin cancer is lower in dark skinned people, skin cancers do occur within
this group and unfortunately they are often detected at a later, more dangerous stage.
The risk of UV radiation-related health effects on the eye and immune system is
independent of skin type.
UV reaching the earths surface is largely composed of long-wavelength UVA with a small
amount of the shorter wavelength UVB. Most UVB and the very short wavelength UVC is
filtered out by the atmosphere. UV radiation levels are influenced by:
Sun elevation: the higher the sun in the sky, the higher the UV level, with an
increase in UVB relative to UVA. Thus UV levels vary with time of day and time of
year.
Cloud cover: UV levels are highest under cloudless skies. However, even with
cloud cover, UV levels can be high due to scattering within the atmosphere.
Altitude: at higher altitudes, the atmosphere is thinner and the air mass is
decreased; less UV is absorbed.
Ozone: ozone present in the atmosphere absorbs some of the UV that would
otherwise reach the earths surface. Ozone depletion leads to increased UVB
levels with little impact on UVA levels.
Ground reflection: grass, soil and water reflect less than 10% of UV; fresh snow
reflects as much as 80%; dry beach sand about 15% and sea foam about 25%.
UV can neither be seen nor felt. Therefore UV measurements are necessary to determine
precisely the extent of ground level (ambient) UV. UV measurements such as the global
solar UV index add up all the solar UV, taking account of its ability to cause skin damage.
If measurements are not available, an approximation of ambient UV levels can be based
on geographic latitude.
For individuals, the UV exposure additionally depends on factors such as behaviour and
use of sun protectants, e.g., clothing, hats, sunscreen and sunglasses, during outdoor
(including occupational) activities. A persons skin type is also important. Fair skinned
people suffer from sunburn much more readily than dark-skinned people.
Prevention of UV overexposure:
Limit time in the midday sun: The suns UV rays are the strongest between 10
a.m. and 2 p.m ( = 2 hours each side of the solar noon). To the extent possible,
limit exposure to the sun during these hours.
Use shade wisely: Seeking shade when UV rays are the most intense is
recommended, however, shade structures such as trees, umbrellas or canopies
do not offer complete sun protection.
Wear protective clothing: A hat with a wide brim offers good sun protection for
eyes, ears, face, and the back of your neck. Sunglasses, with adequate side
protection that provide 99 to 100 percent UV-A and UV-B protection will greatly
reduce eye damage from sun exposure. Tightly woven, loose fitting clothes will
provide additional protection from the sun.
It is noted that experience from previous projects in Abu Dhabi that most workers
cover their body and head to prevent sun exposure. A policy of wearing long
sleeves at all times should be in place.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Thermal Extremes
Heat stress is an issue during manual work outdoors during the construction
phase.
Heat stress: Heat stroke may occur when core body temperature rises
above 40 degrees. Likely to only become an issue where personal are
exposed to high temperatures, combined with a high workload. Can be fatal
if untreated. Other heat-related conditions include:
Heat Syncope heat induced fainting.
Heat Stroke, which occurs when the bodys temperature regulatory
system fails and sweating, becomes inadequate. The victim is mentally
confused, delirious, perhaps in convulsions, or unconscious. Unless the
victim receives quick and appropriate treatment, death can occur
Health Effects of
Hazard
Heat Exhaustion occurs when large quantities of fluids and salts are lost
through copious sweating. The victim may vomit or lose consciousness
Fainting may occur when a worker unaccustomed to hot environments
stands erect and immobile. Vasodilation causes the blood to pool rather
than return to the heart for recirculation
Heat Rash or prickly heat occurs in hot, humid environments where sweat
does not evaporate easily
Transient Heat Fatigue refers to the temporary discomfort and mental or
psychological strain arising from prolonged heat exposure. Heat
acclimatization should reduce the severity of this disorder
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Risk Control
Recommendations
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
Various
The construction workers on the Project are, potentially at risk of heat stress. Heatinduced disorders range in their severity according to a number of factors including
duration of exposure, individual fitness, ambient temperature, fluid intake and work rate.
Four environmental factors affect the amount of stress a worker faces: temperature,
humidity, radiant heat (sun-shine) and air velocity. Perhaps most important to the level of
Heat stress an individual faces are personal characteristics such as age, weight, fitness,
medical condition and acclimatization to the heat.
Remediation methods are:
Acclimatisation: The human body can adapt over time to heat exposure. As
cardiovascular demand is reduced, the worker will sweat more efficiently and maintain
body temperature more easily. For many workers already adapted to UAE working
conditions this is already the case.
Fluid Replacement Provide workers with large and easily available amounts of water
and recommend drinking regime of one cup every 20 minutes. Provide adequate supplies
of water and other drinking liquids in all working areas.
Engineering Controls Provide air ventilation and local air cooling using fans, air
conditioning where feasible, shielding (carefully placed to avoid loss of air flow and
regularly cleaned to maintain effectiveness). Dead mans switch or other safeguards to
avoid loss of equipment control in the event of fainting.
Worker Monitoring Programmes Personal monitoring is required for all workers
exposed to the risk of heat stress. Training in heat management should include guidance
on measuring workmates heart rate and anticipating signs of heat stress in fellow
workers.
Other Administrative Controls should include reducing the physical demands of the
work where possible (e.g. using mechanical aids to avoid manual handling); providing
recovery areas (e.g. shaded with good air circulation); implementing shift work regimes
(early morning, night work) and intermittent rest periods with water breaks; using relief
workers; pacing workers to a specific job; assigning extra workers; limiting worker
occupancy and providing air conditioning and adequate ventilation for worker (CoPV305).
The EPC Contractor will implement a plan to control Heat Stress risk, by having in place
appropriate preventative measures, recognising the symptoms of heat stress, monitoring
the ambient temperature and having suitable medical aid on hand.
Heat stress occurs when the body cannot dispose of excess heat. When this happens,
the bodys core temperature rises and the heart rate increases. As the body continues to
store heat, the individual begins to lose concentration and has difficulty focusing on a
task; they may become irritable or sick and often lose the desire to drink. The next stage
is most often fainting, and death is possible if the person is not removed from the heat
stress.
6.5.6. Electricity
Table 7-24 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Electricity
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Electricity
Electrical supplies, cables
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Spasms, burns, muscle paralysis, or death can result depending on the
amount of the current flowing through the body, the route it takes, and the
Health Effects of Hazard duration of exposure
Injury to persons, even small electric shock can result in loss of balance
and resulting falls, from ladders, scaffold or other work platforms
Risk Control
recommendations
See below
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
The particular groups at risk from electrocution would include electrical and
control system workers and those carrying out general construction works
where this is a possibility of striking cables during excavation
For most people contact with an electrical current will have the following health effects.
Table 7-25 Health Effects of Electricity
Effect
Death from disturbed heart action
Current (mA)
Voltage (V)
1000
Above 230
200 240
50
Above 50
30-40
Above 50
70 or more
15-20
25 or more
20 25
Below 1
15
The electricity arcs (jumps) through a gas (such as air) to a person who is
grounded (that would provide an alternative route to the ground for the electricity)
The heat generated by the electric arc causes thermal burns including flash burns
from heat generated by an electric arc
Materials that catch on fire from heating or ignition by electrical currents causing
flame burns. High voltage contact burns can cause severe internal burns while
leaving only very small injuries on the outside of the skin
The use of service plans and cable locating devices will reduce the likelihood of
penetration of high-voltage cables.
Electrical tools, where possible should be run from 110V centre tapped earth
systems. This will limit the potential voltage to which a person can be exposed to
55V. Portable electrical appliances shall be earthed or double insulated and shall
be inspected at least weekly. The Permit to Work System controls the use of
portable electrical equipment.
All electrical tools must be individually identified and registered. This register
should include details of:
o
The date and results of the last detailed examination and maintenance
This register must be kept up to date and used to record the maintenance and
examination history of all electrical tools. All tools must be inspected before use every day
that they are used. Users must be trained to carry out these inspections and be aware of
the pass/fail criteria and means of rectifying the defects.
All portable tools must undergo regular appliance testing. For 110V equipment, in a
construction environment, the recommended interval is every three months. For 240V
tools, the recommended interval is every month.
All electrical installations shall conform to the relevant safety and design standards, and
all machinery and equipment shall be effectively earthed.
In Hazardous areas all electrical apparatus shall be intrinsically safe or explosion proof.
To ensure the safety of personnel working on or in the vicinity of electrical equipment, all
such electrical equipment shall be electrically isolated prior to the work being carried out,
and de-isolated when the work is completed.
6.5.7.
Machinery Hazards
Table 7-26 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Physical Agents Machinery Hazards
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Machinery Hazards
For any activity involving close proximity to a potential machinery hazard,
including e.g. rotating machinery, abrasive wheels, hydraulic systems, or
portable power operated tools
See below
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
Various
A person may be in danger of being injured by coming into contact with machinery, by
being trapped between the machinery and any material or fixed structure, by becoming
entangled with moving parts of the machinery, by being struck by parts of the machinery
or any material ejected from it.
For any activity involving close proximity to a potential machinery hazard, including e.g.
rotating machinery, abrasive wheels, hydraulic systems, or portable power operated tools,
a risk assessment shall be carried out and a specific procedure should be prepared.
Rotating Machinery Machine Guards
Every dangerous part of all machinery shall be securely guarded, as follows:
Guards shall automatically prevent the machine operator coming into contact with
a moving dangerous part of a machine.
All guards, whether fixed or automatic, shall be constantly maintained and kept in
position while the machinery is in service or on standby. All guards shall be of
sound design and of adequate strength, sufficient to withstand the stresses of the
process and environmental conditions.
Guards shall not only provide protection but be so constructed and in such
condition that they do not create any hazard themselves.
Fixed guards shall be checked to ensure that they are securely fastened in place
that no access is possible from any point into the trapping area, and no
secondary trap has been formed between the guard itself and any moving part of
the machine.
Adjustable guards shall be checked daily to ensure that the adjustable element of
the guard remains firmly in place once positioned.
Abrasive Wheels
All persons handling, or using, grinding machines or abrasive wheels shall be familiar with
the hazards involved. Sufficient heat may be generated by the operation in the form of
sparks, or by friction, to ignite a flammable mixture; heavy hydrocarbons can also be
vaporised by the heat of grinding.
A hot work permit shall be obtained before using grinders, or abrasive cutters, in
hazardous areas, or on equipment, which is not completely free of oil residue.
The permit must state the conditions for carrying out the operation safely.
All persons handling, or using, this equipment, shall ensure that:
A guard shall be provided to enclose the wheel to the greatest possible extent,
with the opening as small as possible consistent with the nature of the work.
Do not use grinding machines and abrasive wheels unless you are competent to
do so.
Hydraulic Jacks
The following precautions are to be observed when using hydraulic jacks to raise
equipment:
Jacks are to be inspected before use to ensure that they are in a sound condition
and that the oil in the reservoir reaches the minimum recommended level.
Pneumatic Tools
Operators shall ensure that the air pressure is properly regulated and is no higher than
necessary to undertake the work satisfactorily.
Only hoses and couplings of the recommended size and in good condition shall be used.
Caution: Under no circumstances shall compressed air be directed at any part of a
persons body.
The air supply shall be disconnected from pneumatic tools before changing attachments
or carrying out any adjustment or dismantling. The air hose to the equipment shall be
safely routed to prevent damage due to heat, chemical or machinery means. Tools shall
not be modified or the labels and inscriptions defaced or removed. Pneumatic drills are
designed for use with drilling bits, which can be held by chuck or collet adaptors. These
drills shall not be used for any other purpose without consulting the manufacturer. Drill
bits shall not be larger than the rated capacity of the chuck or collet. Similarly, drill bits
used with collets shall be designed for one specific size or range of collet. The drill bit
shall be inserted as far as possible into the chuck or collet and clamped securely and
centrally (with the air supply isolated). Chuck keys shall always be removed after use.
The work piece shall be sufficiently secure to accept the drilling operation without moving
or turning, particularly when sharp edged sheet material is being worked on. Care shall
be taken to avoid jamming (seizing) of the drill. Thrust shall be applied in the direction of
drilling particularly with angle drills. If a side handle or additional grip handle is used, it
shall be securely fixed.
Seizure or jamming of the drill bit causes a reaction torque, which may be dangerous with
hand held drills. Lubrication and/or a reduction in feed pressure should reduce the
likelihood of the drill bit jamming.
6.5.8. Dust
Construction activities such as abrasive blasting of structures, excavation, earth moving
and digging, masonry, concrete work, demolition, pressurized air blowing, jack
hammering, removing rust or paint, sanding and scaling, hauling, pouring, mixing, or
dumping silica-containing materials generates high levels of respirable dust which often
contains a high crystalline silica content.
Furthermore the project location is in a sandy area that will likely expose employees to
high levels of ambient dust and respirable particles.
Breathing in this dust can lead to the development of respiratory ill health, in particular
scarring of the lung tissue (silicosis) which can result in serious breathing difficulties,
depending on the extent of exposure. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease including
airways diseases such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema is characterized
by airways dysfunction and is often associated with occupational exposure to airborne
respirable particles.
From an occupational health perspective, clay, sand, brick dust and ash are all respiratory
sensitisers. They usually contain silica or silica dust, and are known as Respirable
Crystalline Silica (RCS). Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002
(COSHH) has been amended in 2004 to include the control of the exposure to RCS and
to further protect workers health.
Respiratory sensitisers are substances which when breathed in can trigger an irreversible
allergic reaction in the respiratory system. Once this sensitisation reaction has taken
place, further exposure to the substance, even to the tiniest trace, will produce symptoms.
Sensitisation does not usually take place right away. It generally happens after several
months or even years of breathing in the sensitiser.
In addition to being able to trigger allergic response, occupational exposure to dust
arising from sand or from work-related respiratory symptoms, can typically results in chest
tightness/wheeze, nasal and eye irritation.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Dust
Work areas associated with grinding, cement handling and outdoor areas
exposed to sand dust
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Respiratory tract irritation possibly leading to silicosis or other chronic
Health Effects of Hazard pulmonary impairment. Dust can also irritate eyes and cement can also
irritate the skin.
Use of guards for cutting and grinding, and wetting where applicable. Use
of extract ventilation where available. Use of suitable PPE e.g. dust mask
or face mask
Risk Control
recommendations
Wearing of suitable PPE when handling or working with cement and other
dusty materials. Use of handling operations to minimise dust generation,
including good housekeeping
For sand dust traffic management plans to minimise dust generation in
areas where people maybe working, monitoring of dust conditions and
damping down of dusty areas, wearing of PPE where dust levels area
problem.
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
The major airborne particles identified in the scope of this project are:
Cement Dust
Cement dust is a particularly alkaline and irritant dust, and might therefore be considered
to pose a greater risk of respiratory tract damage than many other poorly soluble dusts
(generically often referred to as low toxicity dusts). International data describes
evidence for an increased risk of chronic bronchitis and impairment of pulmonary function
in cement dust exposed workers, but there is a lack of data on dose-response
relationships. Some studies have been published suggesting that exposure to cement
dust may be a cause of laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer and other evidences reports
that repeated exposure to cement has produced chronic bronchitis and impaired
pulmonary function.
Furthermore, Hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) can be present in cement raw materials,
Hexavalent chromium being a highly toxic form of chromium.
Sand
Inhaling Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) can lead to silicosis. Silicosis is a serious and
irreversible lung disease that causes permanent disablement and early death, and it is
made worse by smoking.
In order to minimize the amount of RCS and to minimize nuisance to construction
workers, the following recommendations could be applied:
Damp down surface of main critical areas generating high levels of airborne dust
6.6.
Health Effects
1-3 ppm
5-15 ppm
30 ppm
40-60 ppm
430 ppm
1,000 ppm
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) publishes ERPG levels for various
chemicals (http://www.aiha.org/Committees/documents/erpglevels.pdf.). If an EPRG-2
value has been published, the Emergency Response Guideline uses this number for
setting the Protective Action Distance (PAD). If an ERPG-2 value has not been
established, the PAD is set at 0.01 x Lethal Concentration (LC) 50.
The other useful exposure limits for chlorine are presented below in Table XXX)
Table 6-29:
National Institute of
Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH)
Description
0.5
Recommended Exposure
Limit (REL)
American Conference of
Governmental Industrial
Hygienist (ACGIH)
0.5
0.5
USEPA
0.5
1.0
NIOSH
1.0
ACGIH
1.0
STEL
UK HSE
1.0
STEL, OEL
NIOSH
10
Immediately Dangerous to
Life or Health (IDLH)
Permissible Exposure,
(ppm)
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Health Effects of Hazard Long-term contact with used oils (which contain polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons) may result in increased risk of skin cancer.
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Use Impervious gloves
Risk Control Status
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
Electrical Technicians
Instrument Technicians
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Hazard Title
Personnel Involved
Electrical Technicians.
Instrument Technicians.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Welding Fume
During welding operations
Health Effects of Hazard Welding fumes are irritating by inhalation. Long-term exposure to welding
fumes containing nickel and chromium may give rise to an enhanced risk of
personnel developing cancers of the respiratory tract. Welding fumes can
have acute effects on the respiratory system. For example, welding on
galvanized steel can cause a condition known as Fume Fever, which is
caused by the inhalation of cadmium and zinc particles.
A welding process generates a tremendous amount of heat. A welder may
be exposed to a heat stress situation as a result of the process and it is
essential that a protocol be developed to address the potential for worker
distress.
Hazard Title
Welding Fume
The welding area should always be equipped with a fire blanket and a wellstocked first aid kit.
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Risk Control
Recommendations
See below
Welding activities.
Activities / Tasks
Metal fabrication/reparation activities
Personnel Involved
The potential hazards from solder fumes depend on the flux material (typically tungsten or
silver). Silver solder may contain cadmium, a heavy metal which can cause rapid fatality
(within 20 minutes), zinc fumes can cause metal fume fever, a temporary condition like
flu, but which can have severe effects from high enough exposure. Long-term exposure
can result in siderosis (CoP). Coatings and insulation materials may result in exposure to
other harmful chemical agents (e.g. carbon monoxide from epoxy-coatings).
Arc welding produces fumes of metallic oxides, amorphous silica, silicates and fluorides.
Polyurethane coatings on the welding materials may produce hydro-cyanide,
formaldehydes and isocyanates (Carcinogenic). Chromium, nickel and lead may also be
present. These heavy metals have long-term potentially fatal occupational health effects.
Al Ghaith HSE Management should ensure arc welding follows best management
practice:
Select solder flux without zinc, cadmium, and other toxic chemical agents
Avoid welding on surfaces that are still wet with a degreasing solvent
Use of PPE: Full-face masks, eye protection (for UV radiation and projectiles),
aprons, gloves, etc.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Health Effects of
Hazard
Irritant and narcotic (may cause drowsiness, lassitude etc. during the
inhalation of high concentrations). Thinners may be absorbed through the
skin. Long-term use has been implicated in increased risk of damage to the
nervous system.
Activities / Tasks
Painting activities
Personnel Involved
Paints, primers and thinners can contain organic solvents, epoxy resins, isocyantes and
potentially Hexavalent chromium compounds (primers for anti-corrosive purposes).
Solvents may be used as degreasers and be present in paints, adhesives and sealants.
Exposure to other worker groups would be insignificant in comparison unless working in
confined or poorly ventilated spaces with the identified groups.
Hexavalent chromium (zinc chromate, strontium chromate etc found in anti-corrosion
paints and pigments) can induce occupational health effects such as carcinogenic effects
or chrome ulcers.
Epoxy resins found in paints sealants and coatings can cause skin and respiratory
sensitisation and can also cause dermatitis and asthma.
Table 7-34 Health Effects of main Chemicals found in Paints and Thinners
Chemical group
Organic solvents
Found in
Health Effects
Skin, eye and respiratory tract
irritant, causes dermatitis and
asthma. Exposure to extremely
high concentration can result in
fatality
Contributes to negative ozone
depletion
Isocyanates
Paint additive
Respiratory sensitiser,
carcinogenic
Paint additive
CO
Concentration
(ppm)
Exposure
Time
50
8 hours
25
8 hours
200
400
1-2 hours
800
45 min.
1600
20 min.
The local exhaust ventilation must be maintained and inspected as per the legal
requirements. Users should be trained in its positioning and pre-use checks to ensure
that it has no obvious defects.
In no circumstances should personnel consider enriching the atmosphere inside a
confined space with additional oxygen to counter the effects of CO. This presents
significant hazards itself, specifically a greatly increase fire and explosion risk.
6.7.
Group 3 can cause severe human disease and may be a serious hazard to
employees; it may spread to the community, but there is usually effective
prophylaxis or treatment available.
6.7.1. Bioaerosols
Table 7-36 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Biological Agents Bioaerosols
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Bioaerosols
Air conditioning systems at the sanitaries
Bioaerosols Bacteria and viruses are the most likely agents to affect the
workforce, particularly if suspended in liquid droplets and spread though
Health Effects of Hazard
close body contact or the air conditioning systems at the sanitaries and or
washing facilities. Agents include influenza, tuberculosis and Hepatitis A.
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Risk Control
Recommendations
See below
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
Other bioaerosols such as fungi (where fungi spores or mycotoxins blown into the air
during extensive renovation demolishing works) and antigens are unlikely to create a
significant risk to occupational health. Control measures should include:
Filter checking and replacement to avoid fungal spores and other biological
particles
Keeping drainage pans and the rest of the system clear of sediments which may
provide nutrients or harbourage
Design of sanitary hot water provisions to showers etc to minimise the incidence
of dead legs
6.7.2. Legionella
Table 7-37 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Biological Agents Legionella and Legionnaires
Disease and Sick Building Syndrome
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
6.7.3. Sanitation
Sanitation generally refers to the provision of facilities and services for the safe disposal
of human urine and faeces. Inadequate sanitation is a major cause of disease world-wide
and improving sanitation is known to have a significant beneficial impact on health both in
households and across communities (WHO 1993, WHO 1999, ADNOC 2000). The word
sanitation also refers to the maintenance of hygienic conditions, through services such
as garbage collection and wastewater disposal.
Table 7-38 Occupational Health Hazard Inventory Biological Agents Infectious Diseases
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Infectious Diseases
Personnel Hygiene Facilities and Toilets
See below
Activities / Tasks
Personnel hygiene
Personnel Involved
Personnel hygiene facilities such as wash basins with a supply of soap, hot and cold
water, hygienic means for drying hands, lavatories and changing facilities must be
available to ensure that an appropriate degree of personal hygiene can be maintained
and to avoid contaminating or spreading contamination (OSHA 1998, ADNOC May 2000).
Toilets/lavatories must be located such that they do not open directly into any food
preparation, cooking or eating area. Storage lockers must be provided in changing rooms.
Control of infectious diseases in the workplace should be performed by:
Standard precautions must also be instituted for other infectious diseases of significance
in the workplace (HMSO, 1981). These include, but are not limited to:
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Risk Control
recommendations
Activities / Tasks
Grit-blasting activities.
Production Operators.
Mechanical Maintenance Technicians.
Welding Operations.
Personnel Involved
Electrical Technicians.
Instrument Technicians.
Service Company Crew.
While the principles of confined space entry are generally universal, local regulatory
requirements may impose specific additional responsibilities or may specify standards
that differ from those usually stated elsewhere.
Many incidents occur because victims do not fully understand the threat of airborne
hazards that they cannot see, smell, or feel. Additional incidents occur when untrained
persons enter unknown atmospheres to rescue fallen co-workers. Common causes of
confined space related incidents are:
1. Unsafe Acts and Omissions
a. Failure to test the atmosphere in a confined space before entry.
b. Failure to continuously monitor the atmosphere in a permit-required confined
space.
c.
2. Unsafe Conditions
a. Lack of training.
b. Fall hazards.
c.
f.
Flammable atmosphere.
j.
k.
Entrapping mechanisms.
l.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Manual Handling
Widespread various locations
Personnel Involved
Production Operators
Manual handling covers a wide range of activities including lifting, lowering, pushing,
pulling or carrying. Manual handling incidents often cause musculoskeletal disorders
(MSDs), i.e. disorders relating to, or involving, the muscles and the skeleton (COPV306). These types of disorders are one of the largest contributors to work-related illness,
e.g. muscular back pain, slipped disk, and fractured arm.
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Health Effects of Hazard Work-related soft-tissue injuries of the hand, wrist, elbow and neck.
Relevant Corporate
Standards
Risk Control Status
WRULD risk at the site will mostly come from repetitive movements and
some awkward positions that may cause sprains and strains.
Activities / Tasks
Personnel Involved
Many chronically disabling muscular skeletal disorders (like tendonitis, carpal tunnel
syndrome and low-back pain) occur as a result of traumatic injury, repetitive forceful
movements, and awkward postures or over exertion.
Studying the ergonomics of a workers environment may help reduce the risk. Employees
particularly at risk include:
Masons, carpenters, and others involved in repetitive motion and carrying heavy
loads
Job allocation and rotation should be used to avoid prolonged work in awkward
positions or repetitive heavy loads
Medical facilities will be available for workers who suffer symptoms of MSDs
Hazard Title
Location of hazard
Floors, platforms, ramps, stairs and walkways available for use by workers
shall be maintained in a state of good repair and kept free of slipping and
tripping hazards.
Activities / Tasks
All
Personnel Involved
Various
Slips and trips are the most common cause of major injuries at work. They occur in
almost all workplaces, 95% of major slips result in broken bones.
Most slips occur in wet or contaminated conditions. Most trips are due to poor
housekeeping.
Al Masaood need to assess the risks to identify the necessary preventative measures.
These shall include (in no particular order):
Prevention of contamination.
Housekeeping.
7.
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
8.
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENTS
9.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
This Preliminary Environment, Health and Safety Review for the Al Ghaith Industries
Caustic / Chlorine Project covers the various environmental, health and safety aspects
and related impacts due to this project. Al Ghaith Industries has used one of the best
available technologies (BAT) for their Project and has taken reasonable measures in its
design philosophy to tie-in to existing facilities and utilities thus helping to eliminate and
mitigate potential impacts on the people, the environment, company assets and company
reputation. The entire plant has been designed on the principle of Best Available
Technology Not Entailing Excessive Cost (BATNEEC) and where residual impacts
remained, BAT was applied.
The selection of membrane cell technology itself for the production of caustic and chlorine
at the plant is considered to be BAT. Reasons for selection of this technology are:
Membrane cell technology does not use toxic chemicals such as mercury and
asbestos; therefore, it is the most environmentally-friendly process in comparison
to other popular technologies (Diaphragm cell and Mercury cell) for the
production of chlorine and caustic; and
Membrane cell technology is the most energy-efficient option, and the power
consumption is only 60 to 65 % when compared to other available technologies.
Installation of chlorine absorption unit designed to be able to absorb the full cellroom chlorine production in the event of process upset until the plant can be shut
down;
Use of entire hydrogen gas as fuel in the hydrochloric acid (HCl) synthesis in
order to conserve energy;
Installation of Vapor Absorption System in the chilled water unit to avoid use of
ozone-depleting substances;
Installation of low NOx burners with the steam boiler and flaking unit to reduce
NOx emissions; and
There were no potential impacts found to be of extreme to high risk as per Zonescorp
CoP EHS04.
From the information gathered from the baseline studies, and after review of the potential
impacts and proposed mitigation and monitoring requirements set forth in this PEHSR, it
is believed that potential project impacts have been adequately identified and addressed
through the effective use of mitigation and control measures, and/or monitoring
requirements.
The proposed expansion being located within ICAD-1 is also an advantage and helps
lower environmental impact due to the use of existing infrastructure and resources and
the synergies that can be optimally used at various stages of the project. The location for
proposed plant was selected in ICAD-1 based on the following reasons.
Taking into consideration the information documented in this PEHSR, it can be stated that
the Al Ghaith Industries Caustic / Chlorine project can avoid environmental, health and
safety concerns during its construction and operation phase by implementing the
mitigation, control and monitoring measures provided.
Appendix A -